id Col1 Col2 Col3 Col4 Col5 Col6 Col7 Col8
1 2 - General disclosures 1. Basis for preparation BP-1 - General basis for preparation of sustainability statements
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the general basis for preparation of its sustainability statement.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of how the undertaking prepares its sustainability statement, including the scope of consolidation, the upstream and downstream value chain information and, where relevant, whether the undertaking has used any of the options for omitting information referred to in points d) and e) in the following paragraph.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose the following information:
    1. whether the sustainability statement has been prepared on a consolidated or individual basis;
    2. for consolidated sustainability statements:
      1. a confirmation that the scope of consolidation is the same as for the financial statements, or, where applicable, a declaration that the reporting undertaking is not required to draw-up financial statements or that the reporting undertaking is preparing consolidated sustainability reporting pursuant to Article 48i of Directive 2013/34/EU; and
      2. where applicable, an indication of which subsidiary undertakings included in the consolidation are exempted from individual or consolidated sustainability reporting pursuant to Articles 19a(9) or 29a(8) of Directive 2013/34/EU;
    3. to what extent the sustainability statement covers the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain (see ESRS 1 section 5.1 Reporting undertaking and value chain);
    4. whether the undertaking has used the option to omit a specific piece of information corresponding to intellectual property, know-how or the results of innovation (see ESRS 1 section 7.7 Classified and sensitive information and information on intellectual property, know-how or results of innovation); and
    5. for undertakings based in an EU member state that allows for the exemption from disclosure of impending developments or matters in the course of negotiation, as provided for in articles 19a(3) and 29a(3) of Directive 2013/34/EU, whether the undertaking has used that exemption.

 

Application Requirements

AR 1.    When describing to what extent the sustainability statement covers the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain (see ESRS 1 section 5.1 Reporting undertaking and value chain), the undertaking may distinguish between:

  1. the extent to which its materiality assessment of impacts, risks and opportunities extends to its upstream and/or downstream value chain;
  2. the extent to which its policies, actions and targets extend to its value chain; and
  3. the extent to which it includes upstream and/or downstream value chain data when disclosing on metrics.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/BP1%20explanation.pdf None
2 2 - General disclosures 1. Basis for preparation BP-2 - Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances
  1. The undertaking shall provide disclosures in relation to specific circumstances.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the effect of these specific circumstances on the preparation of the sustainability statement.

  3. The undertaking may report this information alongside the disclosures to which they refer.

Time horizons

  1. When the undertaking has deviated from the medium- or long-term time horizons defined by ESRS 1 section 6.4 Definition of short-, medium- and long-term for reporting purposes, it shall describe:
    1. its definitions of medium- or long-term time horizons; and
    2. the reasons for applying those definitions.

Value chain estimation

  1. When metrics include upstream and/or downstream value chain data estimated using indirect sources, such as sector-average data or other proxies, the undertaking shall:
    1. identify the metrics;
    2. describe the basis for preparation;
    3. describe the resulting level of accuracy; and
    4. where applicable, describe the planned actions to improve the accuracy in the future (see ESRS 1 chapter 5 Value chain).

Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty

  1. In accordance with ESRS 1 section 7.2 Sources of estimation and outcome uncertainty, the undertaking shall:
    1. identify the quantitative metrics and monetary amounts it has disclosed that are subject to a high level of measurement uncertainty;
    2. in relation to each quantitative metric and monetary amount identified:
      1. disclose information about the sources of measurement uncertainty (for example, the dependence of the amount on the outcome of a future event, on a measurement technique or on the availability and quality of data from the entity’s upstream and/or downstream value chain); and
      2. disclose the assumptions, approximations and judgements the entity has made in measuring it.
  1. When disclosing forward-looking information, the undertaking may indicate that it considers such information to be uncertain.

Changes in preparation or presentation of sustainability information

  1. When changes in the preparation and presentation of sustainability information occur compared to the previous reporting period(s), (see ESRS 1 section 7.4 Changes in preparation or presentation in sustainability information), the undertaking shall:
    1. explain the changes and the reasons for them, including why the replaced metric provides more useful information;
    2. disclose revised comparative figures, unless it is impracticable to do so. When it is impracticable to adjust comparative information for one or more prior periods, the undertaking shall disclose that fact; and
    3. disclose the difference between the figure disclosed in the preceding period and the revised comparative figure.

Reporting errors in prior periods

  1. When the undertaking identifies material prior period errors (see ESRS 1 section 7.5 Reporting errors in prior periods), it shall disclose:
    1. the nature of the prior period material error;
    2. to the extent practicable, the correction for each prior period included in the sustainability statement; and
    3. if correction of the error is not practicable, the circumstances that led to the existence of that condition.

Disclosures stemming from other legislation or generally accepted sustainability reporting pronouncements

  1. When the undertaking includes in its sustainability statement information stemming from other legislation which requires the undertaking to disclose sustainability information or from generally accepted sustainability reporting standards and frameworks (see ESRS 1 section 8.2 Content and structure of the sustainability statement), in addition to the information prescribed by ESRS, it shall disclose this fact. In case of partial application of other reporting standards or frameworks, the undertaking shall provide a precise reference to the paragraphs of the standard or framework applied.

Incorporation by reference

  1. When the undertaking incorporates information by reference (see ESRS 1 section 9.1 Incorporation by reference), it shall disclose a list of the disclosure requirements of ESRS, or the specific datapoints mandated by a Disclosure Requirement, that have been incorporated by reference. 

Use of phase-In provisions in accordance with Appendix C of ESRS 1  

  1. If an undertaking or group not exceeding on its balance sheet date the average number of 750 employees during the financial year decides to omit the information required by ESRS E4, ESRS S1, ESRS S2, ESRS S3 or ESRS S4 in accordance with Appendix C of ESRS 1, it shall nevertheless disclose whether the sustainability topics covered respectively by ESRS E4, ESRS S1, ESRS S2, ESRS S3 and ESRS S4 have been assessed to be material as a result of the undertaking’s materiality assessment. In addition, if one or more of these topics has been assessed to be material, the undertaking shall, for each material topic:
    1. disclose the list of matters (i.e. topic, sub-topic or sub-sub-topic) in AR 16 ESRS 1 Appendix A that are assessed to be material and briefly describe how the undertaking’s business model and strategy take account of the impacts of the undertaking related to those matters. The undertaking may identify the matter at the level of topic, sub-topic or sub-sub-topic; 
    2. briefly describe any time-bound targets it has set related to the matters in question, the progress it has made towards achieving those targets, and whether its targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems are based on conclusive scientific evidence;
    3. briefly describe its policies in relation to the matters in question;
    4. briefly describe actions it has taken to identify, monitor, prevent, mitigate, remediate or bring an end to actual or potential adverse impacts related to the matters in question, and the result of such actions; and
    5. disclose metrics relevant to the matters in question.

 

Application Requirements

AR 2. The undertaking may disclose whether it relies on any European standards approved by the European Standardisation System (ISO/IEC or CEN/CENELEC standards), as well as the extent to which data and processes that are used for sustainability reporting purposes have been verified by an external assurance provider and found to conform to the corresponding ISO/IEC or CEN/CENELEC standard.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
3 2 - General disclosures 2. Governance GOV-1 - The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the composition of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies, their roles and responsibilities and access to expertise and skills with regard to sustainability matters.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
    1. the composition and diversity of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies;
    2. the roles and responsibilities of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies in exercising oversight of the process to manage material impacts, risks and opportunities, including management’s role in these processes; and
    3. the expertise and skills of its administrative, management and supervisory bodies on sustainability matters or access to such expertise and skills.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose the following information about the composition and diversity of the members of the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies:
    1. the number of executive and non-executive members;
    2. representation of employees and other workers;
    3. experience relevant to the sectors, products and geographic locations of the undertaking;
    4. percentage by gender and other aspects of diversity that the undertaking considers. The board's gender diversity[1] shall be calculated as an average ratio of female to male board members; and
    5. the percentage of independent board members[2]. For undertakings with a unitary board, this corresponds to the percentage of independent non-executive board members. For undertakings with a dual board, it corresponds to the percentage of independent members of the supervisory body.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose the following information about the roles and responsibilities of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies:
    1. the identity of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies (such as a board committee or similar) or individual(s) within a body responsible for oversight of impacts, risks and opportunities;
    2. how each body’s or individual’s responsibilities for impacts, risks and opportunities are reflected in the undertaking’s terms of reference, board mandates and other related policies;
    3. a description of management’s role in the governance processes, controls and procedures used to monitor, manage and oversee impacts, risks and opportunities, including:
      1. whether that role is delegated to a specific management-level position or committee and how oversight is exercised over that position or committee;
      2. information about the reporting lines to the administrative, management and supervisory bodies;
      3. whether dedicated controls and procedures are applied to the management of impacts, risks and opportunities and, if so, how they are integrated with other internal functions; and
    4. how the administrative, management and supervisory bodies and senior executive management oversee the setting of targets related to material impacts, risks and opportunities, and how they monitor progress towards them.

  5. The disclosure shall include a description of how the administrative, management and supervisory bodies determine whether appropriate skills and expertise are available or will be developed to oversee sustainability matters, including:
    1. the sustainability-related expertise that the bodies, as a whole, either directly possess or can leverage, for example through access to experts or training; and
    2. how those skills and expertise relate to the undertaking's material impacts, risks and opportunities.

[1] This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out by indicator #13 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 of 6 April 2022 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 of the European Parliament and of the Council with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Board gender diversity”) and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 of 17 July 2020 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2016/1011 of the European Parliament and of the Council as set out by indicator “Weighted average ratio of female to male board members” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.

[2] This information supports the information needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Weighted average percentage of board members who are independent” in section I of Annex II.

 

Application Requirements

AR 3. In describing the role and responsibilities of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies with regard to sustainability matters, the undertaking may specify:

  1. the aspects of sustainability over which oversight is exercised with regard to the environmental, social and governance matters the undertaking may be facing, including:
    1. any assessment of and changes to sustainability-related aspects of the undertaking’s strategy and business model;
    2. the identification and assessment of material risks, opportunities and impacts; iii. related policies and targets, action plans and dedicated resources; and iv. sustainability reporting;
  2. the form such oversight takes for each of the above aspects: i.e., information, consultation or decision-making; and
  3. the way such oversight is organised and formalised, i.e., processes by which the administrative, management and supervisory bodies engage with these aspects of sustainability.

AR 4. In describing the undertaking’s organisation of governance regarding sustainability matters, a description of complex governance structure may be complemented by their presentation in the form of a diagram.

AR 5. The description of the level of expertise or access to expertise of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies may be substantiated by illustrating the composition of the bodies, including members on whom these bodies rely for expertise to oversee sustainability matters, and how they leverage that expertise as a body. In the description, the undertaking shall consider how the expertise and skills are relevant to the undertaking’s material impacts, risks and opportunities and whether the bodies and/or its members have access to other sources of expertise, such as specific experts and training and other educational initiatives to update and develop sustainability-related expertise within these bodies.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
4 2 - General disclosures 2. Governance GOV-2 - Information provided to and sustainability matters addressed by the undertaking’s administrative bodies
  1. The undertaking shall disclose how the administrative, management and supervisory bodies are informed about sustainability matters and how these matters were addressed during the reporting period.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of how administrative, management and supervisory bodies are informed about sustainability matters, as well as what information and matters they addressed during the reporting period. This in turn allows an understanding of whether the members of these bodies were adequately informed and whether they were able to fulfil their roles.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose the following information:
    1. whether, by whom and how frequently the administrative, management and supervisory bodies, including their relevant committees, are informed about material impacts, risks and opportunities (see Disclosure Requirement IRO–1 - Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities of this Standard), the implementation of due diligence, and the results and effectiveness of policies, actions, metrics and targets adopted to address them;
    2. how the administrative, management and supervisory bodies consider impacts, risks and opportunities when overseeing the undertaking’s strategy, its decisions on major transactions, and its risk management process, including whether they have considered trade-offs associated with those impacts, risks and opportunities; and
    3. a list of the material impacts, risks and opportunities addressed by the administrative, management and supervisory bodies, or their relevant committees during the reporting period.

 

Application Requirements

AR 6. Depending on the undertaking’s structure, the administrative, management and supervisory bodies may focus on overarching targets, while management focuses on the more detailed targets. In this case, the undertaking may disclose how the governance bodies ensure that an appropriate mechanism for performance monitoring is in place.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
5 2 - General disclosures 2. Governance GOV-3 - Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
  1. The undertaking shall disclose information about the integration of its sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes.
  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of whether incentive schemes are offered to members of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies that are linked to sustainability matters.
  3. The undertaking shall disclose the following information about the incentive schemes and remuneration policies linked to sustainability matters for members of the undertaking's administrative, management and supervisory bodies, where they exist:
    1. a description of the key characteristics of the incentive schemes;
    2. whether performance is being assessed against specific sustainability-related targets and/or impacts, and if so, which ones;
    3. whether and how sustainability-related performance metrics are considered as performance benchmarks or included in remuneration policies;
    4. the proportion of variable remuneration dependent on sustainability-related targets and/or impacts; and
    5. the level in the undertaking at which the terms of incentive schemes are approved and updated.

 

Application Requirements

AR 7. For listed undertakings, this Disclosure Requirement should be consistent with the remuneration report prescribed in articles 9a and 9b of Directive 2007/36/EC on the exercise of certain rights of shareholders in listed companies. Subject to the provisions of ESRS 1, paragraphs 119, 120 and 122, a listed undertaking may make a reference to its remuneration report.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
6 2 - General disclosures 2. Governance GOV-4 - Statement on due diligence
  1. The undertaking shall disclose a mapping of the information provided in its sustainability statement about the due diligence process.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to facilitate an understanding of the undertaking’s due diligence process with regard to sustainability matters.

  3. The main aspects and steps of due diligence referred to under ESRS 1 chapter 4 Due diligence are related to a number of cross-cutting and topical Disclosure Requirements under the ESRS. The undertaking shall provide a mapping that explains how and where its application of the main aspects and steps of the due diligence process are reflected in its sustainability statement, to allow a depiction of the actual practices of the undertaking with regard to due diligence[1].

  4. This disclosure requirement does not mandate any specific behavioural requirements with regard to due diligence actions and does not extend or modify the role of administrative, management and supervisory bodies as mandated by other legislation or regulation.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #10 in Table III

 

Application Requirements

AR 8. The mapping required by paragraph 30 may be presented in the form of a table, cross-referencing the core elements of due diligence, for impacts on people and the environment, to the relevant disclosures in the undertaking’s sustainability statement, as set out below.

AR 9. The undertaking may include additional columns to the table below to clearly identify those disclosures that relate to impacts on people and/or the environment given that, in some cases, more than one disclosure may provide information about the same due diligence step.

AR 10. The main references in the international instruments of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises to the core elements of the due diligence process are listed in ESRS 1 chapter 4.

CORE ELEMENTS OF DUE DILIGENCE

PARAGRAPHS IN THE SUSTAINABILITY STATEMENT

a) Embedding due diligence in governance, strategy and business model

 

b) Engaging with affected stakeholders in all key steps of the due diligence

 

c) Identifying and assessing adverse impacts

 

d) Taking actions to address those adverse impacts

 

e) Tracking the effectiveness of these efforts and communicating

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
7 2 - General disclosures 2. Governance GOV-5 – Risk management and internal controls over sustainability reporting
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the main features of its risk management and internal control system in relation to the sustainability reporting process.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s risk management and internal control processes in relation to sustainability reporting.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose the following information:
    1. the scope, main features and components of the risk management and internal control processes and systems in relation to sustainability reporting;
    2. the risk assessment approach followed, including the risk prioritisation methodology;
    3. the main risks identified and their mitigation strategies including related controls;
    4. a description of how the undertaking integrates the findings of its risk assessment and internal controls as regards the sustainability reporting process into relevant internal functions and processes; and
    5. a description of the periodic reporting of the findings referred to in point (d) to the administrative, management and supervisory bodies.

 

Application Requirements

AR 11. This Disclosure Requirement focuses solely on the internal control processes over the sustainability reporting process. The undertaking may consider risks such as the completeness and integrity of the data, the accuracy of estimation results, the availability of upstream and/or downstream value chain data, and the timing of the availability of the information.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
8 2 - General disclosures 3. Strategy SBM-1 - Strategy, business model and value chain
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the elements of its strategy that relate to or impact sustainability matters, its business model and its value chain.
  1. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to describe the key elements of the undertaking’s general strategy that relate to or affect sustainability matters, and the key elements of the undertaking’s business model and value chain, in order to provide an understanding of its exposure to impacts, risks and opportunities and where they originate.
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the following information about the key elements of its general strategy that relate to or affect sustainability matters:
    1. a description of:
      1. significant groups of products and/or services offered, including changes in the reporting period (new/removed products and/or services);
      2. significant markets and/or customer groups served, including changes in the reporting period (new/removed markets and/or customer groups);
      3. headcount of employees by geographical areas; and
      4. where applicable and material, products and services that are banned in certain markets;
    2. a breakdown of total revenue, as included in its financial statements, by significant ESRS sectors. When the undertaking provides segment reporting as required by IFRS 8 Operating segments in its financial statements, this sector revenue information shall be, as far as possible, reconciled with IFRS 8 information;
    3. a list of the additional significant ESRS sectors beyond the ones reflected under paragraph 40(b), such as activities that give rise to intercompany revenues, in which the undertaking develops significant activities, or in which it is or may be connected to material impacts. The identification of these additional ESRS sectors shall be consistent with the way they have been considered by the undertaking when performing its materiality assessment and with the way it discloses material sector-specific information;
    4. where applicable, a statement indicating, together with the related revenues, that the undertaking is active in:
        1. the fossil fuel (coal, oil and gas) sector[1], (i.e., it derives revenues from exploration, mining, extraction, production, processing, storage, refining or distribution, including transportation, storage and trade, of fossil fuels as defined in Article 2, point (62), of Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and the Council[2]), including a disaggregation of revenues derived from coal, from oil and from gas, as well as the revenues derived from Taxonomy-aligned economic activities related to fossil gas as required under Article 8(7)(a) of Commission Delegated Regulation 2021/217818;
        2. ii. chemicals production[3], i.e., its activities fall under Division 20.2 of Annex I to Regulation (EC) No 1893/2006;
        3. iii. controversial weapons[4] (anti-personnel mines, cluster munitions, chemical weapons and biological weapons); and/or
        4. the cultivation and production of tobacco21;
    5. its sustainability-related goals in terms of significant groups of products and services, customer categories, geographical areas and relationships with stakeholders;
    6. an assessment of its current significant products and/or services, and significant markets and customer groups, in relation to its sustainability-related goals; and
    7. the elements of the undertaking’s strategy that relate to or impact sustainability matters, including the main challenges ahead, critical solutions or projects to be put in place, when relevant for sustainability reporting.
  1. If the undertaking is based in an EU Member State that allows for an exemption from the disclosure of the information referred to in Article 18, paragraph 1, sub-point (a) of Directive 2013/34/EU[5], and if the undertaking has made use of that exemption, it may omit the breakdown of revenue by significant ESRS sector required by paragraph 40(b). In this case the undertaking shall nevertheless disclose the list of ESRS sectors that are significant for the undertaking.

  2. The undertaking shall disclose a description of its business model and value chain, including:
    1. its inputs and its approach to gathering, developing and securing those inputs;
    2. its outputs and outcomes in terms of current and expected benefits for customers, investors and other stakeholders; and
    3. the main features of its upstream and downstream value chain and the undertaking’s position in its value chain, including a description of the main business actors (such as key suppliers, customers, distribution channels and end-users) and their relationship to the undertaking. When the undertaking has multiple value chains, the disclosure shall cover the key value chains.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out by indicator #4 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Exposure to companies active in the fossil fuel sector”).

[2] Regulation (EU) 2018/1999 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the Governance of the Energy Union and Climate Action, amending Regulations (EC) No 663/2009 and (EC) No 715/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council, Directives 94/22/EC, 98/70/EC, 2009/31/EC, 2009/73/EC, 2010/31/EU, 2012/27/EU and 2013/30/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council, Council Directives 2009/119/EC and (EU) 2015/652 and repealing Regulation (EU) No 525/2013 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ L 328, 21.12.2018, p. 1).  18 Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 of 6 July 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by specifying the content and presentation of information to be disclosed by undertakings subject to Articles 19a or 29a of Directive 2013/34/EU concerning environmentally sustainable economic activities, and specifying the methodology to comply with that disclosure obligation (OJ L 443, 10.12.2021, p. 9).

[3] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out by indicator #9 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies producing chemicals”).

[4] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out by indicator #14 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288  with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Exposure to controversial weapons (anti-personnel mines, cluster munitions, chemical weapons and biological weapons)”).

21   This information supports the needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 as set out by paragraph b) of article 12.1.

[5] Article 18, paragraph 1, sub-point (a) of Directive 2013/34/EU: “the net turnover broken down by categories of activity and into geographical markets, in so far as those categories and markets differ substantially from one another, taking account of the manner in which the sale of products and the provision of services are organized.” 

 

Application Requirements

AR 12. To provide the information on sectors required by paragraph 40, the undertaking shall map its significant activities in accordance with ESRS sectors. If a code for a sub-sector does not exist, the caption “others” shall be used.

AR 13. For the purposes of the disclosures required in paragraph 40, a group of products and/or services offered, a group of markets and/or customer groups served, or an ESRS sector, is significant for the undertaking if it meets one or both of the following criteria:

  1. it accounts for more than 10 per cent of the undertaking’s revenue;
  2. it is connected with material actual impacts or material potential negative impacts of the undertaking.

AR 14. In preparing disclosures relating to its business model and value chain, the undertaking shall consider:

  1. its key activities, resources, distribution channels and customer segments;
  2. its key business relationships and their key characteristics, including relationships with customers and suppliers;
  3. the cost structure and revenue of its business segments, in line with IFRS 8 disclosure requirements in the financial statement, where applicable;
  4. the potential impacts, risks and opportunities in its significant sector(s) and their possible relationship to its own business model or value chain.

AR 15. Contextual information may be particularly relevant for users of the undertaking’s sustainability statement, to understand to what extent the disclosures include upstream and/or downstream value chain information. The description of the main features of the upstream and/or downstream value chain and where applicable the identification of key value chains should support an understanding of how the undertaking applies the requirements of ESRS 1 chapter 5 and the materiality assessment performed by the undertaking in line with ESRS 1 chapter 3. The description may provide a high-level overview of the key features of upstream and/or downstream value chain entities indicating their relative contribution to the undertaking’s performance and position and explaining how they contribute to the value creation of the undertaking.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
9 2 - General disclosures 3. Strategy SBM-2 - Interests and views of stakeholders
  1. The undertaking shall disclose how the interests and views of its stakeholders are taken into account by the undertaking’s strategy and business model.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of how stakeholders’ interests and views inform the undertaking’s strategy and business model.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose a summarised description of:
    1. its stakeholder engagement, including:
      1. the undertaking’s key stakeholders;
      2. whether engagement with them occurs and for which categories of stakeholders;
      3. how it is organised;
      4. its purpose; and
      5. how its outcome is taken into account by the undertaking;
    2. the undertaking’s understanding of the interests and views of its key stakeholders as they relate to the undertaking’s strategy and business model, to the extent that these were analysed during the undertaking’s due diligence process and/or materiality assessment process (see Disclosure Requirement IRO-1 of this Standard);
    3. where applicable, amendments to its strategy and/or business model, including:
      1. how the undertaking has amended or expects to amend its strategy and/or business model to address the interests and views of its stakeholders;
      2. any further steps that are being planned and in what timeline; and
      3. whether these steps are likely to modify the relationship with and views of stakeholders; and
    4. whether and how the administrative, management and supervisory bodies are informed about the views and interests of affected stakeholders with regard to the undertaking’s sustainability-related impacts.

 

Application Requirements

AR 16. The views and interests of stakeholders that are expressed as part of the undertaking’s engagement with stakeholders through its due diligence process may be relevant to one or more aspects of its strategy or business model. As such, they may affect the undertaking’s decisions regarding the future direction of the strategy or business model.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
10 2 - General disclosures 3. Strategy SBM-3 - Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its material impacts, risks and opportunities and how they interact with its strategy and business model.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the material impacts, risks and opportunities as they result from the undertaking’s materiality assessment and how they originate from and trigger adaptation of the undertaking’s strategy and business model including its resources allocation. The information to be disclosed about the management of the undertaking’s material impacts, risks and opportunities is prescribed in topical ESRS and in sector-specific standards, which shall be applied in conjunction with the Minimum Disclosure Requirements on policies, actions and targets established in this Standard.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose:
    1. a brief description of its material impacts, risks and opportunities resulting from its materiality assessment (see Disclosure Requirement IRO-1 of this standard), including a description of where in its business model, its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain these material impacts, risks and opportunities are concentrated;
    2. the current and anticipated effects of its material impacts, risks and opportunities on its business model, value chain, strategy and decision-making, and how it has responded or plans to respond to these effects, including any changes it has made or plans to make to its strategy or business model as part of its actions to address particular material impacts or risks, or to pursue particular material opportunities;
    3. with reference to the undertaking’s material impacts:
      1. how the undertaking’s material negative and positive impacts affect (or, in the case of potential impacts, are likely to affect) people or the environment;
      2. whether and how the impacts originate from or are connected to the undertaking's strategy and business model;
      3. the reasonably expected time horizons of the impacts; and
      4. whether the undertaking is involved with the material impacts through its activities or because of its business relationships, describing the nature of the activities or business relationships concerned;
    4. the current financial effects of the undertaking’s material risks and opportunities on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows and the material risks and opportunities for which there is a significant risk of a material adjustment within the next annual reporting period to the carrying amounts of assets and liabilities reported in the related financial statements;
    5. the anticipated financial effects of the undertaking’s material risks and opportunities on its financial position, financial performance and cash flows over the short-, medium- and long-term, including the reasonably expected time horizons for those effects. This shall include how the undertaking expects its financial position, financial performance and cash flows to change over the short, medium- and long-term, given its strategy to manage risks and opportunities, taking into consideration:
      1. its investment and disposal plans (for example, capital expenditure, major acquisitions and divestments, joint ventures, business transformation, innovation, new business areas and asset retirements), including plans the undertaking is not contractually committed to; and
      2. its planned sources of funding to implement its strategy.
    6. information about the resilience of the undertaking's strategy and business model regarding its capacity to address its material impacts and risks and to take advantage of its material opportunities. The undertaking shall disclose a qualitative and, when applicable, a quantitative analysis of the resilience, including how the analysis was conducted and the time horizons that were applied as defined in ESRS 1 (see ESRS 1 chapter 6 Time horizons). When providing quantitative information, the undertaking may disclose single amounts or ranges;
    7. changes to the material impacts, risks and opportunities compared to the previous reporting period; and
    8. a specification of those impacts, risks and opportunities that are covered by ESRS Disclosure Requirements as opposed to those covered by the undertaking using additional entity-specific disclosures.
  1. The undertaking may disclose the descriptive information required in paragraph 46 alongside the disclosures provided under the corresponding topical ESRS, in which case it shall still present a statement of its material impacts, risks and opportunities alongside its disclosures prepared under this chapter of ESRS 2.

 

Application Requirements

AR 17. When describing where in its upstream and/or downstream value chain material impacts, risks and opportunities are concentrated, the undertaking shall consider: geographical areas, facilities or types of assets, inputs, outputs and distribution channels.

AR 18. This disclosure may be expressed in terms of a single impact, risk or opportunity or by aggregating groups of material impacts, risks and opportunities, when this provides more relevant information and does not obscure material information.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
11 2 - General disclosures 4. Impacts, risks and opportunities management IRO-1 - Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its process to identify its impacts, risks and opportunities and to assess which ones are material.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the process through which the undertaking identifies impacts, risks and opportunities and assesses their materiality, as the basis for determining the disclosures in its sustainability statement (see ESRS 1 chapter 3 and its related Application Requirements, which set out requirements and principles regarding the process to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities based on the principle of double materiality).

  3. The undertaking shall disclose the following information:
    1. a description of the methodologies and assumptions applied in the described process;
    2. an overview of the process to identify, assess, prioritise and monitor the undertaking’s potential and actual impacts on people and the environment, informed by the undertaking’s due diligence process, including an explanation of whether and how the process:
      1. focusses on specific activities, business relationships, geographies or other factors that give rise to heightened risk of adverse impacts;
      2. considers the impacts with which the undertaking is involved through its own operations or as a result of its business relationships;
      3. includes consultation with affected stakeholders to understand how they may be impacted and with external experts;
      4. prioritises negative impacts based on their relative severity and likelihood, (see ESRS 1 section 3.4 Impact materiality) and, if applicable, positive impacts on their relative scale, scope and likelihood, and determines which sustainability matters are material for reporting purposes, including the qualitative or quantitative thresholds and other criteria used as prescribed by ESRS 1 section 3.4 Impact materiality;
    3. an overview of the process used to identify, assess, prioritise and monitor risks and opportunities that have or may have financial effects. The disclosure shall include:
      1. how the undertaking has considered the connections of its impacts and dependencies with the risks and opportunities that may arise from those impacts and dependencies;
      2. how the undertaking assesses the likelihood, magnitude, and nature of effects of the identified risk and opportunities (such as the qualitative or quantitative thresholds and other criteria used as prescribed by ESRS 1 section 3.5 Financial materiality);
      3. how the undertaking prioritises sustainability-related risks relative to other types of risks, including its use of risk-assessment tools;
    4. a description of the decision-making process and the related internal control procedures;
    5. the extent to which and how the process to identify, assess and manage impacts and risks is integrated into the undertaking’s overall risk management process and used to evaluate the undertaking’s overall risk profile and risk management processes;
    6. the extent to which and how the process to identify, assess and manage opportunities is integrated into the undertaking’s overall management process where applicable;
    7. the input parameters it uses (for example, data sources, the scope of operations covered and the detail used in assumptions); and
    8. whether and how the process has changed compared to the prior reporting period, when the process was modified for the last time and future revision dates of the materiality.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
12 2 - General disclosures 4. Impacts, risks and opportunities management IRO-2 – Disclosure requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statements
  1. The undertaking shall report on the Disclosure Requirements complied with in its sustainability statements.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the Disclosure Requirements included in the undertaking’s sustainability statement and of the topics that have been omitted as not material, as a result of the materiality

  3. The undertaking shall include a list of the Disclosure Requirements complied with in preparing the sustainability statement, following the outcome of the materiality assessment (see ESRS 1 chapter 3), including the page numbers and/or paragraphs where the related disclosures are located in the sustainability statement. This may be presented as a content index. The undertaking shall also include a table of all the datapoints that derive from other EU legislation as listed in Appendix B of this standard, indicating where they can be found in the sustainability statement and including those that the undertaking has assessed as not material, in which case the undertaking shall indicate “Not material” in the table in accordance with ESRS 1 paragraph 35.

  4. If the undertaking concludes that climate change is not material and therefore omits all disclosure requirements in ESRS E1 Climate change, it shall disclose a detailed explanation of the conclusions of its materiality assessment with regard to climate change (see ESRS 2 IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement), including a forward-looking analysis of the conditions that could lead the undertaking to conclude that climate change is material in the future.
  1. If the undertaking concludes that a topic other than climate change is not material and therefore omits all the Disclosure Requirements in the corresponding topical ESRS, it may provide a brief explanation of the conclusions of its materiality assessment for that topic.

  2. The undertaking shall provide an explanation of how it has determined the material information to be disclosed in relation to the impacts, risks and opportunities that it has assessed to be material, including the use of thresholds and/or how it has implemented the criteria in ESRS 1 section 3.2 Material matters and materiality of information. 

 

Application Requirements

AR 19. Notwithstanding the basis for the presentation of the information about sustainability matters included in ESRS 1 chapter 8 Structure of sustainability statement, the undertaking may disclose the list of the Disclosure Requirements complied with in preparing the sustainability statement (see paragraph 54) in the general information part or in other parts of the sustainability statement as it deems appropriate. The undertaking may use a content index, i.e., a tabular list of the Disclosure Requirements included in the sustainability statement, with the indication of where they are located (page/paragraphs).

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%202.pdf None None None
13 E1 - Climate change Governance E1 related to ESRS 2 GOV-3 – Integration of sustainability-related performance in incentive schemes
  1. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how climate-related considerations are factored into the remuneration of members of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies, including if their performance has been assessed against the GHG emission reduction targets reported under Disclosure Requirement E1-4 and the percentage of the remuneration recognised in the current period that is linked to climate related considerations, with an explanation of what the climate considerations are.

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None None
14 E1 - Climate change Strategy E1-1 – Transition plan for climate change mitigation
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its transition plan for climate change mitigation35.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the undertaking’s past, current, and future mitigation efforts to ensure that its strategy and business model are compatible with the transition to a sustainable economy, and with the limiting of global warming to 1.5 °C in line with the Paris Agreement and with the objective of achieving climate neutrality by 2050 and, where relevant, the undertaking’s exposure to coal, oil and gas-related activities.

  3. The information required by paragraph 14 shall include:
    1. by reference to GHG emission reduction targets (as required by Disclosure Requirement E1-4), an explanation of how the undertaking’s targets are compatible with the limiting of global warming to 1.5°C in line with the Paris Agreement;
    2. by reference to GHG emission reduction targets (as required by Disclosure Requirement E1-4) and the climate change mitigation actions (as required by Disclosure Requirement E1-3), an explanation of the decarbonisation levers identified, and key actions planned, including changes in the undertaking’s product and service portfolio and the adoption of new technologies in its own operations, or the upstream and/or downstream value chain;
    3. by reference to the climate change mitigation actions (as required by Disclosure Requirement E1-3), an explanation and quantification of the undertaking’s investments and funding supporting the implementation of its transition plan, with a reference to the key performance indicators of taxonomy-aligned CapEx, and where relevant the CapEx plans, that the undertaking discloses in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178;
    4. a qualitative assessment of the potential locked-in GHG emissions from the undertaking’s key assets and products. This shall include an explanation of if and how these emissions may jeopardise the achievement of the undertaking’s GHG emission reduction targets and drive transition risk, and if applicable, an explanation of the undertaking’s plans to manage its GHG-intensive and energyintensive assets and products;
    5. for undertakings with economic activities that are covered by delegated regulations on climate adaptation or mitigation under the Taxonomy Regulation, an explanation of any objective or plans (CapEX, CapEx plans, OpEX) that the undertaking has for aligning its economic activities (revenues, CapEx, OpEx) with the criteria established in Commission Delegated Regulation 2021/213936;
    6. if applicable, a disclosure of significant CapEx amounts invested during the reporting period related to coal, oil and gas-related economic activities;37
    7. a disclosure on whether or not the undertaking is excluded from the EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks;38
    8. an explanation of how the transition plan is embedded in and aligned with the undertaking’s overall business strategy and financial planning;
    9. whether the transition plan is approved by the administrative, management and supervisory bodies; and
    10. an explanation of the undertaking’s progress in implementing the transition plan.
  1. In case the undertaking does not have a transition plan in place, it shall indicate whether and, if so, when it will adopt a transition plan.

[35]This information is aligned with the Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU Climate Law), Article 2 (1); and with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation), Article 2.

 [36] Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 of 4 June 2021 supplementing Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing the technical screening criteria for determining the conditions under which an economic activity qualifies as contributing substantially to climate change mitigation or climate change adaptation and for determining whether that economic activity causes no significant harm to any of the other environmental objectives (OJ L 442, 9.12.2021, p. 1).

 [37] The CapEx amounts considered are related to the following NACE codes:

  1. B.05 - Mining of coal and lignite, B.06 Extraction of crude petroleum and natural gas (limited to crude petroleum), B.09.1 Support activities for petroleum and natural gas extraction (limited to crude petroleum),
  2. C.19 - Manufacture of coke and refined petroleum products,
  3. D35.1 - Electric power generation, transmission and distribution,
  4. D35.3 - Steam and air conditioning supply (limited to coal-fired and oil-fired power and/or heat generation),
  5. G.46.71 - Wholesale of solid, liquid and gaseous fuels and related products (limited to solid and liquid fuels).

For gas-related activities, the NACE code definition addresses activities with direct GHG emissions that are higher than 270 gCO2/KWh.

[38] This disclosure requirement is included consistent with the requirements in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 template I climate change transition risk; and is aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation), Articles 12.1 (d) to (g) and 12.2.

 

Application Requirements

AR1. A transition plan relates to the undertaking’s efforts in climate change mitigation. When disclosing its transition plan, the undertaking is expected to provide a high-level explanation of how it will adjust its strategy and business model to ensure compatibility with the transition to a sustainable economy and with the limiting of global warming to 1.5°C in line with the Paris Agreement (or an updated inter   national agreement on climate change) and the objective of achieving climate neutrality by 2050 with no or limited overshoot as established in Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 (European Climate Law), and where applicable, how it will adjust its exposure to coal, and oil and gas-related activities. 

AR2. Sectoral pathways have not yet been defined by the public policies for all sectors. Hence, the disclosure under paragraph 16 (a) on the compatibility of the transition plan with the objective of limiting global warming to 1.5°C should be understood as the disclosure of the undertaking’s GHG emissions reduction target. The disclosure under paragraph 16 (a) shall be benchmarked in relation to a pathway to 1.5°C. This benchmark should be based on either a sectoral decarbonisation pathway if available for the undertaking’s sector or an economy-wide scenario bearing in mind its limitations (i.e., it is a simple translation of emission reduction objectives from the state to undertaking level). This AR should be read also in conjunction with AR 26 and AR 27 and the sectoral decarbonisation pathways they refer to.

AR3. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 16(d) the undertaking may consider:

  1. the cumulative locked-in GHG emissions associated with key assets from the reporting year until 2030 and 2050 in tCO2 This will be assessed as the sum of the estimated Scopes 1 and 2 GHG emissions over the operating lifetime of the active and firmly planned key assets. Key assets are those owned or controlled by the undertaking, and they consist of existing or planned assets (such as stationary or mobile installations, facilities, and equipment) that are sources of either significant direct or energy-indirect GHG emissions. Firmly planned key assets are those that the undertaking will most likely deploy within the next 5 years.
  2. the cumulative locked-in GHG emissions associated with the direct use-phase GHG emissions of sold products in tCO2eq, assessed as the sales volume of products in the reporting year multiplied by the sum of estimated direct use-phase GHG emissions over their expected lifetime. This requirement only applies if the undertaking has identified the Scope 3 category “use of sold products” as significant under Disclosure Requirement E1-6 paragraph 51; and
  3. an explanation of the plans to manage, i.e., to transform, decommission or phase out its GHG-intensive and energy-intensive assets and products.

AR4. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 16 (e), the undertaking shall explain how the alignment of its economic activities with the provisions of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139 is expected to evolve over time to support its transition to a sustainable economy. In doing so, the undertaking shall take account of the key performance indicators required to be disclosed under Article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 (in particular taxonomy-aligned revenue and CapEx and, if applicable, CapEx plans). 

AR5. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 16 (f), the undertaking shall state whether or not it is excluded from the EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks in accordance with the exclusion criteria stated in Articles 12.1 (d) to (g)53 and 12.2 of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Standards Regulation)54.

53Article 12.1 of the Climate Benchmark Standards Regulation states that “Administrators of EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks shall exclude the following companies:

  1. companies that derive 1% or more of their revenues from exploration, mining, extraction, distribution or refining of hard coal and lignite; or
  2. companies that derive 10% or more of their revenues from exploration, extraction, distribution or refining of oil fuels; or
  3. companies that derive 50% or more of their revenues from exploration, extraction, manufacturing or distribution of gaseous fuels; or
  4. companies that derive 50% or more of their revenues from electricity generation with a GHG intensity of more than 100 g CO2 e/KWh.

Article 12.2 states that “Administrators of EU Paris-aligned Benchmarks shall exclude from those benchmarks any companies that are found or estimated by them or by external data providers to significantly harm one or more of the environmental objectives referred to in Article 9 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 of the European Parliament and of the Council, in accordance with the rules on estimations laid down in Article 13(2) of this Regulation.”.

54This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - template 1 climate change transition risk.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None None
15 E1 - Climate change Strategy E1 related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
  1. The undertaking shall explain for each material climate-related risk it has identified, whether the entity considers the risk to be a climate-related physical risk or climate-related transition risk.

  2. The undertaking shall describe the resilience of its strategy and business model in relation to climate change. This description shall include:
    1. the scope of the resilience analysis;
    2. how and when the resilience analysis has been conducted, including the use of climate scenario analysis as referenced in the Disclosure Requirement related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 and the related application requirement paragraphs; and
    3. the results of the resilience analysis including the results from the use of scenario analysis.

 

Application Requirements

AR 6. When disclosing the information on the scope of the resilience analysis as required under paragraph 19 (a), the undertaking shall explain which part of its own operations and upstream and downstream value chain as well as which material physical risks and transition risks may have been excluded from the analysis.

AR 7. When disclosing the information on how the resilience analysis has been conducted as required under paragraph 19 (b), the undertaking shall explain:

  1. the critical assumptions about how the transition to a lower-carbon and resilient economy will affect its surrounding macroeconomic trends, energy consumption and mix, and technology deployment assumptions;
  2. the time horizons applied and their alignment with the climate and business scenarios considered for determining material physical and transition risks (paragraphs AR 11 to AR 12) and setting GHG emissions reduction targets (reported under Disclosure Requirement E1-4); and
  3. how the estimated anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks (as required by Disclosure Requirement E1-9) as well as the mitigation actions and resources (disclosed under Disclosure Requirement E1-3) were considered.

AR 8. When disclosing the information on the results of the resilience analysis as required under paragraph 19 (c), the undertaking shall explain:

  1. the areas of uncertainties of the resilience analysis and to what extent the assets and business activities at risk are considered within the definition of the undertaking’s strategy, investment decisions, and current and planned mitigation actions;
  2. the ability of the undertaking to adjust or adapt its strategy and business model to climate change over the short-, medium- and long-term, including securing ongoing access to finance at an affordable cost of capital, the ability to redeploy, upgrade or decommission existing assets, shifting its products and services portfolio, or reskilling its workforce.
  •  
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None None
16 E1 - Climate change Impacts, risks and opportunities management E1 related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall describe the process to identify and assess climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities. This description shall include its process in relation to:
    1. impacts on climate change, in particular, the undertaking’s GHG emissions (as required by Disclosure Requirement ESRS E1-6);
    2. climate-related physical risks in own operations and along the upstream and downstream value chain, in particular:
      1. the identification of climate-related hazards, considering at least high emission climate scenarios; and
      2. the assessment of how its assets and business activities may be exposed and are sensitive to these climate-related hazards, creating gross physical risks for the undertaking.
    3. climate-related transition risks and opportunities in own operations and along the upstream and downstream value chain, in particular:
      1. the identification of climate-related transition events, considering at least a climate scenario in line with limiting global warming to 1.5°C with no or limited overshoot; and
      2. the assessment of how its assets and business activities may be exposed to these climate-related transition events, creating gross transition risks or opportunities for the undertaking.
      3. When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 20 (b)and 20 (c) the undertaking shall explain how it has used climate-related scenario analysis, including a range of climate scenarios, to inform the identification and assessment of physical risks and transition risks and opportunities over the short-, medium- and long-term.
  1. When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 20 (b) and 20 (c) the undertaking shall explain how it has used climate-related scenario analysis, including a range of climate scenarios, to inform the identification and assessment of physical risks and transition risks and opportunities over the short-, medium- and long-term.

 

Application Requirements

AR 9. When disclosing the information on the processes to identify and assess climate impacts as required under paragraph 20 (a), the undertaking shall explain how it has:

  1. screened its activities and plans in order to identify actual and potential future GHG emission sources and, if applicable, drivers for other climate-related impacts (e.g., emissions of black carbon or tropospheric ozone or land-use change) in own operations and along the value chain; and
  2. assessed its actual and potential impacts on climate change (i.e., its total GHG emissions).

AR 10. The undertaking may link the information disclosed under paragraphs 20 (a) and AR 9 to the information disclosed under the following Disclosure Requirements: Disclosure Requirement E1-1, paragraph 16 (d) on locked-in GHG emissions; Disclosure Requirement E1-4 and Disclosure Requirement E1-6.

AR 11. When disclosing the information on the processes to identify and assess physical risks as required under paragraph 20 (b), the undertaking shall explain whether and how:

  1. it has identified climate-related hazards (see table below) over the short-, medium- and long-term and screened whether its assets and business activities may be exposed to these hazards;
  2. it has defined short-, medium- and long-term time horizons and how these definitions are linked to the expected lifetime of its assets, strategic planning horizons and capital allocation plans;
  3. it has assessed the extent to which its assets and business activities may be exposed and are sensitive to the identified climate-related hazards, taking into consideration the likelihood, magnitude and duration of the hazards as well as the geospatial coordinates (such as Nomenclature of Territorial Units of Statistics- NUTS for the EU territory) specific to the undertaking’s locations and supply chains; and
  4. the identification of climate-related hazards and the assessment of exposure and sensitivity are informed by high emissions climate scenarios, which may, for example, be based on IPCC SSP5-8.5, relevant regional climate projections based on these emission scenarios, or NGFS (Network for Greening the Financial System) climate scenarios with high physical risk such as “Hot house world” or “Too little, too late”. For general requirements regarding climate-related scenario analysis see paragraphs 18, 19, AR 13 to AR 15. 

Classification of climate-related hazards

(Source: Commission delegated regulation (EU) 2021/2139)

 

Temperature-related

Wind-related

Water-related

Solid mass- related

Chronic

Changing temperature (air, freshwater, marine water)

Changing wind patterns

Changing precipitation patterns and types (rain, hail, snow/ice)

Coastal erosion

Heat stress

 

Precipitation or hydrological variability

Soil degradation

Temperature variability

 

Ocean acidification

Soil erosion

Permafrost thawing

 

Saline intrusion

Solifluction

 

 

Sea level rise

 

 

 

Water stress

 

Acute

Heat wave

Cyclones, hurricanes,  typhoons

Drought

Avalanche

Cold wave/frost

Storms (including blizzards, dust, and sandstorms)

Heavy precipitation (rain, hail, snow/ice)

Landslide

Wildfire

Tornado

Flood (coastal, fluvial, pluvial, ground water)

Subsidence

 

 

Glacial lake outburst

 

AR 12. When disclosing the information on the processes to identify transition risks and opportunities as required under paragraph 20 (c), the undertaking shall explain whether and how it has:

  1. identified transition events (see the table with examples below) over the short-, medium- and long-term and screened whether its assets and business activities may be exposed to these In case of transition risks and opportunities, what is considered long-term may cover more than 10 years and may be aligned with climate-related public policy goals;
  2. assessed the extent to which its assets and business activities may be exposed and are sensitive to the identified transition events, taking into consideration the likelihood, magnitude and duration of the transition events;
  3. informed the identification of transition events and the assessment of exposure by climate-related scenario analysis, considering at least a scenario consistent with the Paris Agreement and limiting climate change to 1.5°C, for example, based on scenarios of the International Energy Agency (Net zero Emissions by 2050, Sustainable Development Scenario, etc), or NGFS (Network for Greening the Financial System) climate scenarios. For the general requirements related to climate-related scenario analysis see paragraphs 18, 19, AR 13 to AR 15; and
  4. identified assets and business activities that are incompatible with or need significant efforts to be compatible with a transition to a climate-neutral economy (for example, due to significant locked-in GHG emissions or incompatibility with the requirements for Taxonomy-alignment under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2139).

Examples of climate-related transition events (examples based on TCFD classification)

Policy and legal

Technology

Market

Reputation

Increased pricing of GHG emissions

Substitution of existing products and services with lower emissions options

Changing customer behaviour

Shifts in consumer preferences

Enhanced emissions- reporting obligations

successful investment in new technologies

Uncertainty in market signals

Stigmatization of sector

Mandates on and regulation of existing products and services

Costs of transition to lower emissions technology

Increased cost of raw materials

Increased stakeholder concern

Mandates on and regulation of existing production processes

 

 

Negative stakeholder feedback

Exposure to litigation

 

 

 

Climate-related scenario analysis

AR 13. When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 19, 20, 21, AR 10 and AR 11, the undertaking shall explain how it has used climate-related scenario analysis that is commensurate to its circumstances to inform the identification and assessment of physical and transition risks and opportunities over the short-, medium- and long-term, including:

  1. which scenarios were used, their sources and alignment with state-of-the-art science;
  2. narratives, time horizons, and endpoints used with a discussion of why it believes the range of scenarios used covers its plausible risks and uncertainties;
  3. the key forces and drivers taken into consideration in each scenario and why these are relevant to the undertaking, for example, policy assumptions, macroeconomic trends, energy usage and mix, and technology assumptions; and
  4. key inputs and constraints of the scenarios, including their level of detail (e.g., whether the analysis of physical climate-related risks is based on geospatial coordinates specific to the undertaking’s locations or national- or regional-level broad data).

AR 14. When conducting scenario analysis, the undertaking may consider the following guidance: TCFD Technical Supplement on “The Use of Scenario Analysis in Disclosure of Climate- Related Risks and Opportunities” (2017); TCFD “Guidance on Scenario Analysis for Non- Financial Companies” (2020); ISO 14091:2021 “Adaptation to climate change — Guidelines on vulnerability, impacts and risk assessment”; any other recognised industry standards such as NGFS (Network for Greening the Financial System); and EU, national, regional and local regulations.

AR 15. The undertaking shall briefly explain how the climate scenarios used are compatible with the critical climate-related assumptions made in the financial statements.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None None
17 E1 - Climate change Impacts, risks and opportunities management E1-2 – Policies related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
  1. The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to climate change mitigation and adaptation.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of its material climate change mitigation and adaptation impacts, risks and opportunities.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 22 shall contain the information on the policies the undertaking has in place to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to climate change mitigation and adaptation in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters.

  4. The undertaking shall indicate whether and how its policies address the following areas:
    1. climate change mitigation;
    2. climate change adaptation;
    3. energy efficiency;
    4. renewable energy deployment; and
    5. other

 

Application Requirements

AR 16. Policies related to either climate change mitigation or climate adaptation may be disclosed separately as their objectives, people involved, actions and resources needed to implement them are different.

AR 17. Policies related to climate change mitigation address the management of the undertaking’s GHG emissions, GHG removals and transition risks over different time horizons, in its own operations and/or in the upstream and downstream value chain. The requirement under paragraph 14 may relate to stand-alone climate change mitigation policies as well as relevant policies on other matters that indirectly support climate change mitigation including training policies, procurement or supply chain policies, investment policies or product development policies.

AR 18. Policies related to climate change adaptation address the management of the undertaking’s physical climate risks and of its transition risks related to climate change adaptation. The requirement under paragraphs 22 and 25 may relate to stand-alone climate change adaptation policies as well as relevant policies on other matters that indirectly support climate change adaptation including training policies, and emergency or health and safety policies.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None MDR-P
18 E1 - Climate change Impacts, risks and opportunities management E1-3 – Actions and resources in relation to climate change policies
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its climate change mitigation and adaptation actions and the resources allocated for their implementation.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the key actions taken and planned to achieve climate-related policy objectives and targets.

  3. The description of the actions and resources related to climate change mitigation and adaptation shall follow the principles stated in ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters.

  4. In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-A, the undertaking shall:
    1. when listing key actions taken in the reporting year and planned for the future, present the climate change mitigation actions by decarbonisation lever including the nature- based solutions;
    2. when describing the outcome of the actions for climate change mitigation, include the achieved and expected GHG emission reductions; and
    3. relate significant monetary amounts of CapEx and OpEx required to implement the actions taken or planned to:
      1. the relevant line items or notes in the financial statements;
      2. the key performance indicators required under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178; and iii. if applicable, the CapEx plan required by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178.

 

Application Requirements

AR 19. When disclosing the information on actions as required under paragraphs 29 (a) and 29 (b), the undertaking may:

  1. disclose its key actions taken and/or plans to implement climate change mitigation and adaptation policies in its single or separate actions;
  2. aggregate types of mitigation actions (decarbonisation levers) such as energy efficiency, electrification, fuel switching, use of renewable energy, products change, and supply-chain decarbonisation that fit the undertakings' specific actions;
  3. disclose the list of key mitigation actions alongside the measurable targets (as required by Disclosure Requirement E1-4) with disaggregation by decarbonisation levers; and
  4. disclose the climate change adaptation actions by type of adaptation solution such as nature-based adaptation, engineering, or technological solutions.

AR 20. When disclosing the information on resources as required under paragraph 29 (c), the undertaking shall only disclose the significant OpEx and CapEx amounts required for the implementation of the actions as the purpose of this information is to demonstrate the credibility of its actions rather than to reconcile the disclosed amounts to the financial statements. The disclosed CapEx and OpEx amounts shall be the additions made to both tangible and intangible assets during the current financial year as well as the planned additions for future periods of implementing the actions. The disclosed amounts shall only be the incremental financial investments directly contributing to the achievement of the undertaking’s targets.

AR 21. In line with the requirements of ESRS 2 MDR-A, the undertaking shall explain if and to what extent its ability to implement the actions depends on the availability and allocation of resources. Ongoing access to finance at an affordable cost of capital can be critical for the implementation of the undertaking’s actions, which include its adjustments to supply/demand changes or its related acquisitions and significant research and development (R&D) investments.

AR 22. The amounts of OpEx and CapEx required for the implementation of the actions disclosed under paragraph 29 (c) shall be consistent with the key performance indicators (CapEx and OpEx key performance indicators) and, if applicable, the CapEx plan required by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178. The undertaking shall explain any potential differences between the significant OpEx and CapEx amounts disclosed under this Standard and the key performance indicators disclosed under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178 due to, for instance, the disclosure of non-eligible economic activities as defined in that delegated regulation. The undertaking may structure its actions by economic activity to compare its OpEx and CapEx, and if applicable its OpEx and/or CapEx plans to its Taxonomy-aligned key performance indicators.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None MDR-A
19 E1 - Climate change Metrics and targets E1-4 – Targets related to climate change mitigation and adaptation
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the climate-related targets it has set.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the targets the undertaking has set to support its climate change mitigation and adaptation policies and address its material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities.

  3. The disclosure of the targets required in paragraph 30 shall contain the information required in ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets.

  4. For the disclosure required by paragraph 30, the undertaking shall disclose whether and how it has set GHG emissions reduction targets and/or any other targets to manage material climate-related impacts, risks and opportunities, for example, renewable energy deployment, energy efficiency, climate change adaptation, and physical or transition risk
    mitigation.

  5. If the undertaking has set GHG emission reduction targets[1], ESRS 2 MDR-T and the following requirements shall apply:
    1. GHG emission reduction targets shall be disclosed in absolute value (either in tonnes of CO2eq or as a percentage of the emissions of a base year) and, where relevant, in intensity value;
    2. GHG emission reduction targets shall be disclosed for Scope 1, 2, and 3 GHG emissions, either separately or combined. The undertaking shall specify, in case of combined GHG emission reduction targets, which GHG emission Scopes (1, 2 and/or 3) are covered by the target, the share related to each respective GHG emission Scope and which GHGs are covered. The undertaking shall explain how the consistency of these targets with its GHG inventory boundaries is ensured (as required by Disclosure Requirement E1-6). The GHG emission reduction targets shall be gross targets, meaning that the undertaking shall not include GHG removals, carbon credits or avoided emissions as a means of achieving the GHG emission reduction targets;
    3. the undertaking shall disclose its current base year and baseline value, and from 2030 onwards, update the base year for its GHG emission reduction targets after every five-year period thereafter. The undertaking may disclose the past progress made in meeting its targets before its current base year provided that this information is consistent with the requirements of this Standard;
    4. GHG emission reduction targets shall at least include target values for the year 2030 and, if available, for the year 2050. From 2030, target values shall be set after every 5 year period thereafter;
    5. the undertaking shall state whether the GHG emission reduction targets are science- based and compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C. The undertaking shall state which framework and methodology has been used to determine these targets including whether they are derived using a sectoral decarbonisation pathway and what the underlying climate and policy scenarios are and whether the targets have been externally assured. As part of the critical assumptions for setting GHG emission reduction targets, the undertaking shall briefly explain how it has considered future developments (e.g., changes in sales volumes, shifts in customer preferences and demand, regulatory factors, and new technologies) and how these will potentially impact both its GHG emissions and emissions reductions; and
    6. the undertaking shall describe the expected decarbonisation levers and their overall quantitative contributions to achieve the GHG emission reduction targets (e.g., energy or material efficiency and consumption reduction, fuel switching, use of renewable energy, phase out or substitution of product and process).

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 (SFDR) because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #4 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies without carbon emission reduction initiatives”); and is aligned with the Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation), Article 6.

 

Application Requirements

AR 23. Under paragraph 34 (a), the undertaking may disclose GHG emission reduction targets in intensity value. Intensity targets are formulated as ratios of GHG emissions relative to a unit of physical activity or economic output. Relevant units of activity or output are referred to in ESRS sector-specific standards. In cases where the undertaking has only set a GHG intensity reduction target, it shall nevertheless disclose the associated absolute values for the target year and interim target year(s). This may result in a situation where an undertaking is required to disclose an increase of absolute GHG emissions for the target year and interim target year(s), for example because it anticipates organic growth of its business.

AR 24. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 34 (b), the undertaking shall specify the share of the target related to each respective GHG emission Scope (1, 2 or 3). The undertaking shall state the method used to calculate Scope 2 GHG emissions included in the target (i.e., either the location-based or market-based method). If the boundary of the GHG emission reduction target diverges from that of the GHG emissions reported under Disclosure Requirement E1-6, the undertaking shall disclose which gases are covered, the respective percentage of Scope 1, 2, 3 and total GHG emissions covered by the target. For the GHG emission reduction targets of its subsidiaries, the undertaking shall analogously apply these requirements at the level of the subsidiary.

AR 25. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 34(c) on base year and baseline value:

  1. the undertaking shall briefly explain how it has ensured that the baseline value against which the progress towards the target is measured is representative in terms of the activities covered and the influences from external factors (e.g., temperature anomalies in a certain year influencing the amount of energy consumption and related GHG emissions). This can be done by the normalisation of the baseline value, or, by using a baseline value that is derived from a 3-year average if this increases the representativeness and allows a more faithful representation;
  2. the baseline value and base year shall not be changed unless significant changes in either the target or reporting boundary occur. In such a case, the undertaking shall explain how the new baseline value affects the new target, its achievement and presentation of progress over To foster comparability, when setting new targets, the undertaking shall select a recent base year that does not precede the first reporting year of the new target period by longer than 3 years. For example, for 2030 as the target year and a target period between 2025 and 2030, the base year shall be selected from the period between 2022 and 2025;
  3. the undertaking shall update its base year from 2030 and after every 5-year period thereafter. This means that before 2030, the base years chosen by undertakings’ may be either the currently applied base year for existing targets or the first year of application of the sustainability reporting requirements as set out in Article 5(2) of Directive (EU) 2022/2464 (2024, 2025 or 2026) and, after 2030, every 5 years (2030, 2035, etc); and
  4. when presenting climate-related targets, the undertaking may disclose the progress in meeting these targets made before its current base year. In doing so, the undertaking shall, to the greatest extent possible, ensure that the information on past progress is consistent with the requirements of this In the case of methodological differences, for example, regarding target boundaries, the undertaking shall provide a brief explanation for these differences.

AR 26. When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 34 (d) and 34 (e), the undertaking shall present the information over the target period with reference to a sector- specific, if available, or a cross-sector emission pathway compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C. For this purpose, the undertaking shall calculate a 1.5°C aligned reference target value for Scope 1 and 2 (and, if applicable, a separate one for Scope 3) against which its own GHG emission reduction targets or interim targets in the respective Scopes can be compared.

AR 27. The reference target value may be calculated by multiplying the GHG emissions in the base year with either a sector-specific (sectoral decarbonisation methodology) or cross-sector (contraction methodology) emission reduction factor. These emission reduction factors can be derived from different sources. The undertaking should ensure that the source used is based on an emission reduction pathway compatible with limiting global warming to 1.5°C.

AR 28. The emission reduction factors are subject to further development. Consequently, undertakings are encouraged to only use updated publicly available information.

 

2030

2050

Cross-sector (ACA) reductions pathway based on the year 2020 as the reference year

 

-42%

 

-90%

AR 29. The reference target value is dependent on the base year and baseline emissions of the undertaking’s GHG emission reduction target. As a result, the reference target value for undertakings with a recent base year or from higher baseline emissions may be less challenging to achieve than it will be for undertakings that have already taken ambitious past actions to reduce GHG emissions. Therefore, undertakings that have in the past achieved GHG emissions reductions compatible with either a 1.5°C-aligned cross-sector or sector- specific pathway, may adjust their baseline emissions accordingly to determine the reference target value. Accordingly, if the undertaking is adjusting the baseline emissions to determine the reference target value, it shall not consider GHG emission reductions that precede the year 2020 and it shall provide appropriate evidence of its past achieved GHG emission reduction.

AR 30. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 34 (f), the undertaking shall explain:

  1. by reference to its climate change mitigation actions, the decarbonisation levers and their estimated quantitative contributions to the achievement of its GHG emission reduction targets broken down by each Scope (1, 2 and 3);
  2. whether it plans to adopt new technologies and the role of these to achieve its GHG emission reduction targets; and
  3. whether and how it has considered a diverse range of climate scenarios, at least including a climate scenario compatible with limiting global warming to 5°C, to detect relevant environmental-, societal-, technology-, market- and policy-related developments and determine its decarbonisation levers.

AR 31. The undertaking may present its GHG emission reduction targets together with its climate change mitigation actions (see paragraph AR 19) as a table or graphical pathway showing developments over time. The following figure and table provide examples combining targets and decarbonization levers:

[the first example is in a format that cannot be replicated in this table - please refer to original publication]

 

Base year (e.g., 2025)

2030 target

2035 target

Up to 2050 target

GHG emissions (ktCO2eq)

100

60

40

 

 

Energy efficiency and consumption reduction

-

-10

-4

 

 

Material efficiency and consumption reduction

-

-5

-

 

 

Fuel switching

-

-2

-

 

 

Electrification

-

-

-10

 

 

Use of renewable energy

-

-10

-3

 

 

Phase out, substitution or modification of product

-

-8

-

 

 

Phase out, substitution or modification of process

-

-5

-3

 

 

Other

-

-

 

 

 

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None MDR-T
20 E1 - Climate change Metrics and targets E1-5 – Energy consumption and mix
  1. The undertaking shall provide information on its energy consumption and mix.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s total energy consumption in absolute value, improvement in energy efficiency, exposure to coal, oil and gas-related activities, and the share of renewable energy in its overall energy mix.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 35 shall include the total energy consumption in MWh related to own operations disaggregated by:
    1. total energy consumption from fossil sources[1];
    2. total energy consumption from nuclear sources;
    3. total energy consumption from renewable sources disaggregated by:
      1. fuel consumption for renewable sources including biomass (also comprising industrial and municipal waste of biologic origin), biofuels, biogas, hydrogen from renewable sources[2], etc.;
      2. consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources; and
      3. consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy.
  1. The undertaking with operations in high climate impact sectors[3] shall further disaggregate their total energy consumption from fossil sources by:
    1. fuel consumption from coal and coal products;
    2. fuel consumption from crude oil and petroleum products;
    3. fuel consumption from natural gas;
    4. fuel consumption from other fossil sources;
    5. consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, or cooling from fossil sources;
  1. In addition, where applicable, the undertaking shall disaggregate and disclose separately its non-renewable energy production and renewable energy production in MWh.[4]
Energy intensity based on net revenue[5]
  1. The undertaking shall provide information on the energy intensity (total energy consumption per net revenue) associated with activities in high climate impact sectors.

  2. The disclosure on energy intensity required by paragraph 40 shall only be derived from the total energy consumption and net revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors.

  3. The undertaking shall specify the high climate impact sectors that are used to determine the energy intensity required by paragraph 40.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose the reconciliation to the relevant line item or notes in the financial statements of the net revenue amount from activities in high climate impact sectors (the denominator in the calculation of the energy intensity required by paragraph 40).

 

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #5 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Share of non-renewable energy consumption and production”). The breakdown serves as a reference for an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #5 in Table II of the same Annex (“Breakdown of energy consumption by type of non-renewable sources of energy”).

[2] Compliant with the requirements in delegated acts for hydrogen from renewable sources: Commission Delegated Regulation of 10 February 2023 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a Union methodology setting out detailed rules for the production of renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin; and Commission Delegated Regulation of 10 February 2023 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a minimum threshold for greenhouse gas emissions savings of recycled carbon fuels and by specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin and from recycled carbon fuel. 

[3] High climate impact sectors are those listed in NACE Sections A to H and Section L (as defined in Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288).

[4] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #5 in Table I of Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Share of non-renewable energy consumption and production”).

[5] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #6 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Energy consumption intensity per high climate impact sector”).

 

Application Requirements

Calculation guidance

AR 32. When preparing the information on energy consumption required under paragraph 35, the undertaking shall:

  1. only report energy consumed from processes owned or controlled by the undertaking applying the same perimeter applied for reporting GHG Scopes 1 and 2 emissions;
  2. exclude feedstocks and fuels that are not combusted for energy purposes. The undertaking that consumes fuel as feedstocks can disclose information on this consumption separately from the required disclosures;
  3. ensure all quantitative energy-related information is reported in either Mega-Watt- hours (MWh) in Lower Heating Value or net calorific value. If raw data of energy- related information is only available in energy units other than MWh (such as Giga- Joules (GJ) or British Thermal Units (Btu)), in volume units (such as cubic feet or gallons) or in mass units (such as kilograms or pounds), they shall be converted to MWh using suitable conversion factors (see for example Annex II of the Fifth Assessment IPCC report). Conversion factors for fuels shall be made transparent and applied in a consistent manner;
  4. ensure all quantitative energy-related information is reported as final energy consumption, referring to the amount of energy the undertaking actually consumes using for example the table in Annex IV of Directive 2012/27 of the European Parliament and of the Council (55) on energy efficiency;
  5. avoid double counting fuel consumption when disclosing self-generated energy consumption. If the undertaking generates electricity from either a non-renewable or renewable fuel source and then consumes the generated electricity, the energy consumption shall be counted only once under fuel consumption;
  6. not offset energy consumption even if onsite generated energy is sold to and used by a third party;
  7. not count energy that is sourced from within the organisational boundary under “purchased or acquired” energy;
  8. account for steam, heat or cooling received as “waste energy” from a third party’s industrial processes under “purchased or acquired” energy;
  9. account for renewable hydrogen (56) as a renewable fuel. Hydrogen that is not completely derived from renewable sources shall be included under “fuel consumption from other non-renewable sources”; and
  10. adopt a conservative approach when splitting the electricity, steam, heat or cooling between renewable and non-renewable sources based on the approach applied to calculate market-based Scope 2 GHG The undertaking shall only consider these energy consumptions as deriving from renewable sources if the origin of the purchased energy is clearly defined in the contractual arrangements with its suppliers (renewable power purchasing agreement, standardised green electricity tariff, market instruments like Guarantee of Origin from renewable sources in Europe (57) or similar instruments like Renewable Energy Certificates in the US and Canada, etc.).

55 Directive 2012/27/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 on energy efficiency, amending Directives 2009/125/EC and 2010/30/EU and repealing Directives 2004/8/EC and 2006/32/EC (OJ L 315, 14.11.2012, p. 1).

56 Compliant with the requirements in delegated acts for hydrogen from renewable sources: Commission delegated regulation of 10 February 2023 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a Union methodology setting out detailed rules for the production of renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non- biological origin; and Commission delegated regulation of 10 February 2023 supplementing Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council by establishing a minimum threshold for greenhouse gas emissions savings of recycled carbon fuels and by specifying a methodology for assessing greenhouse gas emissions savings from renewable liquid and gaseous transport fuels of non-biological origin and from recycled carbon fuel.

57 Based on Directive (EU) 2018/2001 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 December 2018 on the promotion of the use of energy from renewable sources.

AR 33. The information required under paragraph 37 (a) is applicable if the undertaking is operating in at least one high climate impact sector. The information required under paragraph 38 (a) to (e). shall also include energy from fossil sources consumed in operations that are not in high climate impact sectors.

AR 34. The information on Energy consumption and mix may be presented using the following tabular format for high climate impact sectors and for all other sector by omitting rows (1) to (5). 

Energy consumption and mix

Comparative

Year N

(1) Fuel consumption from coal and coal products (MWh)

 

 

(2) Fuel consumption from crude oil and petroleum products (MWh)

 

 

(3) Fuel consumption from natural gas (MWh)

 

 

(4) Fuel consumption from other fossil sources (MWh)

 

 

(5) Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from fossil sources (MWh)

 

 

(6) Total fossil energy consumption (MWh) (calculated as the sum of lines 1 to 5)

 

 

Share of fossil sources in total energy consumption (%)

 

 

(7) Consumption from nuclear sources (MWh)

 

 

Share of consumption from nuclear sources in total energy consumption (%)

 

 

(8) Fuel consumption for renewable sources, including biomass (also comprising industrial and municipal waste of biologic origin, biogas, renewable hydrogen, etc.) (MWh)

 

 

(9) Consumption of purchased or acquired electricity, heat, steam, and cooling from renewable sources (MWh)

 

 

(10) The consumption of self-generated non-fuel renewable energy (MWh)

 

 

(11) Total renewable energy consumption (MWh) (calculated as the sum of lines 8 to 10)

 

 

Share of renewable sources in total energy consumption (%)

 

 

Total energy consumption (MWh) (calculated as the sum of lines 6, and 11)

 

 

AR 35. The total energy consumption with a distinction between fossil, nuclear and renewable energy consumption may be presented graphically in the sustainability statement showing developments over time (e.g., through a pie or bar chart).

Energy intensity based on net revenue

Calculation guidance

AR 36. When preparing the information on energy intensity required under paragraph 40, the undertaking shall:

  1. calculate the energy intensity ratio using the following formula:

    𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝑒𝑛𝑒𝑟𝑔𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑛𝑠𝑢𝑚𝑝𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠 (𝑀𝑊ℎ)
                                                                                                                                                                  ;

    𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒 𝑓𝑟𝑜𝑚 𝑎𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑡𝑖𝑒𝑠 𝑖𝑛 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ 𝑐𝑙𝑖𝑚𝑎𝑡𝑒 𝑖𝑚𝑝𝑎𝑐𝑡 𝑠𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑜𝑟𝑠 (𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡)

  2. express the total energy consumption in MWh and the net revenue in monetary units (e.g., Euros);
  3. the numerator and denominator shall only consist of the proportion of the total final energy consumption (in the numerator) and net revenue (in the denominator) that are attributable to activities in high climate impact sectors. In effect, there should be consistency in the scope of both the numerator and denominator;
  4. calculate the total energy consumption in line with the requirement in paragraph 37;
  5. calculate the net revenue in line with the accounting standards requirements applicable for the financial statements, i.e., IFRS 15 Revenue from Contracts with Customers or local GAAP requirements.

AR 37. The quantitative information may be presented in the following table.

Energy intensity per net revenue

 

Comparative

 

N

 

% N / N-1

Total energy consumption from activities in high climate impact sectors per net revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors (MWh/Monetary unit)

 

 

 

 

 

 

Connectivity of energy intensity based on net revenue with financial reporting information

AR 38. The reconciliation of net revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors to the relevant financial statements line item or disclosure (as required by paragraph 43) may be presented either:

  1. by a cross-reference to the related line item or disclosure in the financial statements; or
  2. If the net revenue cannot be directly cross-referenced to a line item or disclosure in the financial statements, by a quantitative reconciliation using the below tabular format.

Net revenue from activities in high climate impact sectors used to calculate energy intensity

 

Net revenue (other)

 

Total net revenue (Financial statements)

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None None
21 E1 - Climate change Metrics and targets E1-6 - Gross Scopes 1, 2, 3 and Total GHG emissions
  1. The undertaking shall disclose in metric tonnes of CO2eq its[1]:
    1. gross Scope 1 GHG emissions;
    2. gross Scope 2 GHG emissions;
    3. gross Scope 3 GHG emissions; and
    4. total GHG emissions.

  2. The objective of the Disclosure Requirement in paragraph 44 in respect of:
    1. gross Scope 1 GHG emissions as required by paragraph 44 (a) is to provide an understanding of the direct impacts of the undertaking on climate change and the proportion of its total GHG emissions that are regulated under emission trading schemes.
    2. gross Scope 2 GHG emissions as required by paragraph 44 (b) is to provide an understanding of the indirect impacts on climate change caused by the undertaking’s consumed energy whether externally purchased or acquired.
    3. gross Scope 3 GHG emissions as required by paragraph 44 (c) is to provide an understanding of the GHG emissions that occur in the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain beyond its Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions. For many undertakings, Scope 3 GHG emissions may be the main component of their GHG inventory and are an important driver of the undertaking’s transition risks.
    4. total GHG emissions as required by paragraph 44 (d) is to provide an overall understanding of the undertaking’s GHG emissions and whether they occur from its own operations or the usptream and donwstream value chain. This disclosure is a prerequisite for measuring progress towards reducing GHG emissions in accordance with the undertaking’s climate-related targets and EU policy

The information from this Disclosure Requirement is also needed to understand the undertaking’s climate-related transition risks.

  1. When disclosing the information on GHG emissions required under paragraph 44, the undertaking shall refer to ESRS 1 paragraphs from 62 to 67. In principle, the data on GHG emissions of its associates or joint ventures that are part of the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain (ESRS 1 Paragraph 67) are not limited to the share of equity held. For its associates, joint ventures, unconsolidated subsidiaries (investment entities) and contractual arrangements that are joint arrangements not structured through an entity (i.e., jointly controlled operations and assets), the undertaking shall include the GHG emissions in accordance with the extent of the undertaking’s operational control over them.  

  2. In case of significant changes in the definition of what constitutes the reporting undertaking and its upstream and downstream value chain, the undertaking shall disclose these changes and explain their effect on the year-to-year comparability of its reported GHG emissions (i.e., the effect on the comparability of current versus previous reporting period GHG emissions).

  3. The disclosure on gross Scope 1 GHG emissions required by paragraph 44 (a) shall include:
    1. the gross Scope 1 GHG emissions in metric tonnes of CO2eq; and
    2. the percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes.

  4. The disclosure on gross Scope 2 GHG emissions required by paragraph 44 (b) shall include: (a) the gross location-based Scope 2 GHG emissions in metric tonnes of CO2eq; and (b) the gross market-based Scope 2 GHG emissions in metric tonnes of CO2eq.

  5. For Scope 1 and Scope 2 emissions disclosed as required by paragraphs 44 (a) and (b) the undertaking shall disaggregate the information, separately disclosing emissions from:
    1. the consolidated accounting group (the parent and subsidiaries); and
    2. investees such as associates, joint ventures, or unconsolidated subsidiaries that are not fully consolidated in the financial statements of the consolidated accounting group, as well as contractual arrangements that are joint arrangements not structured through an entity (i.e., jointly controlled operations and assets), for which it has operational control.

  6. The disclosure of gross Scope 3 GHG emissions required by paragraph 44 (c) shall include GHG emissions in metric tonnes of CO2eq from each significant Scope 3 category (i.e. each Scope 3 category that is a priority for the undertaking).

  7. The disclosure of total GHG emissions required by paragraph 44 (d) shall be the sum of Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions required by paragraphs 44 (a) to (c). The total GHG emissions shall be disclosed with a disaggregation that makes a distinction of:
    1. the total GHG emissions derived from the underlying Scope 2 GHG emissions being measured using the location-based method; and
    2. the total GHG emissions derived from the underlying Scope 2 GHG emissions being measured using the market-based method.
GHG Intensity based on net revenue[2]
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its GHG emissions intensity (total GHG emissions per net revenue).

  2. The disclosure on GHG intensity required by paragraph 53 shall provide the total GHG emissions in metric tonnes of CO2eq (required by paragraph 44 (d)) per net revenue.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose the reconciliation to the relevant line item or notes in the financial statements of the net revenue amounts (the denominator in the calculation of the GHG emissions intensity required by paragraph 53).

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicators #1 and #2 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“GHG emissions” and “Carbon footprint”). This information is aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation), Articles 5 (1), 6 and 8 (1).

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #3 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“GHG intensity of investee companies”). This information is aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation), Article 8 (1).

 

Application Requirements

Calculation guidance

AR 39. When preparing the information for reporting GHG emissions as required by paragraph 44, the undertaking shall:

  1. consider the principles, requirements and guidance provided by the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (version 2004). The undertaking may consider Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/227958 or the requirements stipulated by EN ISO 14064- 1:2018. If the undertaking already applies the GHG accounting methodology of ISO 14064- 1: 2018, it shall nevertheless comply with the requirements of this standard (e.g., regarding reporting boundaries and the disclosure of market-based Scope 2 GHG emissions);
  2. disclose the methodologies, significant assumptions and emissions factors used to calculate or measure GHG emissions accompanied by the reasons why they were chosen, and provide a reference or link to any calculation tools used;
  3. include emissions of CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, and NF3. Additional GHG may be considered when significant; and
  4. use the most recent Global Warming Potential (GWP) values published by the IPCC based on a 100-year time horizon to calculate CO2eq emissions of non-CO2 gases.

AR 40. When preparing the information for reporting GHG emissions from its associates, joint ventures, unconsolidated subsidiaries (investment entities) and contractual arrangements as required by paragraph 50, the undertaking shall consolidate 100% of the GHG emissions of the entities it operationally controls. In practice, this happens when the undertakings holds the license - or permit - to operate the assets from these associates, joint ventures, unconsolidated subsidiaries (investment entities) and contractual arrangements. When the undertaking has a contractually defined part-time operational control, it shall consolidate 100% the GHG emitted during the time of its operational control.

AR 41. In line with ESRS 1 chapter 3.7, the undertaking shall disaggregate information on its GHG emissions as appropriate. For example, the undertaking may disaggregate its Scope 1, 2, 3, or total GHG emissions by country, operating segments, economic activity, subsidiary, GHG category (CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, NF3, and other GHG considered by the undertaking) or source type (stationary combustion, mobile combustion, process emissions and fugitive emissions).

AR 42. An undertaking might have a different reporting period from some or all of the entities in its value chain. In such circumstances, the undertaking is permitted to measure its GHG emissions in accordance with paragraph 44 using information for reporting periods that are different from its own reporting period if that information is obtained from entities in its value chain with reporting periods that are different from the undertaking’s reporting period, on the condition that:

  1. the undertaking uses the most recent data available from those entities in its value chain to measure and disclose its greenhouse gas emissions;
  2. the length of the reporting periods is the same; and
  3. the undertaking discloses the effects of significant events and changes in circumstances (relevant to its GHG emissions) that occur between the reporting dates of the entities in its value chain and the date of the undertaking’s general purpose financial statements.

AR 43. When preparing the information on gross Scope 1 GHG emissions required under paragraph 48 (a), the undertaking shall:

  1. calculate or measure GHG emissions from stationary combustion, mobile combustion, process emissions and fugitive emissions; and use suitable activity data that include the non-renewable fuel consumption;
  2. use suitable and consistent emission factors;
  3. disclose biogenic emissions of CO2 from the combustion or bio-degradation of biomass separately from the Scope 1 GHG emissions, but include emissions of other types of GHG (in particular CH4 and N2O);
  4. not include any removals, or any purchased, sold or transferred carbon credits or GHG allowances in the calculation of Scope 1 GHG emissions; and
  5. for activities reporting under the EU ETS, report on Scope 1 emissions following the EU ETS methodology. The EU ETS methodology may also be applied to activities in geographies and sectors that are not covered by the EU ETS.

AR 44. When preparing the information on the percentage of Scope 1 GHG emissions from regulated emission trading schemes required under paragraph 48 (b), the undertaking shall:

  1. consider GHG emissions from the installations it operates that are subject to regulated Emission Trading Schemes (ETS), including the EU-ETS, national ETS and non-EU ETS, if applicable;
  2. only include emissions of CO2, CH4, N2O, HFCs, PFCs, SF6, and NF3;
  3. ensure the same accounting period for gross Scope 1 GHG emissions and GHG emissions regulated under the ETS; and
  4. calculate the share by using the following formula:

GHG Emissions in (t CO2eq) from EU ETS installations + national ETS installations + nonEU ETS installations Scope 1 GHG emissions (t CO2eq)

AR 45. When preparing the information on gross Scope 2 GHG emissions required under paragraph 49, the undertaking shall:

  1. consider the principles and requirements of the GHG Protocol Scope 2 Guidance (version 2015, in particular the Scope 2 quality criteria in chapter 7.1 relating to contractual instruments); it may also consider Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 or the relevant requirements for the quantification of indirect GHG emissions from imported energy in EN ISO 14064-1:2018;
  2. include purchased or acquired electricity, steam, heat, and cooling consumed by the undertaking;
  3. avoid double counting of GHG emissions reported under Scope 1 or 3;
  4. apply the location-based and market-based methods to calculate Scope 2 GHG emissions and provide information on the share and types of contractual instruments. Location-based method quantifies Scope 2 GHG emissions based on average energy generation emission factors for defined locations, including local, subnational, or national boundaries (GHG Protocol, “Scope 2 Guidance”, Glossary, 2015). Market-based method quantifies Scope 2 GHG emissions based on GHG emissions emitted by the generators from which the reporting entity contractually purchases electricity bundled with instruments, or unbundled instruments on their own (GHG Protocol, “Scope 2 Guidance”, Glossary, 2015); in this case, the undertaking may disclose the share of market-based scope 2 GHG emissions linked to purchased electricity bundled with instruments such as Guarantee of Origins or Renewable Energy Certificates. The undertaking shall provide information about the share and types of contractual instruments used for the sale and purchase of energy bundled with attributes about the energy generation or for unbundled energy attribute claims.
  5. disclose biogenic emissions of CO2 carbon from the combustion or biodegradation of biomass separately from the Scope 2 GHG emissions but include emissions of other types of GHG (in particular CH4 and N2O). In case the emission factors applied do not separate the percentage of biomass or biogenic CO2, the undertaking shall disclose In case GHG emissions other than CO2 (particularly CH4 and N2O) are not available for, or excluded from, location-based grid average emissions factors or with the market-based method information, the undertaking shall disclose this.
  6. not include any removals, or any purchased, sold or transferred carbon credits or GHG allowances in the calculation of Scope 2 GHG emissions.

AR 46. When preparing the information on gross Scope 3 GHG emissions required under paragraph 51, the undertaking shall:

  1. consider the principles and provisions of the GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (Version 2011); and it may consider Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 or the relevant requirements for the quantification of indirect GHG emissions from EN ISO 14064-1:2018;
  2. if it is a financial institution, consider the GHG Accounting and Reporting Standard for the Financial Industry from the Partnership for Carbon Accounting Financial (PCAF), specifically part A “Financed Emissions” (version December 2022);
  3. screen its total Scope 3 GHG emissions based on the 15 Scope 3 categories identified by the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard and GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (Version 2011) using appropriate estimates. Alternatively, it may screen its indirect GHG emissions based on the categories provided by EN ISO 14064-1:2018 clause 5.2.4 (excluding indirect GHG emissions from imported energy);
  4. identify and disclose its significant Scope 3 categories based on the magnitude of their estimated GHG emissions and other criteria provided by GHG Protocol Corporate Value Chain (Scope 3) Accounting and Reporting Standard (Version 2011, p. 61 and 65-68) or EN ISO 14064-1:2018 Annex H.3.2, such as financial spend, influence, related transition risks and opportunities or stakeholder views;
  5. calculate or estimate GHG emissions in significant Scope 3 categories using suitable emissions factors;
  6. update Scope 3 GHG emissions in each significant category every year on the basis of current activity data; update the full Scope 3 GHG inventory at least every 3 years or on the occurrence of a significant event or a significant change in circumstances (a significant event or significant change in circumstances can, for example, relate to changes in the undertaking’s activities or structure, changes in the activities or structure of its upstream and downstream value chain(s), a change in calculation methodology or in the discovery of errors);”);
  7. disclose the extent to which the undertaking’s Scope 3 GHG emissions are measured using inputs from specific activities within the entity’s upstream and downstream value chain, and disclose the percentage of emissions calculated using primary data obtained from suppliers or other value chain
  8. for each significant Scope 3 GHG category, disclose the reporting boundaries considered, the calculation methods for estimating the GHG emissions as well as if and which calculation tools were applied. The Scope 3 categories should be consistent with the GHGP and include:
    1. indirect Scope 3 GHG emissions from the consolidated accounting group (the parent and its subsidiaries),
    2. indirect Scope 3 GHG emissions from associates, joint ventures, and unconsolidated subsidiaries for which the undertaking has the ability to control the operational activities and relationships (i.e., operational control),
    3. Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions from associates, joint ventures, unconsolidated subsidiaries (investment entities) and joint arrangements for which the undertaking does not have operational control and when these entities are part of the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain.
  9. disclose a list of Scope 3 GHG emissions categories included in and excluded from the inventory with a justification for excluded Scope 3 categories;
  10. disclose biogenic emissions of CO2 from the combustion or biodegradation of biomass that occur in its upstream and downstream value chain separately from the gross Scope 3 GHG emissions, and include emissions of other types of GHG (such as CH4 and N2O), and emissions of CO2 that occur in the life cycle of biomass other than from combustion or biodegradation (such as GHG emissions from processing or transporting biomass) in the calculation of Scope 3 GHG emissions;
  11. not include any removals, or any purchased, sold or transferred carbon credits or GHG allowances in the calculation of Scope 3 GHG emissions;

AR 47. When preparing the information on the total GHG emissions required under paragraph 52, the undertaking shall:

  1. apply the following formulas to calculate the total GHG emissions:

    Total GHG emissions𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛−𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑 (t CO2eq)

    = Gross Scope 1 + Gross Scope 2𝑙𝑜𝑐𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑜𝑛−𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑 + Gross Scope 3 Total GHG emissions𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡−𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑 (t CO2eq)

    = Gross Scope 1 + Gross Scope 2𝑚𝑎𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑡−𝑏𝑎𝑠𝑒𝑑 + Gross Scope 3

  2. disclose total GHG emissions with a distinction between emissions derived from the location-based and market-based methods applied while measuring the underlying Scope 2 GHG emissions.
  •  

AR 48. The undertaking shall disclose its total GHG emissions disaggregated by Scopes 1 and 2 and significant Scope 3 in accordance with the table below.

 

Retrospective

Milestones and target years    

Base year

Comparative

N

% N / N-1

2025

2030

(2050)

Annual % target / Base year

Scope 1 GHG emissions

Gross Scope 1 GHG emissions (tCO2eq)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Percentage of Scope 1

GHG emissions from

regulated emission trading schemes (%)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Scope 2 GHG emissions

Gross location-based Scope 2 GHG emissions

(tCO2eq)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Gross market-based Scope

2 GHG emissions (tCO2eq)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Significant scope 3 GHG emissions

Total Gross indirect (Scope 3) GHG emissions (tCO2eq)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

1 Purchased goods and services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

[Optional sub-category: Cloud computing and data centre services

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

2 Capital goods

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

3 Fuel and energy-related Activities (not included in Scope1 or Scope 2)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

4 Upstream transportation and distribution

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

5 Waste generated in operations

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

6 Business traveling

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

7 Employee commuting

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

8 Upstream leased assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

9 Downstream transportation

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

10 Processing of sold products

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

11 Use of sold products

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

12 End-of-life treatment of sold products

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

13 Downstream leased assets

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

14 Franchises

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

15 Investments

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total GHG emissions

Total GHG emissions

(location-based) (tCO2eq)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Total GHG emissions

(market-based) (tCO2eq)

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

AR 49. To highlight potential transition risks, the undertaking may disclose its total GHG emissions disaggregated by major countries and, if applicable, by operating segments (applying the same segments for the financial statements as required by the accounting standards, i.e., IFRS 8 Operating Segments or local GAAP). Scope 3 GHG emissions may be excluded from these breakdowns by country if the related data is not readily available.

AR 50. The Scope 3 GHG emissions may also be presented by according to the indirect emission categories defined in EN ISO 14064-1:2018.

AR 51. If it is material for the undertaking's Scope 3 emissions, it shall disclose the GHG emissions from purchased cloud computing and data centre services as a subset of the overarching Scope 3 category “upstream purchased goods and services”.

AR 52. The total GHG emissions disaggregated by Scope 1, 2 and 3 GHG emissions may be graphically presented in the sustainability statement (e.g., as a bar or pie chart) showing the split of GHG emissions across the value chain (Upstream, Own operations, Transport, Downstream).

GHG intensity based on net revenue

Calculation guidance

AR 53. When disclosing the information on GHG intensity based on net revenue required under paragraph 53, the undertaking shall:

  1. calculate the GHG intensity ratio by the following formula:

    𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐺𝐻𝐺 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 (𝑡 𝐶𝑂2𝑒𝑞);

    𝑁𝑒𝑡 𝑟𝑒𝑣𝑒𝑛𝑢𝑒 (𝑀𝑜𝑛𝑒𝑡𝑎𝑟𝑦 𝑢𝑛𝑖𝑡)

  2. express the total GHG emissions in metric tonnes of CO2eq and the net revenue in monetary units (e.g., Euros) and present the results for the market-based and location-based method;
  3. include the total GHG emissions in the numerator and overall net revenue in the denominator;
  4. calculate the total GHG emissions as required by paragraphs 44 (d) and 52; and
  5. calculate the net revenue in line with the requirements in accounting standards applied for financial statements, i.e., IFRS 15 or local GAAP.

AR 54. The quantitative information may be presented in the following tabular format.

GHG intensity per net revenue

Comparative

N

% N / N-1

Total GHG emissions (location-based) per net revenue (tCO2eq/Monetary unit)

 

 

 

Total GHG emissions (market-based) per net revenue (tCO2eq/Monetary unit)

 

 

 

Connectivity of GHG intensity based on revenue with financial reporting information

AR 55. The reconciliation of the net revenue used to calculate GHG intensity to the relevant line item or notes in the financial statements (as required by paragraph 55) may be done by either:

  1. a cross-reference to the related line item or disclosure in the financial statements; or
  2. if the net revenue cannot be directly cross-referenced to a line item or disclosure in the financial statements, by a quantitative reconciliation using the below tabular format.

Net revenue used to calculate GHG intensity

 

Net revenue (other)

 

Total net revenue (in financial statements)

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None None
22 E1 - Climate change Metrics and targets E1-7 – GHG removals and GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits
  1. The undertaking shall disclose:
    1. GHG removals and storage in metric tonnes of CO2eq resulting from projects it may have developed in its own operations, or contributed to in its upstream and downstream value chain; and
    2. the amount of GHG emission reductions or removals from climate change mitigation projects outside its value chain it has financed or intends to finance through any purchase of carbon credits.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is:
    1. to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s actions to permanently remove or actively support the removal of GHG from the atmosphere, potentially for achieving net-zero targets (as stated in paragraph 60).
    2. to provide an understanding of the extent and quality of carbon credits the undertaking has purchased or intends to purchase from the voluntary market, potentially for supporting its GHG neutrality claims (as stated in paragraph 61).

  3. The disclosure on GHG removals and storage required by paragraph 56 (a) shall include, if applicable:
    1. the total amount of GHG removals and storage in metric tonnes of CO2eq disaggregated and separately disclosed for the amount related to the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and donwstream value chain, and broken down by removal activity; and
    2. the calculation assumptions, methodologies and frameworks applied by the undertaking.

  4. The disclosure on carbon credits required by paragraph 56 (b) shall include, if applicable:
    1. the total amount of carbon credits outside the undertaking’s value chain in metric tonnes of CO2eq that are verified against recognised quality standards and cancelled in the reporting period; and
    2. the total amount of carbon credits outside the undertaking’s value chain in metric tonnes of CO2eq planned to be cancelled in the future and whether they are based on existing contractual agreements or not.
  1. In the case where the undertaking discloses a net-zero target in addition to the gross GHG emission reduction targets in accordance with Disclosure Requirement E1-4, paragraph 30, it shall explain the scope, methodologies and frameworks applied and how the residual GHG emissions (after approximately 90-95% of GHG emission reduction with the possibility for justified sectoral variations in line with a recognised sectoral decarbonisation pathway) are intended to be neutralised by, for example, GHG removals in its own operations and upstream and donwstream value chain.

  2. In the case where the undertaking may have made public claims of GHG neutrality that involve the use of carbon credits, it shall explain:
    1. whether and how these claims are accompanied by GHG emission reduction targets as required by Disclosure requirement ESRS E1-4;
    2. whether and how these claims and the reliance on carbon credits neither impede nor reduce the achievement of its GHG emission reduction targets[1], or, if applicable, its net zero target; and
    3. the credibility and integrity of the carbon credits used, including by reference to recognised quality standards.

[1] This information is aligned with Regulation (EU) 2021/1119 of the European Parliament and of the Council (EU Climate Law), Article 2 (1).

 

Application Requirements

GHG removals and storage in own operations and the upstream and downstream value chain

AR 56. In addition to their GHG emission inventories, undertakings shall provide transparency on how and to what extent they either enhance natural sinks or apply technical solutions to remove GHGs from the atmosphere in their own operations and upstream and downstream value chain. While there are no generally accepted concepts and methodologies for accounting for GHG removals, this Standard aims to increase transparency on the undertaking’s efforts to remove GHGs from the atmosphere (paragraphs 56 (a) and 58). The GHG removals outside the value chain that the undertaking supports through the purchase of carbon credits are to be disclosed separately as required by paragraphs 56 (b) and 59.

AR 57. When disclosing the information on GHG removals and storage from the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and donwstream value chain required under paragraphs 56 (a) and 58, for each removal and storage activity, the undertaking shall describe:

  1. the GHGs concerned;
  2. whether removal and storage are biogenic or from land-use change (e.g., afforestation, reforestation, forest restoration, urban tree planting, agroforestry, building soil carbon, etc.), technological (e.g., direct air capture), or hybrid (e.g., bioenergy with CO2 capture and storage), and technological details about the removal, the type of storage and, if applicable, the transport of removed GHGs;
  3. if applicable, a brief explanation of whether the activity qualifies as a nature-based solution; and
  4. how the risk of non-permanence is managed, including determining and monitoring leakage and reversal events, as appropriate.

Calculation guidance

AR 58. When preparing the information on GHG removals and storage from the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and donwstream value chain required under paragraphs 56 (a) and 58, the undertaking shall:

  1. consider, as far as applicable, the GHG Protocol Corporate Standard (version 2004), Product Standard (version 2011), Agriculture Guidance (version 2014), Land use, land-use change, and forestry Guidance for GHG project accounting (version 2006);
  2. apply consensus methods on accounting for GHG removals as soon as they are available, notably the EU regulatory framework for the certification of CO2 removals;
  3. if applicable, explain the role of removals for its climate change mitigation policy;
  4. include removals from operations that it owns, controls, or contributes to and that have not been sold to another party through carbon credits;
  5. if applicable, mark those GHG removal activities in own operations or the value chain that have been converted into carbon credits and sold on to other parties on the voluntary market;
  6. account for the GHG emissions associated with a removal activity, including transport and storage, under Disclosure Requirement E1-6 (Scopes 1, 2 or 3). To increase transparency on the efficiency of a removal activity, including transport and storage, the undertaking may disclose the GHG emissions associated with this activity (e.g., GHG emissions from electricity consumption of direct air capture technologies) alongside, but separately from, the amount of removed GHG emissions;
  7. in case of a reversal, account for the respective GHG emissions as an offset for the removals in the reporting period;
  8. use the most recent GWP values published by the IPCC based on a 100-year time horizon to calculate CO2eq emissions of non-CO2 gases and describe the assumptions made, methodologies and frameworks applied for calculation of the amount of GHG removals; and
  9. consider nature-based solutions.

AR 59. The undertaking shall disaggregate and separately disclose the GHG removals that occur in its own operations and those that occur in its upstream and downstream value chain. GHG removal activities in the upstream and downstream value chain shall include those that the undertaking is actively supporting, for example, through a cooperation project with a supplier. The undertaking is not expected to include any GHG removals that may occur in its upstream and downstream value chain that it is not aware of.

AR 60. The quantitative information on GHG removals may be presented by using the following tabular format.

Removals

Comparative

N

% N / N-1

GHG removal activity 1 (e.g.., forest restoration)

-

 

 

GHG removal activity 2 (e.g.., direct air capture)

-

 

 

-

 

 

Total GHG removals from own operations (tCO2eq)

 

 

 

GHG removal activity 1 (e.g.., forest restoration)

-

 

 

GHG removal activity 2 (e.g.., direct air capture)

-

 

 

-

 

 

Total GHG removals in the upstream and downstream value chain (tCO2eq)

 

 

 

Reversals (tCO2eq)

 

 

 

GHG mitigation projects financed through carbon credits

AR 61. Financing GHG emission reduction projects outside the undertaking’s value chain through purchasing carbon credits that fulfil high-quality standards can be a useful contribution towards mitigating climate change. This Standard requires the undertaking to disclose whether it uses carbon credits separately from the GHG emissions (paragraphs 56 (b) and 59) and GHG emission reduction targets (Disclosure Requirement E1-4). It also requires the undertaking to show the extent of use and which quality criteria it uses for those carbon credits.

AR 62. When disclosing the information on carbon credits required under paragraphs 56 (b) and 59, the undertaking shall disclose the following disaggregation as applicable:

  1. the share (percentage of volume) of reduction projects and removal projects;
  2. for carbon credits from removal projects, an explanation whether they are from biogenic or technological sinks;
  3. the share (percentage of volume) for each recognised quality standard;
  4. the share (percentage of volume) issued from projects in the EU; and
  5. the share (percentage of volume) that qualifies as a corresponding adjustment under Article. 6 of the Paris Agreement.

Calculation guidance

AR 63. When preparing the information on carbon credits required under paragraphs 56 (b) and 59, the undertaking shall:

  1. Consider recognised quality standards;.
  2. if applicable, explain the role of carbon credits in its climate change mitigation policy;
  3. not include carbon credits issued from GHG emission reduction projects within its value chain as the respective GHG emission reductions shall already be disclosed under Disclosure Requirement E1-6 (Scope 2 or Scope 3) at the time they occur (i.e., double counting is avoided);
  4. not include carbon credits from GHG removal projects within its value chain as the respective GHG removals may already be accounted for under Disclosure Requirement E1-7 at the time they occur (i.e., double counting is avoided);
  5. not disclose carbon credits as an offset for its GHG emissions under Disclosure Requirement E1-6 on GHG emissions;
  6. not disclose carbon credits as a means to reach the GHG emission reduction targets disclosed under Disclosure Requirement E1-4; and
  7. calculate the amount of carbon credits to be cancelled in the future, as the sum of carbon credits in metric tonnes of CO2eq over the duration of existing contractual agreements.

AR 64. The information on carbon credits cancelled in the reporting year and planned to be cancelled in the future may be presented using the following tabular formats.

Carbon credits cancelled in the reporting year

Comparative

N

Total (tCO2eq)

 

 

Share from removal projects (%)

 

 

Share from reduction projects (%)

 

 

Recognised quality standard 1 (%)

 

 

Recognised quality standard 2 (%)

 

 

Recognised quality standard 3 (%)

 

 

 

 

Share from projects within the EU (%)

 

 

Share of carbon credits that qualify as corresponding adjustments (%)

 

 

 

Carbon credits planned to be cancelled in the future

Amount until [period]

Total (tCO2eq)

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None None
23 E1 - Climate change Metrics and targets E1-8 – Internal carbon pricing
  1. The undertaking shall disclose whether it applies internal carbon pricing schemes, and if so, how they support its decision making and incentivise the implementation of climate-related policies and targets.

  2. The information required in paragraph 62 shall include:
    1. the type of internal carbon pricing scheme, for example, the shadow prices applied for CapEX or research and development (R&D) investment decision making, internal carbon fees or internal carbon funds;
    2. the specific scope of application of the carbon pricing schemes (activities, geographies, entities, etc.);
    3. the carbon prices applied according to the type of scheme and critical assumptions made to determine the prices, including the source of the applied carbon prices and why these are deemed relevant for their chosen application. The undertaking may disclose the calculation methodology of the carbon prices including the extent to which these have been set using scientific guidance and how their future development is related to science-based carbon pricing trajectories; and
    4. the current year approximate gross GHG emission volumes by Scopes 1, 2 and, where applicable, Scope 3 in metric tonnes of CO2eq covered by these schemes, as well as their share of the undertaking’s overall GHG emissions for each respective Scope.

 

Application Requirements

AR 65. When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 62 and 63, if applicable, the undertaking shall briefly explain whether and how the carbon prices used in internal carbon pricing schemes are consistent with those used in financial statements. This shall be done in respect of the internal carbon prices used for,

  1. the assessment of the useful life and residual value of its assets (intangibles, property, plant and equipment);
  2. the impairment of assets; and
  3. the fair value measurement of assets acquired through business

AR 66. The information may be presented by using the following table:

Types of internal carbon prices

Volume at stake (tCO2eq)

Prices applied (€/tCO2eq)

Perimeter description

CapEx shadow price

 

 

 

Research and Development (R&D) investment shadow price

 

 

 

Internal carbon fee or fund

 

 

 

Carbon prices for impairment testing

 

 

 

Etc.

 

 

 

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None None
24 E1 - Climate change Metrics and targets E1-9 – Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks and potential climate-related opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its:
    1. anticipated financial effects from material physical risks;
    2. anticipated financial effects from material transition risks; and
    3. potential to benefit from material climate-related opportunities.
  1. The information required by paragraph 64 is in addition to the information on current financial effects required under ESRS 2 SBM-3 para 48 (d). The objective of this Disclosure Requirement related to:
    1. anticipated financial effects due to material physical risks and transition risks is to provide an understanding of how these risks have (or could reasonably be expected to have) a material influence on the undertaking’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows, over the short-, medium- and long- term. The results of scenario analysis used to conduct resilience analysis as required under paragraphs AR 10 to AR 13 should inform the assessment of anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks.
    2. potential to pursue material climate-related opportunities is to enable an understanding of how the undertaking may financially benefit from material climate- related opportunities. This disclosure is complementary to the key performance indicators to be disclosed in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178.

  2. The disclosure of anticipated financial effects from material physical risks required by paragraph 64 (a) shall include[1]:
    1. the monetary amount and proportion (percentage) of assets at material physical risk over the short-, medium- and long-term before considering climate change adaptation actions; with the monetary amounts of these assets disaggregated by acute and chronic physical risk49;
    2. the proportion of assets at material physical risk addressed by the climate change adaptation actions;
    3. the location of significant assets at material physical risk[2]; and
    4. the monetary amount and proportion (percentage) of net revenue from its business activities at material physical risk over the short-, medium- and long-term.
  1. The disclosure of anticipated financial effects from material transition risks required by paragraph 64 (b) shall include:
    1. the monetary amount and proportion (percentage) of assets at material transition risk over the short-, medium- and long-term before considering climate mitigation actions;
    2. the proportion of assets at material transition risk addressed by the climate change mitigation actions;
    3. a breakdown of the carrying value of the undertaking’s real estate assets by energy efficiency classes[3];
    4. liabilities that may have to be recognised in financial statements over the short-, medium- and long-term; and
    5. the monetary amount and proportion (percentage) of net revenue from its business activities at material transition risk over the short-, medium- and long-term including, where relevant, the net revenue from the undertaking’s customers operating in coal, oil and gas-related activities.
  1. The undertaking shall disclose reconciliations to the relevant line items or notes in the financial statements of the following:
    1. significant amounts of the assets and net revenue at material physical risk (as required by paragraph 66);
    2. significant amounts of the assets, liabilities, and net revenue at material transition risk (as required by paragraph 67).

  2. For the disclosure of the potential to pursue climate-related opportunities required by paragraph 64 (c) the undertaking shall consider[4]:
    1. its expected cost savings from climate change mitigation and adaptation actions; and
    2. the potential market size or expected changes to net revenue from low-carbon products and services or adaptation solutions to which the undertaking has or may have access.

  3. A quantification of the financial effects that arise from opportunities is not required if such a disclosure does not meet the qualitative characteristics of useful information included under ESRS 1 Appendix B Qualitative characteristics of information.

 

[1] This information is aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation). 49 This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements included in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - Template 5: Banking book - Climate change physical risk: Exposures subject to physical risk.

[2] This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements included in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - Template 5: Banking book - Climate change physical risk: Exposures subject to physical risk.

[3] This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements included in Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453- Template 2: Banking book - Climate change transition risk: Loans collateralised by immovable property - Energy efficiency of the collateral.

[4] This information is aligned with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2020/1818 (Climate Benchmark Regulation).

 

Application Requirements

Anticipated financial effects from material physical and transition risks

AR 67. Material climate-related physical risks and transition risks may affect the undertaking’s financial position (e.g., owned assets, financially-controlled leased assets, and liabilities), performance (e.g., potential future increase/decrease in net revenue and costs due to business interruptions, increased supply prices resulting in potential margin erosions), and cash flows. The low probability, high severity and long-term time horizons of some climate- related physical risk exposures and the uncertainty arising from the transition to a sustainable economy mean that there will be associated material anticipated financial effects that are outside the scope of the requirements of applicable accounting standards.

AR 68. Currently, there is no commonly accepted methodology to assess or measure how material physical risks and transition risks may affect the undertaking’s future financial position, financial, performance and cash flows. Therefore, the disclosure of the financial effects (as required by paragraphs 64, 66 and 67) will depend on the undertaking’s internal methodology and the exercise of significant judgement in determining the inputs, and assumptions needed to quantify their anticipated financial effects. 

Calculation guidance - Anticipated financial effects from material physical risks

AR 69. When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 64 (a) and 66, the undertaking shall explain whether and how:

  1. it assessed the anticipated financial effects for assets and business activities at material physical risk, including the scope of application, time horizons, calculation methodology, critical assumptions and parameters and limitations of the assessment; and
  2. the assessment of assets and business activities considered to be at material physical risk relies on or is part of the process to determine material physical risk as required under paragraphs 20 (b) and AR 11 and to determine climate scenarios as required under paragraphs 19 and AR 13 to AR 14. In particular, it shall explain how it has defined medium- and long-term time horizons and how these definitions are linked to the expected lifetime of the undertaking’s assets, strategic planning horizons and capital allocation plans.

AR 70. When preparing the information on assets at material physical risk that is required to be disclosed under paragraph 66 (a), the undertaking shall:

  1. Calculate the assets at material physical risk in terms of monetary amount and as a proportion (percentage) of total assets at the reporting date (i.e., the proportion is an estimate of the carrying value of assets at material physical risk divided by total carrying value as stated in the statement of financial position or balance sheet). The estimate of assets at material physical risk shall be derived starting from the assets recognised in the financial statements. The estimate of monetary amounts and proportion of assets at physical risk may be presented as either a single amount or
  2. All types of assets including finance-lease / right-of-use assets shall be considered when determining the assets at material physical risk.
  3. To contextualise this information, the undertaking shall:
    1. disclose the location of its significant assets at material physical risk. Significant assets located (59) in the EU territory shall be aggregated by NUTS codes 3 level digits (Nomenclature of Territorial Units for Statistics). For significant assets located outside EU territory, the breakdown by NUTS code will only be provided where applicable.
    2. disaggregate the monetary amounts of assets at risk by acute and chronic physical risk (60).
  4. calculate the share of assets at material physical risk resulting from paragraph 66 (a) that is addressed by the climate change adaptation actions based on the information disclosed under Disclosure Requirement E1-3. This aims at approximating net risks.

59 This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - Template 5 exposures subjects to physical risk.
60 This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - Template 5 exposures subjects to physical risk.

AR 71. When preparing the information required under paragraph 64 (a) and 66 (d), the undertaking may assess and disclose the share of net revenue from business activities at physical risk. This disclosure

  1. shall be based on the net revenue in line with the requirements in accounting standards applied for financial statements, i.e., IFRS 15 or local GAAP.
  2. may include a breakdown of the undertaking’s business activities with the corresponding details of the associated percentage of total net revenue, the risk factors (hazards, exposure and sensitivity) and, if possible, the magnitude of the anticipated financial effects in terms of margin erosion over the short-, medium- and long-term time horizons. The nature of business activities may also be disaggregated by operating segments if the undertaking has disclosed the contribution of margins by operational segments in its segment reporting in the financial statements.

Calculation guidance - Anticipated financial effects from transition risk

AR 72. When disclosing the information required under paragraphs 64 (b) and 67 (a), the undertaking shall explain whether and how:

  1. it has assessed the potential effects on future financial performance and position for assets and business activities at material transition risk, including the scope of application, calculation methodology, critical assumptions and parameters, and limitations of the assessment; and
  2. the assessment of assets and business activities considered to be at material transition risk relies on or is part of the process to determine material transition risks as described under paragraphs 20 (c) and AR 11 and to determine scenarios as required under paragraphs AR 12 to AR 13. In particular, it shall explain how it has defined medium- and long-term time horizons and how these definitions are linked to the expected lifetime of the undertaking’s assets, strategic planning horizons and capital allocation plans.

AR 73. When disclosing the information on assets at material transition risk as required under paragraphs 67 (a) and (b):

  1. the undertaking shall at the very least include an estimate of the amount of potentially stranded assets (in monetary amounts and as a proportion/percentage) from the reporting year until 2030 and from 2030 to 2050. Stranded assets are understood as the active or firmly planned key assets of the undertaking with significant locked-in GHG emissions over their operating Firmly planned key assets are those that the undertaking will most likely deploy within the next 5 years. The amount may be expressed as a range of asset values based on different climate and policy scenarios, including a scenario aligned with limiting climate change to 1.5°C.
  2. the undertaking shall disclose a breakdown of the carrying value of its real estate assets, including rights-of-use assets, by energy efficiency classes. The energy efficiency shall be represented in terms of either the ranges of energy consumption in kWh/m² or the EPC (61) (Energy Performance Certificate) (62) label class. If the undertaking cannot obtain this information on a best-effort basis, it shall disclose the total carrying amount of the real estate assets for which the energy consumption is based on internal
  3. the undertaking shall calculate the proportion (percentage) of total assets (including finance lease/right-of-use assets) at material transition risk addressed by the climate change mitigation actions based on the information disclosed under Disclosure Requirement E1-3. The total assets amount is the carrying amount on the balance sheet at the reporting date.

61 Directive 2010/31/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 May 2010 on the energy performance of buildings (OJ L 153, 18.6.2010, p. 13).
62 This disclosure requirement is consistent with the requirements of Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2022/2453 - Template 2 immovable property, energy efficiency of the collateral.

AR 74. When disclosing the information on potential liabilities from material transition risks required under paragraph 67(d):

  1. undertakings that operate installations regulated under an emission trading scheme may include a range of potential future liabilities originating from these schemes;
  2. undertakings subject to the EU ETS, may disclose the potential future liabilities that relate to their allocation plans for the period before and until 2030. The potential liability may be estimated on the basis of:
    1. the number of allowances held by the undertaking at the beginning of the reporting period;
    2. the number of allowances to be purchased in the market yearly, i.e., before and until 2030;
    3. the gap between estimated future emissions under various transition scenarios and free allocations of allowances that are known for the period until 2030, and
    4. the estimated yearly cost per tonne of CO2 for which an allowance needs to be purchased;
  3. In assessing its potential future liabilities, the undertaking may consider and disclose the number of Scope 1 GHG emission allowances within regulated emission trading schemes and the cumulative number of emission allowances stored (from previous allowances) at the beginning of the reporting period;
  4. undertakings disclosing volumes of carbon credits planned to be cancelled in the near future (Disclosure Requirement E1-7) may disclose the potential future liabilities associated with those based on existing contractual agreements;
  5. the undertaking may also include its monetised gross Scope 1, 2 and total GHG emissions (in monetary units) calculated as follows:
    1. monetised Scope 1 and 2 GHG emissions in the reporting year by the following formula:
      1. (𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑝𝑒 1 𝐺𝐻𝐺 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 (𝑡 𝐶𝑂2𝑒𝑞+ 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 𝑆𝑐𝑜𝑝𝑒 2 𝐺𝐻𝐺 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 (𝑡 𝐶𝑂2𝑒𝑞)) × 𝐺𝐻𝐺 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 cost rate (€ / 𝑡 𝐶𝑂2𝑒𝑞)
    2. monetized total GHG emissions in the reporting year by the following formula:
      (b) 𝑇𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 𝐺𝐻𝐺 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛𝑠 (𝑡 𝐶𝑂2𝑒𝑞× 𝐺𝐻𝐺 𝑒𝑚𝑖𝑠𝑠𝑖𝑜𝑛 𝑐𝑜𝑠𝑡 𝑟𝑎𝑡𝑒 (€ / 𝑡 𝐶𝑂2𝑒𝑞)
    3. by use of a lower, middle and upper cost rate (63) for GHG emissions (e.g., market carbon price and different estimates for the societal costs of carbon) and reasons for selecting them.

63 The cost rate is the factor used to convert non-monetary impacts like tonnes, hectares, m3 etc. into monetary units. Cost rates should be based on monetary valuation studies, need to be science-based and the methods used to obtain them transparent. Guidance on these methods can be obtained, e.g., from the EU-LIFE-funded TRANSPARENT project.

AR 75. Other approaches and methodologies may be applied to assess how transition risks may affect the future financial position of the undertaking. In any case, the disclosure of anticipated financial effects shall include a description of the methodologies and definitions used by the undertaking.

AR 76. When preparing the information required under paragraph 67 (e), the undertaking may assess and disclose the share of net revenue from business activities at transition risks. This disclosure:

  1. shall be based on the net revenue in line with the requirements in accounting standards applied for financial statements, i.e., IFRS 15 or local GAAP.
  2. may include a breakdown of the undertaking’s business activities with the corresponding details of the associated percentage of current net revenue, risk factors (events and exposure), and when possible, the anticipated financial effects related to margin erosion over the short-, medium- and long-term. The nature of business activities may also be disaggregated by operating segments if the undertaking has disclosed the contribution of margins by operational segments in its segment reporting in the financial statements.

Connectivity with financial reporting information

AR 77. The reconciliation of the significant amount of assets, liabilities, and net revenue (vulnerable to either material physical risks or transition risks) to the relevant line item or disclosure (e.g., in segment reporting) in the financial statements (as required by paragraph 68) may be presented by the undertaking as follows:

  1. as a cross-reference to the related line item or disclosure in the financial statements if these amounts are identifiable in the financial statements; or
  2. If these cannot be directly cross-referenced, as a quantitative reconciliation of each to the relevant line item or disclosure in the financial statement using the below tabular format:

Carrying amount of assets or liabilities or net revenue vulnerable to either material physical or transition risks

 

Adjusting items

 

Assets or liabilities or net revenue in the financial statements

 

AR 78. The undertaking shall ensure the consistency of data and assumptions to assess and report the anticipated financial effects from material physical risks and transition risks in the sustainability statement with the corresponding data and assumptions used for the financial statements (e.g., carbon prices used for assessing impairment of assets, the useful life of assets, estimates and provisions). The undertaking shall explain the reasons for any inconsistencies (e.g., if the full financial implications of climate-related risks are still under assessment or are not deemed material in the financial statements).

AR 79. For potential future effects on liabilities (as required by paragraph 67 (d)), if applicable, the undertaking shall cross-reference the description of the emission trading schemes in the financial statements.

Climate-related opportunities

AR 80. When disclosing the information under paragraph 69 (a), the undertaking shall explain the nature of the cost savings (e.g., from reduced energy consumption), the time horizons and the methodology used, including the scope of the assessment, critical assumptions, and limitations, and whether and how scenario analysis was applied.

AR 81. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 69 (b), the undertaking shall explain how it has assessed the market size or any expected changes to net revenue from low-carbon products and services or adaptation solutions including the scope of the assessment, the time horizon, critical assumptions, and limitations and to what extent this market is accessible to the undertaking. The information on the market size may be put in perspective to the current taxonomy-aligned revenue disclosed under the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. The entity may also explain how it will pursue its climate-related opportunities and, where possible, this should be linked to the disclosures on policies, targets and actions under Disclosure Requirements E1-2, E1-3 and E1-4.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E1.pdf None None None
25 E2 - Pollution Impact, risk and opportunity management E2 related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall describe the process to identify material impacts, risks and opportunities and shall provide information on:
    1. whether the undertaking has screened its site locations and business activities in order to identify its actual and potential pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities in its own operations and upstream and downstream value chain, and if so, the methodologies, assumptions and tools used in the screening;
    2. whether and how the undertaking has conducted consultations, in particular with affected communities.

 

Application Requirements

AR 1. When conducting a materiality assessment on environmental subtopics, the undertaking shall assess the materiality of pollution in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, and may consider the four phases below, also known as the LEAP approach:

  1. Phase 1: locate where in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain the interface with nature takes place;
  2. Phase 2: evaluate the pollution-related dependencies and impacts;
  3. Phase 3: assess the material risks and opportunities; and
  4. Phase 4: prepare and report the results of the materiality

AR 2. The materiality assessment for ESRS E2 corresponds to the first three phases of this LEAP approach. The fourth phase addresses the outcome of the process.

AR 3. The process to assess the materiality of impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities shall consider the provisions in ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities, and IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement.

AR 4.    The sub-topics covered by the materiality assessment under ESRS E2 include:

  1. pollution of air, water and soil (excluding GHG emissions and waste), microplastics, and substances of concern;
  2. dependencies on ecosystem services that help to mitigate pollution-related

AR 5. In Phase 1, to locate where in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain the interface with nature takes place, the undertaking may consider:

  1. the site locations of direct assets and operations and related upstream and downstream activities across the value chain;
  2. the site locations where emissions of water, soil and air pollutants occur; and
  3. the sectors or business units related to those emissions or to the production, use, distribution, commercialisation and import/export of microplastics, substances of concern, and substances of very high concern, on their own, in mixtures or in

AR 6. Phase 2 relates to the evaluation of the undertaking’s impacts and dependencies for each material site or sector/business unit including by assessing the severity and likelihood of impacts on the environment and human health.

AR 7.    In Phase 3, to assess its material risks and opportunities based on the results of Phases 1 and 2, the undertaking may :

  1. identify transition risks and opportunities in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain by the categories of:
    1. policy and legal: e.g., introduction of regulation, exposure to sanctions and litigation (e.g., negligence towards ecosystems), enhanced reporting obligations;
    2. technology: e.g., substitution of products or services by products or services with a lower impact, transition away from substances of concern;
    3. market: e.g., shifting supply, demand and financing, volatility or increased costs of some substances; and
    4. reputation: e.g., changing societal, customer or community perceptions as a result of an organisation’s role in pollution prevention and control;
  2. identify physical risks, e.g., sudden interruption of access to clean water, acid rain, or other pollution incidents that are likely to lead to or that have led to pollution with subsequent effects on the environment and society;
  3. identify opportunities related to pollution prevention and control categorised by:
    1. resource efficiency: decrease quantities of substances used or improve efficiency of production process to minimise impacts;
    2. markets: g., diversification of business activities;
    3. financing: g., access to green funds, bonds or loans;
    4. resilience: e.g., diversification of substances used and control of emissions through innovation or technology; and
    5. reputation: positive stakeholder relations as a result of a proactive stance on managing risks.

AR 8. In order to assess materiality, the undertaking may consider Commission Recommendation (EU) 2021/2279 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations.

AR 9. When providing information on the outcome of its materiality assessment, the undertaking shall consider:

  1. a list of site locations where pollution is a material issue for the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain; and
  2. a list of business activities associated with pollution material impacts, risks and
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E2.pdf None None None
26 E2 - Pollution Impact, risk and opportunity management E2-1 – Policies related to pollution
  1. The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to pollution prevention and control.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of material pollution-related impacts, risks and

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 12 shall contain the information on the policies the undertaking has in place to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to pollution in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters.

  4. The undertaking shall indicate, with regard to its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, whether and how its policies address the following areas where material:
    1. mitigating negative impacts related to pollution of air, water and soil including prevention and control;
    2. substituting and minimising the use of substances of concern, and phasing out substances of very high concern, in particular for non-essential societal use and in consumer products; and
    3. avoiding incidents and emergency situations, and if and when they occur, controlling and limiting their impact on people and the environment.

 

Application Requirements

AR 10. The policies described under this Disclosure Requirement may be integrated in broader environmental or sustainability policies covering different subtopics.

AR 11. The description  of  the  policies  shall include  information  on the  pollutant(s)  or substance(s) covered.

AR 12. When disclosing information under paragraph 11, the undertaking may include contextual information on the relations between its policies implemented and how they may contribute to the EU Action Plan “Towards a Zero Pollution for Air, Water and Soil” with for instance elements on:

  1. how it is or may be affected by the targets and measures of the EU Action Plan and the revision of existing directives (e.g., the Industrial Emissions Directive);
  2. how it intends to reduce its pollution footprint to contribute to these targets.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E2.pdf None None MDR-P
27 E2 - Pollution Impact, risk and opportunity management E2-2 – Actions and resources related to pollution
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its pollution-related actions and the resources allocated to their implementation.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the key actions taken and planned to achieve the pollution-related policy objectives and targets.

  3. The description of the pollution-related action plans and resources shall contain the information prescribed in ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters.

  4. In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-A, the undertaking may specify to which layer in the following mitigation hierarchy an action and resources can be allocated:
    1. avoid pollution including any phase out of materials or compounds that have a negative impact (prevention of pollution at source);
    2. reduce pollution, including: any phase-out of materials or compounds; meeting enforcement requirements such as Best Available Techniques (BAT) requirements; or meeting the Do No Significant Harm criteria for pollution prevention and control according to the EU Taxonomy Regulation and its Delegated Acts (minimisation of pollution); and
    3. restore, regenerate and transform ecosystems where pollution has occurred (control of the impacts both from regular activities and incidents).

 

Application Requirements

AR 13. Where actions extend to upstream or downstream value chain engagements, the undertaking shall provide information on the types of actions reflecting these engagements.

AR 14. When considering resources, examples of operational expenditures could be investments in research and development to innovate and develop safe and sustainable alternatives to the use of substances of concern or to decrease emissions in a production process.

AR 15. Where relevant to achieve its pollution-related policy objectives and targets, the undertaking may provide information on site-level action plans.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E2.pdf None None MDR-A
28 E2 - Pollution Metrics and targets E2-3 – Targets related to pollution
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the pollution-related targets it has set.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the targets the undertaking has set to support its pollution-related policies and to address its material pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities.

  3. The description of targets shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets.

  4. The disclosure required by paragraph 20 shall indicate whether and how its targets relate to the prevention and control of:
    1. air pollutants and respective specific loads;
    2. emissions to water and respective specific loads;
    3. pollution to soil and respective specific loads; and
    4. substances of concern and substances of very high concern.

  5. In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-T, the undertaking may specify whether ecological thresholds (e.g., the biosphere integrity, stratospheric ozone-depletion, atmospheric aerosol loading, soil depletion, ocean acidification) and entity-specific allocations were taken into consideration when setting targets. If so, the undertaking may specify:
    1. the ecological thresholds identified, and the methodology used to identify such thresholds;
    2. whether or not the thresholds are entity-specific and if so, how they were determined; and
    3. how responsibility for respecting identified ecological thresholds is allocated in the undertaking.

  6. The undertaking shall specify as part of the contextual information, whether the targets that it has set and presented are mandatory (required by legislation) or voluntary.

 

Application Requirements

AR 16. If the undertaking refers to ecological thresholds when setting targets, it may refer to the guidance provided by the Science-Based Targets Initiative for Nature (SBTN) in its interim guidance (Initial Guidance for Business, September 2020), or any other guidance with a scientifically acknowledged methodology that allows setting of science-based targets by identifying ecological thresholds and, if applicable, entity-specific allocations. Ecological thresholds can be local, national and/or global.

AR 17. The undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related to the Substantial Contribution criteria for Pollution Prevention and Control as defined in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 14(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Where the Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria for Pollution Prevention and Control as defined in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 10(3), Article 11(3), Article 12(2), Article 13(2), and Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 are not met, the undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related those DNSH criteria.

AR 18. Where relevant to support the policies it has adopted, the undertaking may provide information on the targets set at site level.

AR 19. The targets may cover the undertaking’s own operations and/or the value chain.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E2.pdf None None MDR-T
29 E2 - Pollution Metrics and targets E2-4 – Pollution of air, water and soil
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the pollutants that it emits through its own operations, as well as the microplastics it generates or uses.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the emissions that the undertaking generates to air, water and soil in its own operations, and of its generation and use of microplastics.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose the amounts of:
    1. each pollutant listed in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council[1] (European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register “EPRTR Regulation”)emitted to air, water and soil, with the exception of emissions of GHGs which are disclosed in accordance with ESRS E1 Climate Change[2];
    2. microplastics generated or used by the undertaking.
  1. The amounts referred in paragraph 28 shall be consolidated amounts including the emissions from those facilities over which the undertaking has financial control and those over which it has operational control. The consolidation shall include only the emissions from facilities for which the applicable threshold value specified in Annex II of Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 is exceeded.

  2. The undertaking shall put its disclosure into context and describe:
    1. the changes over time,
    2. the measurement methodologies; and
    3. the process(es) to collect data for pollution-related accounting and reporting, including the type of data needed and the information sources.

  3. When an inferior methodology compared to direct measurement of emissions is chosen to quantify emissions, the reasons for choosing this inferior methodology shall be outlined by  the undertaking. If the undertaking uses estimates, it shall disclose the standard, sectoral  study or sources which form the basis of its estimates, as well as the possible degree of uncertainty and the range of estimates reflecting the measurement uncertainty.

[1] Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 18 January 2006 concerning the establishment of a European Pollutant Release and Transfer Register and amending Council Directives 91/689/EEC and 96/61/EC (OJ L 033 4.2.2006, p. 1)

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from: (a) an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #2 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Emissions of air pollutants”); (b) indicator #8 in Table I of Annex I (“Emissions to water); (c) indicator #1 in Table II of Annex I ( “Emissions of inorganic pollutants”); and (d) indicator #3 in Table II of Annex I (“Emissions of ozone- depleting substances”)

.

Application Requirements

AR 20. The information to be provided on microplastics under paragraph 28(b) shall include microplastics that have been generated or used during production processes or that are procured, and that leave the undertaking’s facilities as emissions, as products, or as part of products or services. Microplastics may be unintentionally produced when larger pieces of plastics like car tires or synthetic textiles wear and tear or may be deliberately manufactured and added to products for specific purposes (e.g., exfoliating beads in facial or body scrubs).

AR 21. The volume of pollutants shall be presented in appropriate mass units, for example tonnes or kilogrammes.

AR 22. The information required under this Disclosure Requirement shall be provided at the level of the reporting undertaking. However, the undertaking may disclose additional breakdown including information at site level or a breakdown of its emissions by type of source, by sector or by geographical area.

AR 23. When providing contextual information on the emissions, the undertaking may consider:

  1. the local air quality indices (AQI) for the area where the undertaking’s air pollution occurs;
  2. the degree of urbanisation (DEGURBA)66 for the area where air pollution occurs; and
  3. the undertaking’s percentage of the total emissions of pollutants to water and soil occurring in areas at water risk, including areas of high-water stress.

66 According to Eurostat, the Degree of urbanisation (DEGURBA) is a classification that indicates the character of an area. Based on the share of local population living in urban clusters and in urban centres, it classifies Local Administrative Units (LAU or communes) into three types of area: i) Cities (densely populated areas), ii) Towns and suburbs (intermediate density areas), and iii) Rural areas (thinly populated areas).

AR 24. The information provided under this Disclosure Requirement may refer to information the undertaking is already required to report under other existing legislation (i.e., IED, E- PRTR, etc.).

AR 25. Where the undertaking’s activities are subject to Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council on industrial emissions (IED)67 and relevant Best Available Techniques Reference Documents (BREFs), irrespective of whether the activity takes place within the European Union or not, the undertaking may disclose the following additional information:

  1. a list of installations operated by the undertaking that fall under the IED and EU-BAT Conclusions;
  2. a list of any non-compliance incidents or enforcement actions necessary to ensure compliance in case of breaches of permit conditions;
  3. the actual performance, as specified in the EU-BAT conclusions for industrial installations, and comparison of the undertaking’s environmental performance against “emission levels associated with the best available techniques” the (BAT- AEL) as described in EU-BAT conclusions;
  4. the actual performance of the undertaking against “environmental performance levels associated with the best available techniques(BAT-AEPLs) provided that they are applicable to the sector and installation; and
  5. a list of any compliance schedules or derogations granted by competent authorities according to Art. 15(4) Directive 2010/75/EU that are associated with the implementation of BAT-AELs.

67 Directive 2010/75/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 November 2010 on industrial emissions (integrated pollution prevention and control) (OJ L 334, 17.12.2010, p. 17).

Methodologies

AR 26. When providing information on pollutants, the undertaking shall consider approaches for quantification in the following order of priority:

  1. direct measurement of emissions, effluents or other pollution through the use of recognised continuous monitoring systems (e.g., AMS Automated Measuring Systems);
  2. periodic measurements;
  3. calculation based on site-specific data;
  4. calculation based on published pollution factors; and
  5. estimation.

AR 27. Regarding the disclosure of methodologies required by paragraph 30, the undertaking shall consider:

  • whether its monitoring is carried out in accordance with EU BREF Standards or another relevant reference benchmark; and
  • whether and how the calibration tests of the AMS were undertaken and the verification of periodic measurement by independent labs were ensured.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E2.pdf None None None
30 E2 - Pollution Metrics and targets E2-5 – Substances of concern and substances of very high concern
  1. The undertaking shall disclose information on the production, use, distribution, commercialisation and import/export of substances of concern and substances of very high concern, on their own, in mixtures or in articles.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the impact of the undertaking on health and the environment through substances of concern and through substances of very high concern on their own. It is also to enable an understanding of the undertaking’s material risks and opportunities, including exposure to those substances and risks arising from changes in regulations.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 32 shall include the total amounts of substances of concern that are generated or used during the production or that are procured, and the total amounts of substances of concern that leave its facilities as emissions, as products, or as part of products or services split into main hazard classes of substances of concern.

  4. The undertaking shall present separately the information for substances of very high concern.

Application Requirements

List of substances to be considered

AR 28. In order for the information to be complete, substances in the undertaking’s own operations and those procured shall be included (e.g., embedded in ingredients, semi- finished products, or the final product).

AR 29. The volume of pollutants shall be presented in mass units, for example tonnes or kilogrammes or other mass units appropriate for the volumes and type of pollutants being released.

Contextual information

AR 30. The information provided under this Disclosure Requirement may refer to information the undertaking is already required to report under other existing legislation (i.e., Directive 2010/75/EU, Regulation (EC) No 166/2006 “E-PRTR”, etc.).

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E2.pdf None None None
31 E2 - Pollution Metrics and targets E2-6 – Anticipated financial effects from pollution-related impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the anticipated financial effects of material pollution-related risks and opportunities.

  2. The information required by paragraph 36 is in addition to the information on current financial effects on the undertaking’s, financial position, financial performance and cash flows for the reporting period required under ESRS 2 SBM-3 para 48 (d).

  3. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
    1. anticipated financial effects due to material risks arising from pollution-related impacts and dependencies and how these risks have (or could reasonably be expected to have) a material influence on the undertaking’s , financial position financial performance and cash flows, over the short-, medium- and long-term.
    2. anticipated financial effects due to material opportunities related to pollution prevention and control.

  4. The disclosure shall include:
    1. a quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms before considering pollution-related actions, or where not possible without undue cost or effort, qualitative information. For financial effects arising from opportunities, a quantification is not required if it would result in disclosure that does not meet the qualitative characteristics of information (see ESRS 1 Appendix B Qualitative characteristics of information);
    2. a description of the effects considered, the related impacts and the time horizons in which they are likely to materialise; and
    3. the critical assumptions used to quantify the anticipated financial effects, as well as the sources and level of uncertainty of those assumptions.

  5. The information provided under paragraph 38(a) shall include:
    1. the share of net revenue made with products and services that are or that contain substances of concern, and the share of net revenue made with products and services that are or that contain substances of very high concern;
    2. the operating and capital expenditures incurred in the reporting period in conjunction with major incidents and deposits;
    3. the provisions for environmental protection and remediation costs, e.g., for rehabilitating contaminated sites, recultivating landfills, removal of environmental contamination at existing production or storage sites and similar measures.

  6. The undertaking shall disclose any relevant contextual information including a description of material incidents and deposits whereby pollution had negative impacts on the environment and/or is expected to have negative effects on the undertaking’s financial cash flows, financial position and financial performance with short-, medium- and long-term time horizons.

Application Requirements

AR 31. The operating and capital expenditures related to incidents and deposits may include for instance:

  1. cost for eliminating and remediating the respective pollution of air, water and soil including environmental protection;
  2. damage compensation costs including payment of fines and penalties imposed by regulators or government authorities.

AR 32. Incidents may include for instance interruptions of production, whether arising from the supply chain and/or from own operations, which resulted in pollution.

AR 33. The undertaking may include an assessment of its related products and services at risk over the short-, medium- and long-term, explaining how these are defined, how financial amounts are estimated, and which critical assumptions are made.

AR 34. The quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms under paragraph 38(a) may be a single amount or a range.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E2.pdf None None None
32 E3 - Water and marine resources Impact, risk and opportunity management E3 related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall describe the process to identify material impacts, risks and opportunities and shall provide information on:
    1. whether and how the undertaking it has screened its assets and activities in order to identify its actual and potential water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, and if so the methodologies, assumptions and tools used in the screening;
    2. whether and how it has conducted consultations, in particular, with affected communities[1].

[1] Source: IFC Performance Standard 6, 2012.

 

Application Requirements

AR 1. When conducting a materiality assessment on environmental subtopics, the undertaking shall assess the materiality of water and marine resources in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, and may consider the four phases below, also known as the LEAP approach:

  1. Phase 1: locate where in its own operations and along the value chain the interface with nature takes place;
  2. Phase 2: evaluate the dependencies and impacts;
  3. Phase 3: assess the material risks and opportunities; and
  4. Phase 4: prepare and report the results of the materiality

AR 2. The materiality assessment for ESRS E3 corresponds to the first three phases of this LEAP approach, the fourth phase addresses the outcome of the process.

AR 3. The processes to assess the materiality of impacts, risks and opportunities shall consider the provisions in ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities, and IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement.

AR 4.  The sub-topics related to water and marine resources covered by the materiality assessment include:

  1. water, which encompasses the consumption of surface water, groundwater, as well as withdrawals and discharges of water; and
  2. marine resources, which encompasses the extraction and use of such resources and associated economic activities.

AR 5. In phase 1, to locate where there are areas at water risk, and areas where there is an interface with marine resources that could lead to material impacts and dependencies in its own operations and along its upstream and downstream value chain, the undertaking may consider:

  1. the locations of direct assets and operations and related upstream and downstream activities across the value chain;
  2. the sites located in areas at water risk, including areas of high-water stress; and
  3. the sectors or business units that are interfacing with water or marine resources in these priority locations.

AR 6. The undertaking shall consider river basins as the relevant level for assessment of locations and combine that approach with an operational risk assessment of its facilities and the facilities of suppliers with material impacts and risks.

AR 7.  The undertaking shall consider the criteria for defining the status of water bodies according to the relevant Annexes of Directive 2000/60/EC (Water Framework Directive) as well as the guidance documents provided for implementation of the Water Framework Directive. The list of guidance documents can be accessed under the European Commission’s Environment home page.

AR 8. In phase 2, to evaluate its impacts and dependencies for each priority location identified under AR 5, the undertaking may:

  1. identify business processes and activities that lead to impacts and dependencies on environmental assets and ecosystem services;
  2. identify water and marine resources-related impacts and dependencies across the undertaking’s value chain; and
  3. assess the severity and likelihood of the positive and negative impacts on water and marine resources.

AR 9. For the identification of water and marine resources-related dependencies, the undertaking may rely on international classifications such as the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES).

AR 10. When identifying its marine resources-related dependencies, the undertaking shall consider if it depends upon key marine resources-related commodities, including but not limited to gravels and seafood products.

AR 11. Marine resources are defined according to their use by human societies and must be considered in relation to the pressure they are subject to. Some of the pressure indicators are presented in other ESRS, namely microplastics and emissions to water in ESRS E2 and plastic waste in ESRS E5.

AR 12. Examples of marine resources dependencies which may be considered by the undertaking are:

  1. dependencies on commercially exploited fish and shellfish in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain; and
  2. fishing activity that involves mobile bottom trawling, which can also have negative impacts on the seabed.

AR 13. In Phase 3, to assess its material risks and opportunities based on the results of Phases 1 and 2, the undertaking may :

  1. identify transition risks and opportunities in its own operations and its value chain by the categories of:
    1. policy and legal: e.g., introduction of regulation or policy (e.g., changes such as increased water protection, increased quality of water regulations, regulation of flows of water supply), ineffective governance of water bodies or marine resources, in particular across boundaries (e.g., transboundary governance and cooperation) resulting in water or oceans degradation, exposure to sanctions and litigation (e.g., non-respect of permits or allocations; negligence towards or killing of threatened marine species), enhanced reporting obligations on marine ecosystems and related services;
    2. technology: e.g., substitution of products or services by products or services with a lower impact on water and marine resources, transition to more efficient and cleaner technologies (i.e., with lower impacts on oceans and water), new monitoring technologies (e.g., satellite), water purification, flood protection;
    3. market: e.g., shifting supply, demand and financing, volatility or increased costs of water or marine resources;
    4. reputation: e.g., changing societal, customer or community perceptions as a result of an organisation’s impact on water and marine resources; and
    5. contribution to systemic risks via its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, including the risks that a marine ecosystem collapses or the risks that a critical natural system no longer functions (e.g., tipping points are reached, summing physical risks);
  2. identify physical risk including water quantity (water scarcity, water stress), water quality, infrastructure decay or unavailability of some marine resources-related commodities (e.g. the rarefaction of some species of fish or other underwater marine living organisms sold as products by the undertaking) leading for instance to the impossibility of running operations in certain geographical areas;
  3. identify opportunities categorised by:
    1. resource efficiency: e.g., transition to more efficient services and processes requiring less water and marine resources;
    2. markets: e.g., development of less resource-intense products and services, diversification of business activities;
    3. financing: g., access to green funds, bonds or loans;
    4. resilience: e.g., diversification of marine or water resources and business activities (e.g., starting a new business unit on ecosystem restoration), investing in green infrastructures, nature-based solutions, adopting recycling and circularity mechanisms that reduce the dependencies on water or marine resources; and
    5. reputation: positive stakeholder engagement as a result of a proactive stance on managing nature-related risks (e.g., leading to preferred partner status).

AR 14. The undertaking may rely on primary, secondary or modelled data collection or other relevant approaches to assess material impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities, including Commission Recommendation 2021/2279 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organisations (Annex I – Product Environmental Footprint; Annex III – Organisation Environmental Footprint).

AR 15. When providing information on the outcome of the materiality assessment, the undertaking shall consider:

  1. a list of geographical areas where water is a material issue for the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain;
  2. a list of marine resources-related commodities used by the undertaking which are material to the good environmental status of marine waters as well as for the protection of marine resources; and
  3. a list of sectors or segments associated with water and marine resources material impacts, risks and opportunities.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E3.pdf None None None
33 E3 - Water and marine resources Impact, risk and opportunity management E3-1 – Policies related to water and marine resources
  1. The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to water and marine resources[1].

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of its material water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 9 shall contain the information on the policies the undertaking has in place to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to water and marine resources in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters.

  4. The undertaking shall indicate whether and how its policies address the following matters where material:
    1. water management including:
      1. the use and sourcing of water and marine resources in its own operations;
      2. water treatment as a step towards more sustainable sourcing of water; and
      3. the prevention and abatement of water pollution resulting from its activities.
    2. product and service design in view of addressing water-related issues and the preservation of marine resources; and
    3. commitment to reduce material water consumption in areas at water risk in its own operations and along the upstream and downstream value chain.
  1. If at least one of the sites of the undertaking is located in an area of high-water stress and it is not covered by a policy, the undertaking shall state this to be the case and provide reasons for not having adopted such a policy. The undertaking may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to adopt such a policy.[2]
  2. The undertaking shall specify whether it has adopted policies or practices related to sustainable oceans and seas[3].

 

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #7 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies without water management policies”).

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #8 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Exposure to areas of high water stress”).

[3] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #12 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments ( “Investments in companies without sustainable oceans/seas practices”).

Application Requirements

AR 16. The policies described under this Disclosure Requirement may be integrated in broader environmental or sustainability policies covering different subtopics.

AR 17. When disclosing information under paragraph 9, the undertaking may disclose whether its policies :

  1. prevent further deterioration and protect and enhance the status of water bodies and aquatic ecosystems;
  2. promote sustainable water use based on a long-term protection of available water resources;
  3. aim at enhanced protection and improvement of the aquatic environment;
  4. promote a good environmental status of marine water; and
  5. promote reduction of water withdrawals and water discharges.

AR 18. The undertaking may also disclose information about policies which:

  1. contribute to good ecological and chemical quality of surface water bodies and good chemical quality and quantity of groundwater bodies, in order to protect human health, water supply, natural ecosystems and biodiversity, the good environmental status of marine waters and the protection of the resource base upon which marine related activities depend;
  2. minimise material impacts and risks and implement mitigation measures that aim to maintain the value and functionality of priority services and to increase resource efficiency on own operations; and
  3. avoid impacts on affected communities.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E3.pdf None None MDR-P
34 E3 - Water and marine resources Impact, risk and opportunity management E3-2 – Actions and resources related to water and marine resources
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its water and marine resources-related actions and the resources allocated to their implementation.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the key actions taken and planned to achieve the water and marine resources-related policy objectives and targets.

  3. The description of the actions and resources shall follow the principles defined in ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters. In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-A, the undertaking may specify to which layer in the mitigation hierarchy an action and

  4. Resources can be allocated to:
    1. avoid the use of water and marine resources;
    2. reduce the use of water and marine resources such as through efficiency measures;
    3. reclaiming and reuse of water; or
    4. restoration and regeneration of aquatic ecosystem and water bodies.

  5. The undertaking shall specify actions and resources in relation to areas at water risk, including areas of high-water stress.

 

Application Requirements

AR 19. When disclosing information required under paragraph 15, the undertaking shall consider  the actions, or action plans, contributing to address the material impacts, risks and opportunities identified. Useful guidance is provided by the Alliance for Water Stewardship (AWS).

AR 20. Considering that water and marine resources are shared resources which may require collective actions, or action plans, involving other stakeholders, the undertaking may provide information on those specific collective actions, including information on other parties (competitors, suppliers, retailers, customers, other business partners, local communities and authorities, government agencies…) and specific information on the project, its specific contribution, its sponsors and other participants.

AR 21. When providing information on capital expenditures, the undertaking may consider expenditures related, for example, to stormwater drain rehabilitation, pipelines, or machinery used to manufacture new low water-use products.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E3.pdf None None MDR-A
35 E3 - Water and marine resources Metrics and targets E3-3 – Targets related to water and marine resources
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the water and marine resources-related targets it has set.
  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the targets the undertaking has adopted to support its water and marine resources-related policies and address its material water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities.
  3. The description of the targets shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets.
  4. The disclosure required by paragraph 20 shall indicate whether and how its targets relate to:
    • the management of material impacts, risks and opportunities related to areas at water risk, including improvement of the water quality;
    • the responsible management of marine resources impacts, risks and opportunities including the nature and quantity of marine resources-related commodities (such as gravels, deep-sea minerals, seafood) used by the undertaking; and
    • the reduction of water consumption, including an explanation of how those targets relate to areas at water risk, including areas of high water-stress.
  5. In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-T, the undertaking may specify whether ecological thresholds and entity-specific allocations were taken into consideration when setting targets. If so, the undertaking may specify:
    • the ecological thresholds identified, and the methodology used to identify such thresholds;
    • whether or not the thresholds are entity-specific and if so, how they were determined; and
    • how responsibility for respecting identified ecological thresholds is allocated in the undertaking.
  6. The undertaking shall specify as part of the contextual information, whether the targets it has set and presented are mandatory (required by legislation) or voluntary.

Application Requirements

AR 22. If the undertaking refers to ecological thresholds when setting targets, it may refer to the guidance provided by the Science-Based Targets Initiative for Nature (SBTN) in its interim guidance (Initial Guidance for Business, September 2020). It may also refer to any other guidance with a scientifically acknowledged methodology that enables the setting of science-based targets by identifying ecological thresholds and, if applicable, organisation6specific allocations. Ecological thresholds can be local, national and/or global.

AR 23. The undertaking may provide targets relating to:

  1. the reduction of water withdrawals; and
  2. the reduction of water discharges.

AR 24. If the undertaking provides targets on withdrawals, it may include water withdrawal from polluted soils and aquifers, and water withdrawn and treated for remediation purposes.

AR 25. If the undertaking provides targets on discharges, it may include water discharges to groundwater such as reinjection to aquifers, or water returning to a groundwater source via a soakaway or a swale.

AR 26. The targets may cover its own operations and/or its upstream and downstream value chain.

AR 27. The undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related to the Substantial Contribution criteria for Water and Marine Resources as defined in the Commission delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 12(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Where the Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria  for Water and Marine Resources as defined in delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 10(3), Article 11(3), Article 13(2), Article 14(2), and Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 are not met, the undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related those DNSH criteria.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E3.pdf None None MDR-T
36 E3 - Water and marine resources Metrics and targets E3-4 – Water consumption
  1. The undertaking shall disclose information on its water consumption performance related to its material impacts, risks and opportunities.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s water consumption and any progress by the undertaking in relation to its targets.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 26 relates to own operations and shall include:
    • total water consumption in m3;
    • total water consumption in m3 in areas at water risk, including areas of high-water stress;
    • total water recycled and reused in m3;[1]
    • total water stored and changes in storage in m3; and
    • any contextual information necessary regarding points (a) to (d), including the water basins’ water quality and quantity, how the data have been compiled, such as any standards, methodologies, and assumptions used, including whether the information is calculated, estimated, modelled, or sourced from direct measurements, and the approach taken for this, such as the use of any sector-specific factors.
  4. The undertaking shall provide information on its water intensity: total water consumption in its own operations in m3 per million EUR net revenue76.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #6.2 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 regarding disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Water usage and recycling”, 2. Weighted average percentage of water recycled and reused by investee companies). 76 This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #6.1 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Water usage and recycling”, 1. Average amount of water consumed by the investee companies (in cubic meters) per million EUR of revenue of investee companies).

76This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #6.1 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Water usage and recycling”, 1. Average amount of water consumed by the investee companies (in cubic meters) per million EUR of revenue of investee companies).

Application Requirements

AR 28. The undertaking may operate in various areas at water risk. When disclosing information under paragraph 28 (b), the undertaking shall include such information only for those areas that have been identified as material in accordance with ESRS2 IRO-1 and ESRS2 SBM-3

AR 29. When disclosing contextual information on water consumption performance required by paragraph 26, the undertaking shall explain the calculation methodologies and more specifically the share of the measure obtained from direct measurement, from sampling and extrapolation, or from best estimates.

AR 30. The undertaking may provide information on other breakdowns (i.e., per sector or segments).

AR 31. When disclosing information required by paragraph 29 the undertaking may provide additional intensity ratios based on other denominators.

AR 32. The undertaking may also provide information on its water withdrawals and water discharges.  

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E3.pdf None None None
37 E3 - Water and marine resources Metrics and targets E3-5 – Anticipated financial effects from water and marine resources-related impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the anticipated financial effects of material water and marine resources-related risks and opportunities.

  2. The information required by paragraph 30 is in addition to the information on current financial effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows for the reporting period required under ESRS 2 SBM-3 para 48 (d).

  3. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
    1. anticipated financial effects due to material risks arising from water and marine resources-related impacts and dependencies and how these risks have (or could reasonably be expected to have) a material influence on the undertaking’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows, over the short-, medium- and long-term; and
    2. anticipated financial effects due to material opportunities related to water and marine resources.

  4. The disclosure shall include:
    1. a quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms before considering water and marine resources-related actions or where not possible without undue cost or effort, qualitative information. For financial effects arising from opportunities, a quantification is not required if it would result in disclosure that does not meet the qualitative characteristics of information (see ESRS 1 Appendix B Qualitative characteristics of information);
    2. a description of the effects considered, the impacts and dependencies to which they relate, and the time horizons in which they are likely to materialise; and
    3. the critical assumptions used to quantify the anticipated financial effects, as well as the sources and level of uncertainty of those assumptions.

 

Application Requirements

AR 33. The undertaking may include an assessment of its related products and services at risk over the short-, medium- and long-term, explaining how these are defined, how financial amounts are estimated, and which critical assumptions are made.

AR 34. The quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms under paragraph 39(a) may be a single amount or a range.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E3.pdf None None None
38 E4 - Biodiversity and ecosystems Strategy E4-1 – Transition plan and consideration of biodiversity and ecosystems in strategy and business model
  1. The undertaking shall disclose how its biodiversity and ecosystem impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities originate from and trigger adaptation of its strategy and business model.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the resilience of the undertaking’s strategy and business model in relation to biodiversity and ecosystems, and of the compatibility of the undertaking’s strategy and business model with regard to relevant local, national and global public policy targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems.

  3. The undertaking shall describe the resilience of its strategy and business model in relation to biodiversity and ecosystems. The description shall include:
    1. an assessment of the resilience of the current business model and strategy to biodiversity and ecosystems-related physical, transition and systemic risks;
    2. the scope of the resilience analysis in relation to the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain and in relation to the risks considered in that analysis;
    3. the key assumptions made;
    4. the time horizons used;
    5. the results of the resilience analysis; and
    6. the involvement of stakeholders, including, where appropriate, holders of indigenous and local knowledge.

  4. If information specified in this disclosure requirement is disclosed by the undertaking as part of the information required under ESRS 2 SBM-3, the undertaking may refer to the information it has disclosed under ESRS 2 SBM-3.

  5. The undertaking may disclose its transition plan to improve and, ultimately, achieve alignment of its business model and strategy with the vision of the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework and its relevant goals and targets, the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, and with respecting planetary boundaries related to biosphere integrity and land-system change.  

 

Application Requirements

AR 1. If disclosing a transition plan, the undertaking may:

  1. explain how it will adjust its strategy and business model to improve and, ultimately, achieve alignment with relevant local, national and global public policy goals and targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems including the vision of the KunmingMontreal Global Biodiversity Framework and its relevant goals and targets, the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030, and Directive 2009/147/EC Council Directive 92/43/EEC (the EU Birds and Habitats Directives) and, as appropriate, planetary boundaries related to biosphere integrity and land-system change;
  2. include information about its own operations and also explain how it is responding to material impacts in its upstream and downstream value chain identified in its materiality assessment in accordance with ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities;
  3. explain how its strategy interacts with its transition plan;
  4. explain how it contributes to addressing biodiversity and ecosystem impact drivers and its possible mitigation actions following the mitigation hierarchy and the main path-dependencies and locked-in assets and resources (e.g., plants, raw materials) that are associated with biodiversity and ecosystems change;
  5. explain and quantify its investments and funding supporting the implementation of its transition plan, with a reference to the key performance indicators of taxonomy-aligned CapEx, and where relevant the CapEx plans, that the undertaking discloses in accordance with Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178;
  6. if it has economic activities that are covered by delegated regulations on biodiversity under the Taxonomy Regulation, explain any objective or plans (CapEX, CapEx plans) that it has for aligning its economic activities (revenues, CapEx) with the criteria established in those delegated regulations;
  7. explain how biodiversity offsets are used as part of the transition plan, and if so, where the offsets are planned to be used, the extent of use in relation to the overall transition plan, and whether the mitigation hierarchy was considered;
  8. explain how the process of implementing and updating the transition plan is managed;
  9. explain how it measures progress, namely indicate the metrics and methodologies it uses for that purpose; 
  10. indicate whether the administrative, management and supervisory bodies have approved the transition plan; and
  11. indicate current challenges and limitations to draft a plan in relation to areas of significant impact and how the company is addressing those challenges.

AR2. If disclosing a transition plan, the undertaking may, for example, refer to the following targets from the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030:

  1. The decline of pollinators is reversed.
  2. The risk and use of chemical pesticides is reduced by 50%, and the use of more hazardous pesticides is reduced by 50%.
  3. At least 25% of agricultural land is under organic farming management, and the uptake of agro-ecological practices is significantly increased.
  4. Three billion additional trees are planted in the EU, in full respect of ecological principles.
  5. Significant progress in the remediation of contaminated soil sites.
  6. At least 25,000 km of free-flowing rivers are restored.
  7. The losses of nutrients from fertilisers are reduced by 50%, resulting in the reduction of the use of fertilisers by at least 20%.
  8. The negative impacts on sensitive species and habitats, including on the seabed through fishing and extraction activities, are substantially reduced to achieve good environmental status.

AR3. If disclosing a transition plan, the undertaking may also refer to the Sustainable Development Goals, in particular:

  1. SDG 2 - End hunger, achieve food security and improved nutrition and promote sustainable agriculture;
  2. SDG 6 - Ensure availability and sustainable management of water and sanitation for all;
  3. SDG 14 - Conserve and sustainably use the oceans, seas and marine resources for sustainable development; and
  4. SDG 15 - Protect, restore and promote sustainable use of terrestrial ecosystems, sustainably manage forests, combat desertification, and halt and reverse land degradation and halt biodiversity loss.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E4.pdf None None None
39 E4 - Biodiversity and ecosystems Strategy E4 related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
  1. The undertaking shall disclose:
  1. a list of material sites in its own operations, including sites under its operational control, based on the results of paragraph 17(a). The undertaking shall disclose these locations by:
    1. specifying the activities negatively affecting biodiversity sensitive areas[1];
    2. providing a breakdown of sites according to the impacts and dependencies identified, and to the ecological status of the areas (with reference to the specific ecosystem baseline level) where they are located; and
    3. specifying the biodiversity-sensitive areas impacted, for users to be able to determine the location and the responsible competent authority with regards to the activities specified in paragraph 16(a) i.
  2. whether it has identified material negative impacts with regards to land degradation, desertification or soil sealing[2]; and
  3. whether it has operations that affect threatened species[3].

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial markets participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #7 in Table 1 Annex 1 of the related Delegated Regulation with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments ( “Activities negatively affecting biodiversity-sensitive areas”). 

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #10 in Table 2 of Annex 1 of the related Delegated Regulation with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Land degradation, desertification, soil sealing”). 

[3] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #14 in Table 2 of Annex 1 of the related Delegated Regulation with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Natural species and protected areas”). 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E4.pdf None None None
40 E4 - Biodiversity and ecosystems Impact, risk and opportunity management E4 related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 - Description of processes to identify and assess material biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall describe its process to identify material impacts, risks, dependencies and opportunities. The description of the process shall include whether and how the undertaking:
    1. identified and assessed actual and potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems at own site locations and in the upstream and downstream value chain, including assessment criteria applied;
    2. identified and assessed dependencies on biodiversity and ecosystems and their services at own site locations and in the upstream and downstream value chain, including assessment criteria applied, and, if this assessment includes ecosystem services that are disrupted or likely to be;
    3. identified and assessed transition and physical risks and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems, including assessment criteria applied based on its impacts and dependencies;
    4. considered systemic risks;
    5. conducted consultations with affected communities on sustainability assessments of shared biological resources and ecosystems and, in particular:
      1. when a site, a raw material production or sourcing is likely to negatively impact biodiversity and ecosystems, the identification of the specific sites, raw materials production or sourcing with negative or potentially negative impacts on affected communities;
      2. when affected communities are likely to be impacted, the undertaking, shall disclose how these communities were involved in the materiality assessment; and
      3. with respect to impacts on ecosystem services of relevance to affected communities in its own operations, the undertaking shall indicate how negative impacts may be avoided. If these impacts are unavoidable, the undertaking may indicate its plans to minimise them and implement mitigation measures that aim to maintain the value and functionality of priority services.
  1. The undertaking may disclose whether and how it has used biodiversity and ecosystems scenario analysis to inform the identification and assessment of material risks and opportunities over short-, medium- and long-term time horizons. If the undertaking has used such scenario analysis, it may disclose the following information:
    1. why the considered scenarios were selected;
    2. how the considered scenarios are updated according to evolving conditions and emerging trends; and
    3. whether the scenarios are informed by expectations published by authoritative intergovernmental bodies, such as the Convention for Biological Diversity and, where relevant, by scientific consensus, such as that expressed by the Intergovernmental Science-policy Platform on Biodiversity and Ecosystem Services (IPBES).
  2. The undertaking shall specifically disclose:
    1. whether or not it has sites located in or near biodiversity-sensitive areas and whether activities related to these sites negatively affect these areas by leading to the deterioration of natural habitats and the habitats of species and to the disturbance of the species for which a protected area has been designated; and
    2. whether it has been concluded that it is necessary to implement biodiversity mitigation measures, such as those identified in: Directive 2009/147/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council on the conservation of wild birds; Council Directive 92/43/EEC on the conservation of natural habitats and of wild fauna and flora; an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) as defined in Article 1(2), point (g), of Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council[1] on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment; and for activities located in third countries, in accordance with equivalent national provisions or international standards, such as the International Finance Corporation (IFC) Performance Standard 6: Biodiversity Conservation and Sustainable Management of Living Natural Resources.

[1] Directive 2011/92/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2011 on the assessment of the effects of certain public and private projects on the environment (OJ L 26, 28.1.2012, p. 1). 

 

 

Application Requirements

AR 4. The materiality assessment under ESRS E4 includes the undertaking’s:

  1. contribution to direct impact drivers on biodiversity loss[1]:
    1. climate change;
    2. land-use change (e.g., land artificialisation), freshwater-use change and sea-use change;
    3. direct exploitation;
    4.  invasive alien species;
    5. pollution; and
    6. others.
  2. impacts on the state of species (i.e., species population size, species global extinction risk);
  3. impacts on the extent and condition of ecosystems including through land degradation, desertification and soil sealing); and
  4. impacts and dependencies on ecosystem services.

AR5. When assessing the materiality of impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities the undertaking shall consider the provisions in ESRS 2 IRO-1 and ESRS 1 Chapter 3 Double materiality as the basis for sustainability disclosures and describe its considerations.

AR6. The undertaking shall assess the materiality of biodiversity and ecosystems in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, and may conduct its materiality assessment in line with the first three phases of the LEAP approach: Locate (paragraph AR 7), Evaluate (paragraph AR 8) and Assess (paragraph AR 9). 

AR7. Phase 1 relates to the localisation of relevant sites regarding its interface with biodiversity and ecosystems. To identify these relevant sites the undertaking may:

  1. develop a list of locations of direct assets and operations and related upstream and downstream value chain that are relevant to the undertakings business activities. Furthermore, the undertaking may provide information about sites for which future operations have been formally announced;
  2. list the biomes and ecosystems it is interfacing with based on the list of locations identified under paragraph AR 7(a);
  3. identify the current integrity and importance of biodiversity and ecosystem at each location taking into consideration the information provided in paragraphs 16 and 17;
  4. develop a list of locations where the undertaking is interfacing with locations in or near biodiversity-sensitive areas taking into consideration the information provided in paragraphs 16 and 17; and
  5. identify which sectors, business units, value chains or asset classes are  interfacing with biodiversity and ecosystems in these material sites. Instead of identifying these interfaces per site, the undertaking may choose to identify them per raw material procured or sold by weight in tons, if such practice offers greater transparency.

AR 8. In Phase 2, to evaluate its actual or potential impacts and dependencies on biodiversity and ecosystems for relevant sites, the undertaking may:

  1. identify business processes and activities that interface with biodiversity and ecosystems;
  2. identify actual and potential impacts and dependencies;
  3. indicate the size, scale, frequency of occurrence and timeframe of the impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems taking into consideration the disclosures under paragraphs 16 and 17. Furthermore, the undertaking may disclose:
    1. the percentage of its suppliers’ facilities which are located in risk prone areas (with threatened species on the IUCN Red List of Species, the Birds and Habitats Directive or nationally list of threatened species, or in officially recognised Protected Areas, the Natura 2000 network of protected areas and Key Biodiversity Areas);
    2. the percentage of its procurement spend from suppliers with facilities which are located in risk prone areas (with threatened species on the IUCN Red List of Species, the Birds and Habitats Directive or nationally list of threatened species, or in officially recognised Protected Areas, the Natura 2000 network of protected areas and Key Biodiversity Areas); and
  4. indicate the size and scale of the dependencies on biodiversity and ecosystems, including on raw materials, natural resources and ecosystem services. The undertaking may rely on the international classifications such as the Common International Classification of Ecosystem Services (CICES).

AR 9.   In Phase 3, to assesses its material risks and opportunities based on the results of Phases 1 and 2, the undertaking may consider the following categories:

  1. physical risks:
    1. acute risks (e.g., natural disasters exacerbated by loss of coastal protection from ecosystems, leading to costs of storm damage to coastal infrastructure, disease or pests affecting the species or variety of crop the undertaking relies on, especially in the case of no or low genetic diversity, species loss and ecosystem degradation); and
    2. chronic risks (e.g., loss of crop yield due to decline in pollination services, increasing scarcity or variable production of key natural inputs, ecosystem degradation due to operations leading to, for example, coastal erosion and forest fragmentation, ocean acidification, land loss to desertification and soil degradation and consequent loss of soil fertility, species loss).
  2. transition risks, including:
    1. policy and legal: e.g. introduction of regulation or policy (e.g. changes such as increased land protection); exposure to sanctions and litigation (e.g. spills of polluting effluents that damage human and ecosystem health; or violation of biodiversity-related rights, permits or allocations; or negligence towards or killing of threatened species); enhanced reporting obligations on biodiversity, ecosystems and related services;
    2. technology: e.g. substitution of products or services by products or services with a lower impact on biodiversity or dependence on ecosystem services, lack of access to data or access to poor quality data that hamper biodiversity-related assessments, transition to more efficient and cleaner technologies (i.e. with lower impacts on biodiversity), new monitoring technologies (e.g. satellite), requirements to use certain technologies (e.g. climate resistant crops, mechanical pollinators, water purification, flood protection);
    3. market: e.g., shifting supply, demand and financing, volatility or increased costs of raw materials (e.g., biodiversity-intense inputs for which price has risen due to ecosystem degradation);
    4. reputation: e.g., changing societal, customer or community perceptions as a result of an organisation’s role in loss of biodiversity, violation of nature-related rights through operations, negative media coverage due to impacts on critical species and/or ecosystems, biodiversity-related social conflicts over endangered species, protected areas, resources or pollution.
  3. systemic risks, including:
    1. ecosystem collapse risks that a critical natural system no longer functions, e.g., tipping points are reached and the collapse of ecosystems resulting in wholesale geographic or sector losses (summing physical risks);
    2. aggregated risk linked to fundamental impacts of biodiversity loss to levels of transition and physical risk across one or more sectors in a portfolio (corporate or financial); and
    3. contagion risks that financial difficulties of certain corporations or financial institutions linked to failure to account for exposure to biodiversity-related risks spill over to the economic system as a whole.
  4. opportunities, including for example:
    1. business performance categories: resource efficiency; products and services; markets; capital flow and financing; reputational capital; and
    2. sustainability performance categories: ecosystem protection, restoration and regeneration; sustainability use of natural resources.

Presentation of information:

 AR 10. The undertaking may consider the tables below to facilitate its materiality assessment of material sites identified under paragraph AR 7:

Ecosystem service…

Actual or potential dependencies

...

Change of functionality

Financial loss

Limited, moderate or significant

Limited, moderate or significant

 

 

Site location

Threatened species, protected areas, key biodiversity areas

Actual or potential impacts

Frequency

of

occurrence

Speed of impact

Severity of impact

Potential for mitigation

High, medium or low

<1 year or 1-3 years or >3 years

High, medium

or low

High, medium or low

With regard to AR 7(e), the undertaking may consider using the table below:

Where are the raw materials produced or sourced from?

Absolute weight of raw materials (and percentage of the raw material weight)

In areas with species listed on the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species, the Birds and Habitats Directive or on national lists of threated species

In officially recognised protected Areas

In other Key Biodiversity Areas

 

[1] The direct driver climate change is to be reported under ESRS E1 Climate Change and pollution under ESRS E2 Pollution.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E4.pdf None None None
41 E4 - Biodiversity and ecosystems Impact, risk and opportunity management E4-2 – Policies related to biodiversity and ecosystems
  1. The undertaking shall describe its adopted policies to manage its material impacts, risks, dependencies, and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of its material biodiversity and ecosystem- related impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 20 shall contain the information on the policies the undertaking has in place to manage its material impacts, risks, dependencies and opportunities related to biodiversity and ecosystems in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters).

  4. In addition to the provisions of ESRS 2 MDR-P the undertaking shall describe whether and how its biodiversity and ecosystems-related policies:
    1. relate to the matters specified in ESRS E4 AR 4;
    2. relate to its material biodiversity and ecosystems-related impacts;
    3. relate to material dependencies and material physical and transition risks and opportunities;
    4. support traceability of products, components and raw materials with material actual or potential impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems along the value chain;
    5. address production, sourcing or consumption from ecosystems that are managed to maintain or enhance conditions for biodiversity, as demonstrated by regular monitoring and reporting of biodiversity status and gains or losses; and
    6. address social consequences of biodiversity and ecosystems-related impacts.

  5. The undertaking shall specifically disclose whether it has adopted:
    1. biodiversity and ecosystem protection policy covering operational sites owned, leased, or managed in or near a biodiversity sensitive area;
    2. sustainable land / agriculture practices or policies[1];
    3. sustainable oceans / seas practices or policies[2]; and
    4. policies to address deforestation[3].

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #11 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies without sustainable land/agriculture practices”).

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #12 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies without sustainable oceans/seas practices”).

[3] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #15 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Deforestation”).

 

Application Requirements

AR 11. The policies described under this Disclosure Requirement may be integrated in broader environmental or sustainability policies covering different subtopics.

AR 12. The undertaking may also provide information on how the policy refers to the production, sourcing or consumption of raw materials, and in particular how it:

  1. limits procurement from suppliers that cannot demonstrate that they are not contributing to significant damage to protected areas or key biodiversity areas (e.g., through certification);
  2. refers to recognised standards or third-party certifications overseen by regulators; and
  3. addresses raw materials originating from ecosystems that have been managed to maintain or enhance conditions for biodiversity, as demonstrated by regular monitoring and reporting of biodiversity status and gains or losses.

AR 13. The undertaking may disclose connections and alignment with other global goals and agreements such as the SDGs 2, 6, 14 and 15 or any other well established global convention related to biodiversity and ecosystems.

AR 14. When disclosing policies related to social consequences of biodiversity and ecosystems related dependencies and impacts under 23 (f), the undertaking may notably refer to the Nagoya Protocol and the Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD).

AR 15. When disclosing information about whether and how its policies address the social consequences of biodiversity and ecosystems-related impacts under paragraph 23(f), the undertaking may provide information in relation to:

  1. the fair and equitable sharing of the benefits arising from the utilisation of genetic resources; and
  2. the free, prior and informed consent for access to genetic resources.

AR 16. The undertaking may also explain how its policy enables it to:

  1. avoid negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems in its own operations and related upstream and downstream value chain;
  2. reduce and minimise its negative impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems in its operations and throughout the upstream and downstream value chain that cannot be avoided;
  3. restore and rehabilitate degraded ecosystems or restore cleared ecosystems following exposure to impacts that cannot be completely avoided and/or minimised; and
  4. mitigate its contribution to material biodiversity loss

AR 17. When disclosing its policies, if referring to third-party standards of conduct, the undertaking may disclose whether the standard used:

  1. is objective and achievable based on a scientific approach to identifying issues, and realistic in assessing how these issues can be addressed on the ground under a variety of practical circumstances;
  2. is developed or maintained through a process of ongoing consultation with stakeholders with balanced input from all relevant stakeholder groups, including producers, traders, processors, financiers, local people and communities, indigenous peoples, and civil society organisations representing consumer, environmental and social interests, with no group holding undue authority or veto power over the content;
  3. encourages a step-wise approach and continuous improvement, both in the standard and its application of better management practices, and requires the establishment of meaningful targets and specific milestones to indicate progress against principles and criteria over time;
  4. is verifiable through independent certifying or verifying bodies, which have defined and rigorous assessment procedures that avoid conflicts of interest, and are compliant with ISO guidance on accreditation and verification procedures or Article 5(2) of Regulation (EC) No 765/2008; and
  5. conforms to the ISEAL Code of Good Practice.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E4.pdf None None MDR-P
42 E4 - Biodiversity and ecosystems Impact, risk and opportunity management E4-3 – Action plans and resources in relation to biodiversity and ecosystems
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its biodiversity and ecosystems-related actions and the resources allocated to their implementation.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the key actions taken and planned that significantly contribute to the achievement of biodiversity and ecosystems-related policy objectives and targets.

  3. The description of key actions and resources shall follow the mandatory content defined in ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters.

  4. In addition, the undertaking :
    1. may disclose how it has applied the mitigation hierarchy with regard to its actions (avoidance, minimisation, restoration/rehabilitation, and compensation or offsets);
    2. shall disclose whether it used biodiversity offsets in its action plans. If the actions contain biodiversity offsets, the undertaking shall include the following information:
      1. the aim of the offset and key performance indicators used;
      2. the financing effects (direct and indirect costs) of biodiversity offsets in monetary terms; and;
      3. a description of offsets including area, type, the quality criteria applied and the standards that the biodiversity offsets comply with;
    3. shall describe whether and how it has incorporated local and indigenous knowledge and nature- based solutions into biodiversity and ecosystems-related actions.

Application Requirements

AR 18. The undertaking may relate significant monetary amounts of CapEx and OpEx required to implement the actions taken or planned to: 

  1. the relevant line items or notes in the financial statements;
  2. the key performance indicators required under article 8 of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and under Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178; and
  3. if applicable, the CapEx plan required by Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2021/2178.

AR 19. The undertaking may disclose whether it considers an “avoidance” action plan, which prevents damaging actions before they take place. Avoidance often involves a decision to deviate from the business-as-usual project development path. An example of avoidance is altering the biodiversity and ecosystem footprint of a project to avoid destruction of natural habitat on the site and/or establishing set-asides where priority biodiversity values are present and will be conserved. At a minimum, avoidance should be considered where there are biodiversity and ecosystem-related values that are in one of the following categories: particularly vulnerable and irreplaceable, of particular concern to stakeholders, or where a cautious approach is warranted due to uncertainty about impact assessment or about the efficacy of management measures. The three main types of avoidance are defined below:

  1. avoidance through site selection (Locate the entire project away from areas recognised for important biodiversity values);
  2. avoidance through project design (Configure infrastructure to preserve areas at the project site with important biodiversity values); and
  3. avoidance through scheduling (Time project activities to account for patterns of species behaviour (e.g., breeding, migration) or ecosystem functions (e.g., river dynamics).

AR 20. With regard to key actions, the undertaking may disclose:

  1. a list of key stakeholders involved (e.g., competitors, suppliers, retailers, other business partners, affected communities and authorities, government agencies) and how they are involved, mentioning key stakeholders negatively or positively impacted by actions and how they are impacted, including impacts or benefits created for affected communities, smallholders, indigenous peoples or other persons in vulnerable situations;
  2. where applicable, an explanation of the need for appropriate consultations and the need to respect the decisions of affected communities;
  3. a brief assessment of whether the key actions may induce significant negative sustainability impacts;
  4. an explanation of whether the key action is intended to be a one-time initiative or systematic practice;
  5. an explanation of whether the key action plan is carried out only by the undertaking, using the undertaking’s resources, or whether it is part of a wider initiative to which the undertaking significantly contributes. If the key action plan is part of a wider initiative, the undertaking may provide more information on the project, its sponsors and other participants;
  6. a description of how it contributes to systemwide change, notably to alter the drivers of biodiversity and ecosystem change, e.g., through technological, economic, institutional, and social factors and changes in underlying values and behaviours; 

AR 21. In the context of this Disclosure Requirement, “local and indigenous knowledge” refer to  the understandings, skills and philosophies developed by societies with long histories of interaction with their natural surroundings. For rural and indigenous peoples, local knowledge informs decision-making about fundamental aspects of day-to-day life.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E4.pdf None None MDR-A
43 E4 - Biodiversity and ecosystems Metrics and targets E4-4 – Targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the biodiversity and ecosystem-related targets it has set.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to allow an understanding of the targets the undertaking has adopted to support its biodiversity and ecosystems policies and address its material related impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities.

  3. The description of the targets shall follow the mandatory content defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets.

  4. The disclosure required by paragraph 29 shall include the following information:
    1. whether ecological thresholds and allocations of impacts to the undertaking were applied when setting If so, the undertaking shall specify:
      1. the ecological thresholds identified and the methodology used to identify such thresholds;
      2. whether or not the thresholds are entity-specific and if so, how they were determined; and
      3. how responsibility for respecting identified ecological thresholds is allocated in the undertaking;
    2. whether the targets are informed by, and/or aligned with the Kunming-Montreal Global Biodiversity Framework, relevant aspects of the EU Biodiversity Strategy for 2030 and other biodiversity and ecosystem-related national policies and legislation;
    3. how the targets relate to the biodiversity and ecosystem impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities identified by the undertaking in relation to its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain;
    4. the geographical scope of the targets, if relevant;
    5. whether or not the undertaking used biodiversity offsets in setting its targets; and
    6. to which of the layers of the mitigation hierarchy the target can be allocated (i.e., avoidance, minimisation, restoration and rehabilitation, compensation or offsets).

 

Application Requirements

AR 22. The undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related to the Substantial Contribution criteria for Biodiversity as defined in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Where the Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria  for Biodiversity as defined in  delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 10(3), Article 11(3), Article 12(2), Article 13(2), and Article 14(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 are not met, the undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related those DNSH criteria.

AR 23. When disclosing information required under paragraph 29 for the purpose of setting targets the undertaking shall consider the need for an informed and willing consent of local and indigenous peoples, the need for appropriate consultations and the need to respect the decisions of these communities.

AR 24. The targets related to material impacts may be presented in a table as illustrated below:

Type of target according to mitigation hierarchy

Baseline value and base year

 

Target  value and geographical scope

Connected policy or if legislation relevant 

2025

2030

Up to 2050

 

Avoidance

 

 

 

 

 

Minimisation

 

 

 

 

 

Rehabilitation and restoration

 

 

 

 

 

Compensation or offsets

 

 

 

 

 

AR 25. The targets related to the potentially material sustainability matters listed in paragraph AR 4 of this Standard, may be presented in a table as illustrated below:

Type of target according to sustainability matter

Baseline value and base year

Target value and geographical scope

Connected policy or legislation    if relevant

2025

2030

Up to 2050

 

 

 

 

 

 

AR 26. Measurable targets related to biodiversity and ecosystems may be expressed as:

  1. size and location of all habitat areas protected or restored, whether directly or indirectly controlled by the undertaking, and whether the success of the restoration measure was or is approved by independent external professionals;
  2. recreated surfaces (environments in which management initiatives are implemented so as to create a habitat on a site where it did not exist initially); or
  3. number or percentage of projects / sites whose ecological integrity was improved (e.g., installation of fish passes, wildlife corridors).
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E4.pdf None None MDR-T
44 E4 - Biodiversity and ecosystems Metrics and targets E4-5 – Impact metrics related to biodiversity and ecosystems change
  1. The undertaking shall report metrics related to its material impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the performance of the undertaking against impacts identified as material in the materiality assessment on biodiversity and ecosystems.

  3. If the undertaking identified sites located in or near biodiversity-sensitive areas that it is negatively affecting (see paragraph 19(a)), the undertaking shall disclose the number and area (in hectares) of sites owned, leased or managed in or near these protected areas or key biodiversity and ecosystems change.

  4. If the undertaking has identified material impacts with regards to land-use change, or impacts on the extent and condition of ecosystems, it may also disclose their land-use based on a Life Cycle Assessment.

  5. For datapoints specified in paragraphs 38 to 41, the undertaking shall consider its own operations.

  6. If the undertaking has concluded that it directly contributes to the impact drivers of land-use change, freshwater-use change and/or sea-use change, it shall report relevant The undertaking may disclose metrics that measure:
    1. the conversion over time (e.g. 1 or 5 years) of land cover (e.g. deforestation or mining);
    2. changes over time (e.g. 1 or 5 years) in the management of the ecosystem (e.g., through the intensification of agricultural management, or the application of better management practices or forestry harvesting);
    3. changes in the spatial configuration of the landscape (e.g. fragmentation of habitats, changes in ecosystem connectivity);
    4. changes in ecosystem structural connectivity (e.g. habitat permeability based on physical features and arrangements of habitat patches); and
    5. the functional connectivity (e.g. how well genes or individuals move through land, freshwater and seascape).

  7. If the undertaking concluded that it directly contributes to the accidental or voluntary introduction of invasive alien species, the undertaking may disclose the metrics it uses to manage pathways of introduction and spread of invasive alien species and the risks posed by invasive alien species.

  8. If the undertaking identified material impacts related to the state of species, the undertaking may report metrics it considers relevant. The undertaking may:
    1. refer to relevant disclosure requirements in ESRS E1, ESRS E2, ESRS E3, and ESRS E5;
    2. consider population size, range within specific ecosystems as well as extinction risk. These aspects provide insight on the health of a single species’ population and its relative resilience to human induced and naturally occurring change;
    3. disclose metrics that measure changes in the number of individuals of a species within a specific area;
    4. disclose metrics on species at extinction risk[1] that measure:
      1. the threat status of species and how activities/pressures may affect the threat status; or
      2. changes in the relevant habitat for a threatened species as a proxy for the undertaking’s impact on the local population’s extinction risk.
  1. If the undertaking identified material impacts related to ecosystems, it may disclose:
    1. with regard to ecosystems extent, metrics that measure area coverage of a particular ecosystem without necessarily considering the quality of the area being assessed, such as habitat For example, forest cover is a measure of the extent of a particular ecosystem type, without factoring in the condition of the ecosystem (e.g., provides the area without describing the species diversity within the forest).
    2. with regard to ecosystems condition:
      1. metrics that measure the quality of ecosystems relative to a pre-determined reference state;
      2. metrics that measure multiple species within an ecosystem rather than the number of individuals within a single species within an ecosystem (for example: scientifically established species richness and abundance indicators that measure the development of (native) species composition within an ecosystem against the reference state at the beginning of the first reporting period as well as the targeted state outlined in the Kunming-Montreal  Global Biodiversity Framework, or an aggregation of species’ conservation status if relevant); or iii. metrics that reflect structural components of condition such as habitat connectivity (i.e., how linked habitats are to each other).

[1] As indicated in the IUCN Red List of Threatened Species and the European Red List published by the European Commission. 

 

Application Requirements

AR 27. When preparing the information required under this Disclosure Requirement, the undertaking shall consider and may describe:

  1. the methodologies and metrics used and an explanation for why these methodologies and metrics are selected, as well as their assumptions, limitations and uncertainties, and any changes in methodologies made over time and why they occurred;
  2. the scope of the metrics and methodologies, for example:
    1. undertaking, site, brand, commodity, corporate business unit, activity;
    2.  aspects (as set out in paragraph AR 4) covered.
  3. the biodiversity components of the metrics: species specific, ecosystem specific;
  4. the geographies covered by the methodology and an explanation of why any relevant geographies were omitted;
  5. how the metrics integrate ecological thresholds (e.g., the biosphere integrity and land-system change, planetary boundaries) and allocations;
  6. the frequency of monitoring, key metrics being monitored, and the baseline condition/value and baseline year/period, as well as the reference period;
  7. whether these metrics rely on primary data, secondary data, modelled data or on expert judgement, or a mixture of these;
  8. an indication of which action is measured and monitored via the metrics and how they relate to the achievement of targets;
  9. whether metrics are mandatory (required by legislation) or voluntary. If they are mandatory, the undertaking may indicate the relevant legislation; if voluntary, the undertaking may refer to any voluntary standard or procedure used; and
  10. whether the metrics are informed by or correspond to expectations or recommendations of relevant and authoritative national, EU-level or intergovernmental guidelines, policies, legislation or agreements, such as the Convention for Biological Diversity (CBD) or IPBES.

AR 28. The undertaking shall disclose metrics that are verifiable and that are technically and scientifically robust considering the appropriate time scales geographies, and may disclose how its selected metrics correspond to those criteria. To ensure that the metric is relevant there should be a clear relationship between the indicator and the purpose of the measurement. Uncertainties should be reduced as far as possible. Data or mechanisms used should be supported by well-established organisations and updated over time. Robust modelled data and expert judgment can be used where data gaps exist. The methodology shall be sufficiently detailed to allow for meaningful comparison of impacts and mitigation activities over time. Information gathering processes and definitions must be systematically applied. This enables a meaningful review of the undertaking’s performance over time and helps internal and peer comparison.

AR 29. If a metric corresponds to a target, the baseline for both shall be aligned. The biodiversity baseline is an essential component of the larger biodiversity and ecosystems management process. The baseline is necessary to inform impact assessment and management planning, as well as monitoring and adaptive management.

AR 30. Methodologies available to collect data and measure the undertakings’ impacts on biodiversity and ecosystems may be separated into three categories as follows:

  1. primary data: collected in-situ using on the ground surveys;
  2. secondary data: including geospatial data layers that are overlaid with geographic location data of business activities.
    1. At the species level, data layers on the ranges of different species can be used to predict the species that may be present at different locations. This includes operation sites and sourcing locations. Different range layers will have different levels of accuracy depending on certain factors (e.g., whether species ranges have been refined based on availability of habitat). Information on the threat status of the species, and the activities that threaten them, can provide an indication of the likely contribution that business activities may be having on driving population trends and threat status.
    2. At the ecosystem level, data layers reflecting change in the extent and condition of ecosystems can be applied, including levels of habitat fragmentation and connectivity.
  3. modelled biodiversity state data: Model-based approaches are commonly used for measuring ecosystem level indicators (e.g., extent, condition, or function). Models quantify how the magnitude of different pressures affects the state of biodiversity. These are referred to as pressure-state relationships and are based on globally collected data. Modelling results are applied locally to estimate how undertaking-level pressures will cause changes in ecosystem condition. An impact driver generally has three main characteristics: magnitude (e.g., amount of contaminant, noise intensity), spatial extent (e.g., area of land contaminated) and temporal extent (duration of persistence of contaminant).

AR 31. With regard to life cycle assessment for land-use, the undertaking may refer to the “Land-use related environmental indicators for Life Cycle Assessment” by the Joint Research Center.

AR 32. With regard to the introduction of invasive alien species, the undertaking may disclose the pathways and number of invasive alien species and the extent of surface covered by invasive alien species.

AR 33. With regard to metrics on the extent and condition of ecosystems, useful guidance can be found in the work of the United Nations System of Environmental Economic Accounting Ecosystem Accounting (UN SEEA EA).

AR 34. The undertaking may disclose in units of area (e.g., m2 or ha) on land-use using guidance provided by the Eco-Management and Audit Scheme (EMAS)[1]:

  1. total use of land;
  2. total sealed area;
  3. total nature-oriented area on site; and (d) total nature-oriented area off site.

AR 35. The undertaking may disclose, for example, land cover change, which is the physical representation of the drivers “habitat modification” and “industrial and domestic activities”, i.e., the man-made or natural change of the physical properties of the earth’s surface at a specific location.

AR 36. Land cover is a typical variable that can be assessed with earth observation data. 

AR 37. When reporting on material impacts related to the ecosystems, the undertaking may, in addition to the extent and condition of ecosystems, also consider the functioning of ecosystems by using:

  1. a metric that measures a process or function that the ecosystem completes, or that reflects the ability of the ecosystem to undertake that specific process or function: e.g., net primary productivity, which is a measure of plant productivity based on the rate at which energy is stored by plants and made  available to other species in the ecosystem. It is a core process that occurs for ecosystems to function. It is related to many factors, such as species diversity, but does not measure these factors directly; or
  2. A metric that measures changes to the population of scientifically identified species under threat.

AR 38. At the ecosystem level, data layers reflecting change in the extent and condition of ecosystems may be applied, including levels of habitat fragmentation and connectivity.

 

[1] As proposed by Commission Regulation (EU) 2018/ 2026 of 19 December 2018 amending Annex IV to Regulation (EC) No 1221/2009 of the European Parliament and of the Council on the voluntary participation by organisations in a Community ecomanagement and audit scheme (EMAS) (OJ L 325, 20.12.2018, p. 18). 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E4.pdf None None None
45 E4 - Biodiversity and ecosystems Metrics and targets E4-6 – Anticipated financial effects from biodiversity and ecosystem-related impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its anticipated financial effects of material biodiversity- and ecosystem-related risks and opportunities.

  2. The information required by paragraph 42 is in addition to the information on current financial effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows for the reporting period required under ESRS 2 SBM-3 para 48 (d).

  3. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
    1. anticipated financial effects due to material risks arising from biodiversity- and ecosystem-related impacts and dependencies and how these risks have (or could reasonably be expected to have) a material influence on the undertaking’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows over the short-, medium- and long-term; and
    2. anticipated financial effects due to material opportunities related to biodiversity- and ecosystem.

  4. The disclosure shall include:
    1. a quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms before considering biodiversity and ecosystems-related actions or where not possible without undue cost or effort, qualitative information. For financial effects arising from material opportunities, a quantification is not required if it would result in disclosure that does not meet the qualitative characteristics of information (see ESRS 1 Appendix B Qualitative characteristics of information). The quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms may be a single amount or a range;
    2. a description of the effects considered, the impacts and dependencies to which they relate and the time horizons in which they are likely to materialise; and
    3. the critical assumptions used to quantify the anticipated financial effects as well as the sources and the level of uncertainty of those assumptions.

 

Application Requirements

AR 39. The undertaking may include an assessment of its related products and services at risk over the short-, medium- and long-term, explaining how these are defined, how financial amounts are estimated, and which critical assumptions are made.

AR 40. The quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms under paragraph 45(a) may be a single amount or a range.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E4.pdf None None None
46 E5 - Resource use and circular economy Impact, risk and opportunity management E5 related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material resource use and circular economy-related impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall describe the process to identify material impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy, in particular regarding resource inflows, resource outflows and waste, and shall provide information on:
  1. whether the undertaking has screened its assets and activities in order to identify its actual and potential impacts, risks and opportunities in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, and if so, the methodologies, assumptions and tools used in the screening;
  2. whether and how the undertaking has conducted consultations, in particular, with affected communities.

 

Application Requirements

AR 1When conducting a materiality assessment on environmental subtopics, the undertaking shall assess the materiality of resource use and circular economy in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, and may consider the four phases below, also known as the LEAP approach:

  1. Phase 1: locate where in the undertaking’s own operations and along its upstream and downstream  value chain the interface with nature takes place;
  2. Phase 2: evaluate the dependencies and impacts;
  3. Phase 3: assess the material risks and opportunities;
  4. Phase 4: prepare and report the results of the materiality assessment.

AR 2. With regard to ESRS E5, phases 1 and 2 rely mainly on the materiality assessments conducted under ESRS E1 (including energy consumption), ESRS E2 (pollution), ESRS E3 (marine resources, water consumption) and ESRS E4 (biodiversity, ecosystems, raw materials). Indeed, circular economy eventually aims at reducing the environmental impact of the use of products, materials and other resources, minimizing waste and the release of hazardous substances and hence at reducing impacts on nature. This application requirement focuses mainly on the third phase of this LEAP approach, while the fourth phase addresses the outcome of the process. 

AR 3. The process to assess the materiality of impacts, dependencies, risks and opportunities shall consider the provisions in ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities and IRO-2 Disclosure Requirements in ESRS covered by the undertaking’s sustainability statement.

AR 4. The sub-topics related to resource use and circular economy covered by the materiality assessment include:

  1. resource inflows including the circularity of material resource inflows, considering resource use optimisation, intensity of materials and products and renewable and non-renewable resources;
  2. resource outflows related to products and services; and
  3. waste, including hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste management.

AR 5. In Phase 3, to assess its material risks and opportunities based on the results of Phases 1 and 2, the undertaking may:

  1. identify transition risks and opportunities in its own operations and its upstream and downstream value chain, including the risk of staying in a business-as-usual scenario:
    1. policy and legal, e.g., bans on the extraction and use of non-renewable resources, regulations on waste treatment;
    2. technology, e.g., introduction on the market of new technologies to replace existing use of products and materials;
    3. market, e.g., shifting supply, demand and financing;
    4. reputation, e.g. changing societal, customer or community perceptions.
  2. identify physical risks including depletion of stock and use of virgin and non-virgin renewable resources, and of non-renewable resources;
  3. identify opportunities categorised by:
    1. resource efficiency: e.g., transition to more efficient services and processes requiring less resources, eco-design for longevity, repair, reuse, recycle, by- products, take-back systems, decoupling activity from extraction of materials, intensifying circular material use, creation of a system that allows for dematerialization (e.g., digitisation, improving utilisation rates, weight reduction); practices to ensure products and materials are collected, sorted, and reused, repaired, refurbished, remanufactured;
    2. markets: e.g., demand for less resource-intense products and services, and new consumption models such as product-as- a-service, pay-per-use, sharing, leasing;
    3. financing: e.g., access to green funds, bonds or loans;
    4. resilience: e.g., diversification of resources and business activities (e.g., start a new business unit to recycle new materials), investing in green infrastructures, adopting recycling and circularity mechanisms that reduce the dependencies, capability of the undertaking to safeguard future stocks and flows of resources; and
    5. reputation.

AR 6. The undertaking may consider the following methodologies to assess its impacts, risks and opportunities in its own operations and along its upstream and downstream value chain

  1. Commission Recommendation 2021/2279 on the use of the Environmental Footprint methods to measure and communicate the life cycle environmental performance of products and organizations (Annex I – Product Environmental Footprint; Annex III – Organisation Environmental Footprint); and 
  2. Material Flow Analysis (MFA) from the European Environment Agency.

AR 7. When providing information on the outcome of the materiality assessment, the undertaking shall consider:

  1. a list of business units associated to resource use and circular economy material impacts, risks and opportunities in the context of the products and services of the undertaking and the waste it generates;
  2. a list and prioritisation of the material resources used by the undertaking;
  3. the material impacts and risks of staying in business as usual;
  4. the material opportunities related to a circular economy;
  5. the material impacts and risks of a transition to a circular economy; and
  6. the stages of the value chain where resource use, risks and negative impacts are concentrated.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E5.pdf None None None
47 E5 - Resource use and circular economy Impact, risk and opportunity management E5-1 – Policies related to resource use and circular economy
  1. The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 12 shall contain the information on the policies the undertaking has in place to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to resource use and circular economy in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters.

  4. In the summary, the undertaking shall indicate whether and how its policies address the following matters where material:
    1. transitioning away from use of virgin resources, including relative increases in use of secondary (recycled) resources;
    2. sustainable sourcing and use of renewable resources.

  5. Policies shall address material impacts, risks and opportunities in its own operations and along its upstream and downstream value chain.

Application Requirements

AR 8. The policies described under this Disclosure Requirement may be integrated in broader environmental or sustainability policies covering different subtopics.

AR 9. When providing information on its policies, the undertaking shall consider whether and how its policies address:

  1. the waste hierarchy: (a) prevention; (b) preparing for re-use; (c) recycling; (d) other recovery, e.g., energy recovery; and (e) disposal. In this context, the waste treatment cannot be considered as a recovery;
  2. the prioritisation of the avoidance or minimisation waste (Re-use, Repair, Refurbish, Remanufacture and Repurpose) over waste treatment (Recycling). The concepts of eco-design[1], waste as a resource or post- consumer waste (at the end of a consumer-product lifecycle), should also be taken into consideration.

AR 10. When defining its policies, the undertaking may consider the Paper on “Categorisation system for the circular economy”, which describes circular design and production models, circular use models, circular value recovery models and circular support along the principles of the nine circular economy “R” strategies or principles: refuse, rethink, reduce, re-use, repair, refurbish, remanufacture, repurpose and recycle.

[1] As established by Directive 2009/125/EC.Directive 2009/125/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 21 October 2009 establishing a framework for the setting of ecodesign requirements for energy-related products (OJ L 285, 31.10.2009, p. 10). 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E5.pdf None None MDR-P
48 E5 - Resource use and circular economy Impact, risk and opportunity management E5-2 – Actions and resources in relation to resource use and circular economy
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its resource use and circular economy actions and the resources allocated to their implementation.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the key actions taken and planned to achieve the resource use and circular economy-related policy objectives and targets.

  3. The description of the resource use and circular economy-related actions and resources allocated shall follow the principles defined in ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters.
  4. In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-A, the undertaking may specify whether and how an action and resources cover:
    1. higher levels of resource efficiency in use of technical and biological materials and water, particularly in relation to critical raw materials and rare earths as listed in the Raw Materials Information System;
    2. higher rates of use of secondary raw materials (recyclates);
    3. application of circular design, leading to increased product durability and optimisation of use, and higher rates of: Reuse, Repair, Refurbishing, Remanufacture, Repurposing and Recycling.
    4. application of circular business practices such as (i) value retention actions (maintenance, repair, refurbishing, remanufacturing, component harvesting, upgrading and reverse logistics, closed loop systems, second-hand retailing), (ii) value maximisation actions (product-service systems, collaborative and sharing economy business models), (iii) end-of-life actions (recycling, upcycling, extended producer responsibility), and (iv) systems efficiency actions (industrial symbiosis);
    5. actions taken to prevent waste generation in the undertaking’s upstream and downstream value chain; and
    6. optimistation of waste management in line with the waste hierarchy.

Application Requirements

AR 11. When providing information under paragraph 17 and considering that resources are shared and that circular economy strategies may require collective actions, the undertaking may specify the actions taken to engage with its upstream and downstream value chain and/or its local network on the development of collaborations or initiatives increasing the circularity of products and materials.

AR 12. In particular, the undertaking may specify the following:

  1. how it contributes to circular economy, including for instance smart waste collection systems;
  2. the other stakeholders involved in the collective actions: competitors, suppliers, retailers, customers, other business partners, local communities and authorities, government agencies;
  3. a description of the organisation of the collaboration or initiative, including the specific contribution of the undertaking and the roles of the different stakeholders in the project.

AR 13. The actions may cover the undertaking’s own operations and/or its upstream and downstream value chain.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E5.pdf None None MDR-A
49 E5 - Resource use and circular economy Metrics and targets E5-3 – Targets related to resource use and circular economy
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the resource use and circular economy-related targets it has set.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the targets the undertaking has adopted to support its resource use and circular economy policy and to address its material impacts, risks and opportunities.

  3. The description of the targets shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets.

  4. The disclosure required by paragraph 21 shall indicate whether and how the undertaking’s targets relate to resource inflows and resource outflows, including waste and products and materials, and, more specifically to:
    1. the increase of circular product design (including for instance design for durability, dismantling, reparability, recyclability etc);
    2. the increase of circular material use rate;
    3. the minimisation of primary raw material;
    4. sustainable sourcing and use (in line with the cascading principle) of renewable resources;
    5. the waste management, including preparation for proper treatment; and (f) other matters related to resource use or circular economy.

  5. The undertaking shall specify to which layer of the waste hierarchy the target relates.

  6. In addition to ESRS 2 MDR-T, the undertaking may specify whether ecological thresholds and entity-specific allocations were taken into consideration when setting targets. If so, the undertaking may specify:
    1. the ecological thresholds identified, and the methodology used to identify such thresholds;
    2. whether or not the thresholds are entity-specific and if so, how they were determined; and
    3. how responsibility for respecting identified ecological thresholds is allocated in the undertaking.

  7. The undertaking shall specify as part of the contextual information, whether the targets it has set and presented are mandatory (required by legislation) or voluntary.

Application Requirements

AR 14. If the undertaking refers to ecological thresholds to set targets, it may refer to the guidance provided by the Science-Based Targets Initiative for Nature (SBTN) in its interim guidance (Initial Guidance for Business, September 2020) or any other guidance with a scientifically acknowledged methodology that allows to set science-based targets by identifying ecological thresholds and, if applicable, organisation-specific allocations. Ecological thresholds can be local, national and/or global.

AR 15. When providing information on targets, the undertaking shall prioritise targets in absolute value.

AR 16. When providing information targets according to paragraph 24, the undertaking shall consider the production phase, the use phase, and the end of functional life of products and materials. 

AR 17. When providing information on targets related to virgin renewable raw material under paragraph 24(c), the undertaking shall consider how those targets may impact biodiversity loss, also in light of ESRS E4.

AR 18. The undertaking may disclose other targets under paragraph 24(f) including in relation to sustainable sourcing. If so, the undertaking shall explain the definition of sustainable sourcing it has adopted and how it relates to the objective set out in paragraph 22.

AR 19. The targets may cover the undertaking’s own operations and/or its upstream and downstream value chain.

AR 20. The undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related to the Substantial Contribution criteria for Circular Economy as defined in the delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 13(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852. Where the Do No Significant Harm (DNSH) criteria  for Circular Economy as defined in  delegated acts adopted pursuant to Article 10(3), Article 11(3), Article 12(2), Article 14(2), and Article 15(2) of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 are not met, the undertaking may specify whether the target addresses shortcomings related those DNSH criteria. 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E5.pdf None None MDR-T
50 E5 - Resource use and circular economy Metrics and targets E5-4 – Resource inflows
  1. The undertaking shall disclose information on its resource inflows related to its material impacts, risks and opportunities.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the resource use in the undertaking’s own operations and its upstream value chain.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 28 shall include a description of its resource inflows where material: products (including packaging) and materials (specifying critical raw materials and rare earths), water and property, plant and equipment used in the undertaking’s own operations and along its upstream value chain.

  4. When an undertaking assesses that resource inflows is a material sustainability matter, it shall disclose the following information about the materials used to manufacture the undertaking’s products and services during the reporting period, in tonnes or kilogrammes:
    1. the overall total weight of products and technical and biological materials used during the reporting period;
    2. the percentage of biological materials (and biofuels used for non-energy purposes) used to manufacture the undertaking’s products and services (including packaging) that is sustainably sourced, with the information on the certification scheme used and on the application of the cascading principle; and
    3. the weight in both absolute value and percentage, of secondary reused or recycled components, secondary intermediary products and secondary materials used to manufacture the undertaking’s products and services (including packaging).

  5. The undertaking shall provide information on the methodologies used to calculate the data. It shall specify whether the data is sourced from direct measurement or estimations, and disclose the key assumptions used. 

Application Requirements

AR 21. Resource inflows may cover the following categories: IT equipment, textiles, furniture, buildings, heavy machinery, mid-weight machinery, light machinery, heavy transport, midweight transport, light transport and warehousing equipment. With regard to materials, resource inflow indicators include raw materials, associated process materials, and semi-manufactured goods or parts.

AR 22. When the undertaking is subject to paragraph 31, it may also provide transparency on the materials that are sourced from by-products/waste stream (e.g., offcuts of a material that has not previously been in a product).

AR 23. The denominator of the percentage indicator required under paragraphs 31(b) and 31(c) is the overall total weight of materials used during the reporting period.

AR 24. The reported usage data are to reflect the material in its original state, and not to be presented with further data manipulation, such as reporting it as “dry weight”.

AR 25. In cases where there is an overlap between categories of reused, recycled, the undertaking shall specify how double counting was avoided and the choices that were made.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E5.pdf None None None
51 E5 - Resource use and circular economy Metrics and targets E5-5 – Resource outflows
  1. The undertaking shall disclose information on its resource outflows, including waste, related to its material impacts, risks and opportunities.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
    1. how the undertaking contributes to the circular economy by i) designing products and materials in line with circular economy principles and ii) increasing or maximising the extent to which products, materials and waste processing are recirculated in practice after first use; and
    2. the undertaking’s waste reduction and waste management strategy, the extent to which the undertaking knows how its pre-consumer waste is managed in its own activities.

Products and materials

  1. The undertaking shall provide a description of the key products and materials that come out of the undertaking’s production process and that are designed along circular principles, including durability, reusability, repairability, disassembly, remanufacturing, refurbishment, recycling, recirculation by the biological cycle, or optimisation of the use of the product or material through other circular business models.

  2. Undertakings for which outflows are material shall disclose:
    1. The expected durability of the products placed on the market by the undertaking, in relation to the industry average for each product group;
    2. The reparability products, using an established rating system, where possible;
    3. The rates of recyclable content in products and their packaging.

Waste

  1. The undertaking shall disclose the following information on its total amount of waste from its own operations, in tonnes or kilogrammes:
    1. the total amount of waste generated ;
    2. the total amount by weight diverted from disposal, with a breakdown between hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste and a breakdown by the following recovery operation types:
      1. preparation for reuse;
      2. recycling; and
      3. other recovery operations.
    3. the amount by weight directed to disposal by waste treatment type and the total amount summing all three types, with a breakdown between hazardous waste and non-hazardous waste. The waste treatment types to be disclosed are: i. incineration; ii. landfill; and iii. other disposal operations;
    4. the total amount and percentage of non-recycled waste[1].
  1. When disclosing the composition of the waste, the undertaking shall specify:
    1. the waste streams relevant to its sector or activities (e.g. tailings for the undertaking in the mining sector, electronic waste for the undertaking in the consumer electronics sector, or food waste for the undertaking in the agriculture or in the hospitality sector); and;
    2. the materials that are present in the waste (e.g. biomass, metals, non-metallic minerals, plastics, textiles, critical raw materials and rare earths).
  2. The undertaking shall also disclose the total amount of hazardous waste and radioactive waste generated by the undertaking, where radioactive waste is defined in Article 3(7) of Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom[2].

  3. The undertaking shall provide contextual information on the methodologies used to calculate the data and in particular the criteria and assumptions used to determine and classify products designed along circular principles under paragraph 35. It shall specify whether the data is sourced from direct measurement or estimations; and disclose the key assumptions used.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #13 in Table II of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Non-recycled waste ratio”).

[2] Council Directive 2011/70/Euratom of 19 July 2011 establishing a Community framework for the responsible and safe management of spent fuel and radioactive waste (OJ L 199, 2.8.2011, p. 48). This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #9 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Hazardous waste and radioactive waste ratio”).

Application Requirements

AR 26. Products and materials information to be provided under paragraph 35 refers to all materials and products that come out of the undertaking’s production process and that a company puts on the market (including packaging).

AR 27. When compiling the rate, the undertaking shall use as denominator the overall total weight of materials used during the reporting period.

AR 28. The undertaking may disclose its engagement in product end-of-life waste management, for example through extended producer responsibility schemes or take-back schemes.

AR 29. Type of waste is to be understood as hazardous waste or non-hazardous waste. Some specific waste, such as radioactive waste, may also be presented as a separate type.

AR 30. When considering the waste streams relevant to its sectors or activities, the undertaking may consider the list of waste descriptions from the European Waste Catalogue.

AR 31. Examples of other types of recovery operations under paragraph 37(b)iii may be found in Annex II of Directive 2008/98/EC (Waste Framework Directive).

AR 32. Examples of other types of disposal operations under paragraph 37(c)iii may be found in Annex I of Directive 2008/98/EC (Waste Framework Directive).

AR 33. When providing contextual information under paragraph 40 the undertaking may:

  1. explain the reasons for high weights of waste directed to disposal (e.g., local regulations that prohibit landfill of specific types of waste);
  2. describe sector practices, sector standards, or external regulations that mandate a specific disposal operation; and
  3. specify whether the data has been modelled or sourced from direct measurements, such as waste transfer notes from contracted waste collectors.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E5.pdf None None None
52 E5 - Resource use and circular economy Metrics and targets E5-6 – Anticipated financial effects from resource use and circular economy-related impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the anticipated financial effects of material risks and opportunities arising from resource use and circular economy-related impacts.

  2. The information required by paragraph 41 is in addition the information on current financial effects on the entity’s financial position, financial performance and cash flows for the reporting period required under ESRS 2 SBM-3 para 48 (d). The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of:
    1. anticipated financial effects due to material risks arising from material resource use and circular economy-related impacts and dependencies and how these risks have or could reasonably be expected to have) a material influence on the undertaking’s financial position, financial performance, and cash flows over the short-, medium- and long-term; and
    2. anticipated financial effects due to material opportunities related to resource use and circular economy.
  1. The disclosure shall include:
    1. a quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms before considering resource use and circular economy-related actions, or where not possible without undue cost or effort, qualitative information. For financial effects arising from material opportunities, a quantification is not required if it would result in disclosure that does not meet the qualitative characteristics of information (see ESRS 1 Appendix B Qualitative characteristics of information);
    2. a description of the effects considered, the impacts and dependencies to which they relate and the time horizons in which they are likely to materialize;
    3. the critical assumptions used to quantify the anticipated financial effects, as well as the sources and level of uncertainty of those assumptions.

 

Application Requirements

AR 34. When providing information under paragraph 42(b), the undertaking may illustrate and describe how it intends to strengthen value retention.

AR 35. The undertaking may include an assessment of its related products and services at risk over the short-, medium- and long-term, explaining how these are defined, how financial amounts are estimated, and which critical assumptions are made.

AR 36. The quantification of the anticipated financial effects in monetary terms under paragraph 43(a) may be a range.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20E5.pdf None None None
53 S1 - Own workforce Strategy S1 related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
  1. When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-2, the undertaking shall disclose how the interests, views, and rights of people in its own workforce, including respect for their human rights, inform its strategy and business model. The undertaking’s own workforce is a key group of affected stakeholders.

Application Requirements

AR 4. ESRS 2 SBM-2 requires the undertaking to provide an understanding of whether and how it considers the role that its strategy and business model may play in creating, exacerbating or mitigating significant material impacts on its own workforce, and whether and how the business model and strategy are adapted to address such material impacts.

AR 5. While the undertaking’s own workforce may not be engaging with the undertaking at the level of its strategy or business model, their views can inform the undertaking’s assessment of its strategy and business model. The undertaking shall consider the views of workers’ representatives when applicable to fulfil this disclosure.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None false
54 S1 - Own workforce Strategy S1 related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
  1. When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose:
    1. whether and how actual and potential impacts on its own workforce as identified in ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities: (i) originate from or are connected to the undertaking’s strategy and business models, and (ii) inform and contribute to adapting the undertaking’s strategy and business model; and
    2. the relationship between its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on own workforce and its strategy and business model.

  2. When fulfilling the requirements of paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose whether all people in its own workforce who could be materially impacted by the undertaking are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2. These material impacts shall include impacts that are connected with the undertaking’s own operations and its value chain, including through its products or services, as well as through its business relationships. In addition, the undertaking shall provide the following information:
    1. a brief description of the types of employees and non-employees in its own workforce subject to material impacts by its operations, and specify whether they are employees, self- employed people, or people provided by third party undertakings primarily engaged in employment activities;
    2. in the case of material negative impacts, whether they are either (i) widespread or systemic in contexts where the undertaking operates (for example, child labour or forced labour or compulsory labour in specific countries or regions outside the EU), or (ii) related to individual incidents (for example, an industrial accident or an oil spill);
    3. in the case of material positive impacts, a brief description of the activities that result in the positive impacts, the types of employees and non-employees in its own workforce that are positively affected or could be positively affected; the undertaking may also disclose whether the positive impacts occur in specific countries or regions;
    4. any material risks and opportunities for the undertaking arising from impacts and dependencies on its own workforce;
    5. any material impacts on its own workforce that may arise from transition plans for reducing negative impacts on the environment and achieving greener and climate- neutral operations, including information on the impacts on own workforce caused by the undertaking’s plans and actions to reduce carbon emissions in line with international agreements. Impacts, risks and opportunities include restructuring and employment loss as well as opportunities arising from job creation and reskilling or upskilling;
    6. operations at significant risk of incidents of forced labour or compulsory labour[1] either in terms of:
      1. type of operation (such as manufacturing plant); or ii. countries or geographic areas with operations considered at risk;
    7. operations at significant risk of incidents of child labour[2] either in terms of:
      1. type of operation (such as manufacturing plant); or
      2. countries or geographic areas with operations considered at risk.
  1. In describing the main types of people in its own workforce who are or could be negatively affected, based on the materiality assessment set out in ESRS 2 IRO 1, the undertaking shall disclose whether and how it has developed an understanding of how people with particular characteristics, those working in particular contexts, or those undertaking particular activities may be at greater risk of harm.

  2. The undertaking shall disclose which, if any, of its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on people in its own workforce relate to specific groups of people (for example, particular age groups, or people working in a particular factory or country) rather than to all of its own workforce (for example, a general pay cut, or training offered to all people in its own workforce).

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from additional indicators related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #13 in Table III of

Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Operations and suppliers at significant risk of incidents of forced or compulsory labour”).

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from additional indicators related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #12 in Table III of

Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Operations and suppliers at significant risk of incidents of child labour”).

Application Requirements

AR 6. Impacts on the undertaking’s own workforce can originate in its strategy or business model in a number of different ways. For example, impacts may relate to the undertaking’s value proposition (such as providing lowest cost products or services, or high-speed delivery, in ways that put pressure on labour rights in its own operations), or its cost structure and the revenue model (such as shifting inventory risk to suppliers, with knock-on effects on the labour rights of people who work for them).

AR 7. Impacts on the undertaking’s own workforce that originate in the strategy or business model can also bring material risks to the undertaking. For example, risks arise if some people in the workforce are at risk of forced labour, and the undertaking is importing products into countries where the law allows for the confiscation of imported goods that are suspected of being made with forced labour. An example of opportunities for the undertaking may result from providing opportunities for the workforce such as job creation and upskilling in the context of a “just transition”. Another example, in the context of a pandemic or other severe health crisis, relates to the undertaking potentially relying on contingent labour with little to no access to sick care and health benefits that may face severe operational and business continuity risks as workers have no choice but to keep working while sick, further exacerbating the spread of the disease and causing major supply chain breakdowns. Reputational and business opportunity risks linked to the exploitation of low-skilled, low-paid workers in sourcing geographies with minimal protections for them are also increasing with media backlash and consumer preferences moving to more ethically sourced or sustainable goods.

AR 8. Examples of particular characteristics of people in the undertaking’s own workforce that may be considered by the undertaking when responding to paragraph 15 relate to young people that may be more susceptible to impacts on their physical and mental development, or women in a context where women are routinely discriminated against in the terms and conditions of work, or migrants in a context where the market for the supply of labour is poorly regulated and workers are routinely charged recruitment fees. For some people in the workforce, the inherent nature of the activity that they are required to undertake may put them at risk (for example, people required to handle chemicals or operate certain equipment or low paid employees who are on “zero hours” contracts).

AR 9. With regard to paragraph 16, material risks could also arise because of the undertaking’s dependency on its own workforce where low-likelihood but high-impact events may trigger financial effects; for example, where a global pandemic leads to severe health impacts on the undertaking’s workforce resulting in major disruptions to production and distribution. Other examples of risk related to the undertaking’s dependency on its workforce include a shortage in skilled workers or political decisions or legislation affecting its own operations and own workforce.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
55 S1 - Own workforce Impact, risk and opportunity management S1-1 – Policies related to own workforce
  1. The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts on its own workforce, as well as associated material risks and opportunities.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of material impacts on the undertaking’s own workforce specifically, as well as policies that cover material impacts, risks and opportunities related to its own workforce.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 17 shall contain the information on the undertaking’s policies to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to its own workforce in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. In addition, the undertaking shall specify if such policies cover specific groups within its own workforce or all of its own workforce.

  4. The undertaking shall describe its human rights policy commitments[1] that are relevant to its own workforce, including those processes and mechanisms to monitor compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises[2]. In its disclosure it shall focus on those matters that are material in relation to, as well as its general approach to:
    1. respect for the human rights, including labour rights, of people in its own workforce;
    2. engagement with people in its own workforce; and
    3. measures to provide and/or enable remedy for human rights impacts.

  5. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how its policies with regard to its own workforce are aligned with relevant internationally recognised instruments, including the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights[3].

  6. The undertaking shall state whether its policies in relation to its own workforce explicitly address trafficking in human beings99, forced labour or compulsory labour and child labour.

  7. The undertaking shall state whether it has a workplace accident prevention policy or management system[4].

  8. The undertaking shall disclose:
    1. whether it has specific policies aimed at the elimination of discrimination, including harassment, promoting equal opportunities and other ways to advance diversity and inclusion;
    2. whether the following grounds for discrimination are specifically covered in the policy: racial and ethnic origin, colour, sex, sexual orientation, gender identity, disability, age, religion, political opinion, national extraction or social origin, or other forms of discrimination covered by Union regulation and national law;
    3. whether the undertaking has specific policy commitments related to inclusion or positive action for people from groups at particular risk of vulnerability in its own workforce and, if so, what these commitments are; and
    4. whether and how these policies are implemented through specific procedures to ensure discrimination is prevented, mitigated and acted upon once detected, as well as to advance diversity and inclusion in general.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #9 in Table III of

Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of a human rights policy”).

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table I of Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments.

[3] This information supports the needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to companies without due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organisation Conventions 1 to 8” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II. 99 This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table III of Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings”).

[4] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impact as set out by indicator #1 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Investments in companies without workplace accident prevention policies”).

Application Requirements

AR 10. The undertaking shall consider whether explanations of significant changes to the policies adopted during the reporting year (for example, new expectations for foreign subsidiaries, new or additional approaches to due diligence and remedy) provide contextual information for users and may disclose such explanations. This includes policies and commitments of the undertaking to prevent or mitigate the risks and negative impacts on people in its own workforce of reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to greener and climate-neutral operations as well as to provide opportunities for the workforce such as job creation and upskilling, including explicit commitments to a ‘just transition’.

AR 11. The policy may take the form of a stand-alone policy regarding the undertaking’s own workforce or be included in a broader document such as a code of ethics or a general sustainability policy that has already been disclosed by the undertaking as part of another ESRS. In those cases, the undertaking shall provide an accurate cross-reference to identify the aspects of the policy that satisfy the requirements of this Disclosure Requirement.

AR 12. When disclosing the alignment of its policies with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the undertaking shall consider that the Guiding Principles refer to the International Bill of Human Rights, which consist of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the two Covenants that implement it, as well as the International Labour Organisation’s Declaration on Fundamental Rights and Principles at Work and the core conventions that underpin it, and may report on alignment with these instruments.

AR 13. When explaining how external-facing policies are embedded, the undertaking may, for example, consider internal policies of responsible sourcing, and alignment with other policies relevant to own workers, for example, regarding forced labour. With regard to supplier codes of conduct that the undertaking may have, it shall indicate whether they include provisions addressing the safety of workers, precarious work (i.e., use of workers on short-term or limited hours contracts, workers employed via third parties, sub-contracting to third parties or use of informal workers), human trafficking, the use of forced labour or child labour, and whether such provisions are fully in line with applicable ILO standards. 

AR 14. The undertaking may provide an illustration of the types of communication of its policies to those individuals, group of individuals or entities for whom they are relevant, either because they are expected to implement them (for example, the undertaking’s employees, contractors and suppliers), or because they have a direct interest in their implementation (for example, people in its own workforce, investors). It may disclose communication tools and channels (for example, flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face to face interactions, workers’ representatives), aimed at ensuring that the policy is accessible and that different audiences understand its implications. The undertaking may also explain how it identifies and removes potential barriers for dissemination, such as through translation into relevant languages or the use of graphic depictions.

AR 15. Discrimination in employment and occupation occurs when someone is treated differently or less favourably because of characteristics that are not related to merit or the inherent requirements of the job. These characteristics are commonly defined in national laws. Besides the grounds mentioned in the Disclosure Requirement, the undertaking shall consider other grounds for discrimination prohibited under national legislation.

AR 16. Discrimination can arise in a variety of work-related activities. These include access to employment, particular occupations, training and vocational guidance and social security. Moreover, it can occur with respect to the terms and conditions of employment, such as: recruitment, remuneration, hours of work and rest, paid holidays, maternity protection, security of tenure, job assignments, performance assessment and advancement, training opportunities, promotion prospects, occupational safety and health, termination of employment. The undertaking may address these areas specifically when disclosing its policies and underlying procedures to fulfil the disclosure requirement.

AR 17. The undertaking may disclose whether it:

  1. has policies and procedures which make qualifications, skills and experience the basis for the recruitment, placement, training and advancement at all levels, while accounting for the fact that some individuals may have more difficulty than others to acquire such qualifications, skills and experience;
  2. assigns responsibility at top management level for equal treatment and opportunities in employment, issue clear company-wide policies and procedures to guide equal employment practices, and link advancement to desired performance in this area;
  3. provides staff training on non-discrimination policies and practices, with a particular focus on middle and upper management to raise awareness and address resolution strategies for preventing and addressing systemic and incidental discrimination;
  4. makes adjustments to the physical environment to ensure health and safety for workers, customers and other visitors with disabilities;
  5. evaluates whether job requirements have been defined in a way that could systematically disadvantage certain groups;
  6. keeps up-to-date records on recruitment, training and promotion that provide a transparent view of opportunities for employees and their progression within the undertaking;
  7. puts in place grievance procedures to address complaints, handle appeals and provide recourse for employees (especially in the context of negotiations and collective agreements) when discrimination is identified, and is alert to formal structures and informal cultural issues that can prevent employees from raising concerns and grievances; and (h) has programs to promote access to skills development. 
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None MDR-P
56 S1 - Own workforce Impact, risk and opportunity management S1-2 – Processes for engaging with own workers and workers’ representatives about impacts
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its general processes for engaging with people in its own workforce and workers' representatives about actual and potential impacts on its own workforce.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of how the undertaking engages, as part of its ongoing due diligence process, with people in its own workforce and workers' representatives about material, actual and potential, positive and/or negative impacts that do or are likely to affect them, and whether and how perspectives of its own workforces are taken into account in the decision-making processes of the undertaking.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how the perspectives of its own workforce inform its decisions or activities aimed at managing the actual and potential impacts on its own workforce. This shall include, where relevant, an explanation of:
    1. whether engagement occurs directly with the undertaking’s own workforce or workers' representatives;
    2. the stage(s) at which engagement occurs, the type of engagement and frequency of the engagement;
    3. the function and the most senior role within the undertaking that has operational responsibility for ensuring that this engagement happens and that the results inform the undertaking’s approach;
    4. where applicable, a Global Framework Agreement or other agreements that the undertaking has with workers' representatives related to the respect of human rights of its own workforce, including an explanation of how the agreement enables the undertaking to gain insight into the perspectives of its own workforce; and
    5. where applicable, how the undertaking assesses the effectiveness of its engagement with its own workforce, including, where relevant, any agreements or outcomes that result.

  4. Where applicable, the undertaking shall disclose the steps it takes to gain insight into the perspectives of people in its own workforce who may be particularly vulnerable to impacts and/or marginalised (for example, women, migrants, people with disabilities).

  5. If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a general process to engage with its own workforce, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a process in place.

Application Requirements

AR 18. When describing what function or role has operational responsibility for such engagement and/or ultimate accountability, the undertaking may disclose whether this is a dedicated role or function or part of a broader role or function, and whether any capacity building activities have been offered to support the staff to undertake engagement. If it cannot identify such a position or function, it may state that this is the case. This disclosure could also be fulfilled by making reference to information disclosed according to ESRS 2 GOV-1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies.

AR 19. When preparing the disclosures described in paragraph 27 b) and c), the following illustrations may be considered:

  1. examples of stages at which engagement occurs are i) determining the approach to mitigation and ii) evaluating the effectiveness of mitigation;
  2. for type of engagement, these could be participation, consultation and/or information;
  3. for the frequency of the engagement, information may be provided on whether engagement occurs on a regular basis, at certain points in a project or business process, (for example, when a new harvest season begins or a new production line is opened), as well as whether it occurs in response to legal requirements and/or in response to stakeholder requests and whether the result of the engagement is being integrated into the undertaking's decision-making processes; and
  4. for the role with operational responsibility, whether the undertaking requires relevant staff to have certain skills, or whether it provides training or capacity building to relevant staff to undertake engagement.

AR 20. Global Framework Agreements (GFA) serve to establish an ongoing relationship between a multinational enterprise and a Global Union Federation to ensure that the undertaking adheres to the same standards in every country in which it operates.

AR 21. To illustrate how the perspectives of its own workforce have informed specific decisions or activities, the undertaking may provide examples from the current reporting period.

AR 22. Where the undertaking has agreements with national, European or international trade unions or works councils related to the rights of people its own workforce, this can be disclosed to illustrate how the agreement enables the undertaking to gain insight into the perspectives of such people.

AR 23. Where possible, the undertaking may disclose examples from the reporting period to illustrate how the perspectives of its own workforce and workers' representatives have informed specific decisions or activities of the undertaking.

AR 24. The undertaking shall consider the following aspects when fulfilling this Disclosure Requirement:

  1. The type of engagement (for example, information, consultation or participation) and its frequency (for example, ongoing, quarterly, annually);
  2. how feedback is recorded and integrated into decision-making, and how people in the workforce are informed about the way in which their feedback has influenced decisions;
  3. whether engagement activities take place at the organisational level or at a lower level, such as at the site or project level, and in the latter case, how information from engagement activities is centralised;
  4. the resources (for example, financial or human resources) allocated to engagement; and
  5. how it engages with people in its workforce and workers’ representatives on the impacts on its own workforce that may arise from reducing carbon emissions and transitioning to greener and climate-neutral operations, in particular restructuring, employment loss or creation, training and up/reskilling, gender and social equity, and health and safety.

AR 25. The undertaking may also disclose the following information in relation to paragraph 24 on diversity:

  1. how it engages with at-risk or persons in vulnerable situations (for example whether it takes specific approaches and gives special attention to potential barriers);
  2. how it takes into account potential barriers to engagement with people in its workforce (for example, language and cultural differences, gender and power imbalances, divisions within a community or group);
  3. how it provides people in its workforce with information that is understandable and accessible through appropriate communication channels;
  4. any conflicting interests that have arisen among its workforce and how the undertaking has resolved these conflicting interests; and
  5. how it seeks to respect the human rights of all stakeholders engaged, for example, their rights to privacy, freedom of expression, and peaceful assembly and protest.

AR 26. The undertaking may also report information about the effectiveness of processes for engaging with its own workforce from previous reporting periods. This applies in cases where the undertaking has assessed the effectiveness of these processes or derived lessons during the current reporting period. Processes used to track effectiveness can include internal or external auditing or verification, impact assessments, measurement systems, stakeholder feedback, grievance mechanisms, external performance ratings, and benchmarking.  

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
57 S1 - Own workforce Impact, risk and opportunity management S1-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for own workers to raise concerns
  1. The undertaking shall describe the processes it has in place to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts on people in its own workforce that the undertaking is connected with, as well as channels available to its own workforce to raise concerns and have them addressed.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the formal means by which the undertaking’s own workforce can make their concerns and needs known directly to the undertaking and/or through which the undertaking supports the availability of such channels (for example, grievance mechanisms) in the workplace, and how follow up is carried out with the people concerned regarding the issues raised and the effectiveness of these channels.

  3. The undertaking shall describe the processes in place to cover the matters defined within paragraph 2 of the Objective section by disclosing the following information:
    1. its general approach to and processes for providing or contributing to remedy where it has caused or contributed to a material negative impact on people in its own workforce, including whether and how the undertaking assesses that the remedy provided is effective;
    2. any specific channels it has in place for its own workforce to raise their concerns or needs directly with the undertaking and have them addressed, including whether these are established by the undertaking itself and/or through participation in third-party mechanisms;
    3. whether or not the undertaking has a grievance/complaints handling mechanism related to employee matters[1]; and
    4. the processes through which the undertaking supports the availability of such channels in the workplace of its own workforce; and
    5. how it tracks and monitors issues raised and addressed, and, how it ensures the effectiveness of the channels, including through the involvement of stakeholders who are intended users.
  1. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it assesses that people in its own workforce are aware of, and trust, these structures or processes as a way to raise their concerns or needs and have them addressed. In addition, the undertaking shall disclose whether it has policies in place regarding the protection of individuals that use them, including workers’ representatives, against retaliation. If such information has been disclosed in accordance with ESRS G1-1, the undertaking may refer to that information.

  2. If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a channel for raising concerns and/or does not support the availability of such a channel in the workplace for its own workforce, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a channel in place.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #5 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of grievance/complaints handling mechanisms related to employee matters).

Application Requirements

AR 27. In fulfilling the requirements set out by the disclosure criteria of Disclosure Requirement ESRS S1-3, the undertaking may be guided by the content of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Due Diligence Guidance for Responsible Business Conduct focused on remediation and grievance mechanisms.

AR 28. Channels for raising concerns or needs include grievance mechanisms, hotlines, trade unions (where people in the workforce are unionised), works councils, dialogue processes or other means through which the undertaking’s own workforce or workers’ representatives can raise concerns about impacts or explain needs that they would like the undertaking to address. This could include both channels provided by the undertaking directly and channels provided by the entities where their own workforce is working, in addition to any other mechanisms an undertaking may use to gain insight into the management of impacts on its own workforce, such as compliance audits. Where the undertaking is relying solely on information about the existence of such channels provided by its business relationships to answer this requirement, it may state that.

AR 29. Third party mechanisms could include those operated by the government, NGOs, industry associations and other collaborative initiatives. The undertaking may disclose whether these are accessible to all of its own workforce (or workers’ representatives or, in their absence, individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of negative impacts).

AR 30. The undertaking shall consider whether and how people in its own workforce that may be affected and their workers' representatives are able to access channels at the level of the undertaking they are employed by, or contracted to work for, in relation to each material impact. Relevant channels may include hotlines, trade unions (where people in the workforce are unionised) or works councils, or other grievance mechanisms operated by the relevant undertaking or by a third party.

AR 31. In explaining whether and how the undertaking knows that people in its own workforce are aware of and trust any of these channels, the undertaking may provide relevant and reliable data about the effectiveness of these channels from the perspective of the people concerned. Examples of sources of information are surveys of people in the undertaking’s workforce that have used such channels and their levels of satisfaction with the process and outcomes.

AR 32. In describing the effectiveness of channels for its own workforce and workers’ representatives to raise concerns, the undertaking may be guided by the following questions, based on the “effectiveness criteria for non-judicial grievance mechanisms”, as laid out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, in particular principle 31. The considerations below may be applied to individual channels or to a collective system of channels:

  1. do the channels have legitimacy by providing appropriate accountability for their fair conduct and building stakeholder trust?
  2. are the channels known and accessible to stakeholders?
  3. do the channels have clear and known procedures, with indicative timeframes?
  4. do the channels ensure reasonable access for stakeholders to sources of information, advice and expertise?
  5. do the channels offer transparency by providing sufficient information both to complainants and, where applicable, to meet any public interest?
  6. do outcomes achieved through the channels accord with internationally recognised human rights?
  7. does the undertaking identify insights from the channels that support continuous learning in both improving the channels and preventing future impacts?
  8. does the undertaking focus on dialogue with complainants as the means to reach agreed solutions, rather than seeking to unilaterally determine the outcome?
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
58 S1 - Own workforce Impact, risk and opportunity management S1-4 – Taking action on material impacts on own workforce, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to own workforce, and effectiveness of those actions
  1. The undertaking shall disclose how it takes action to address material negative and positive impacts, and to manage material risks and pursue material opportunities related to its own workforce, and the effectiveness of those actions.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is twofold. Firstly, it is to enable an understanding of any actions and initiatives through which the undertaking seeks to:
    1. to prevent, mitigate and remediate negative material impacts on its own workforce; and/or
    2. to achieve positive material impacts for its own workforce.

Secondly, it is to enable an understanding of the ways in which the undertaking is addressing the material risks and pursuing the material opportunities related to its own workforce.

  1. The undertaking shall provide a summarised description of the action plans and resources to manage its material impacts, risks, and opportunities related to its own workforce in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters.

  2. In relation to the material impacts related to its own workforce, the undertaking shall describe:
    1. actions taken, planned or underway to prevent or mitigate material negative impacts on its own workforce;
    2. whether and how it has taken action to provide or enable remedy in relation to an actual material impact;
    3. any additional actions or initiatives it has in place with the primary purpose of delivering positive impacts for its own workforce; and
    4. how it tracks and assesses the effectiveness of these actions and initiatives in delivering outcomes for its own workforce.

  3. In relation to paragraph 36, the undertaking shall describe the processes through which it identifies what action is needed and appropriate in response to a particular actual or potential negative impact on its own workforce.

  4. In relation to material risks and opportunities, the undertaking shall describe:
    1. what action is planned or underway to mitigate material risks for the undertaking arising from its impacts and dependencies on its own workforce and how it tracks effectiveness in practice; and
    2. what action is planned or underway to pursue material opportunities for the undertaking in relation to its own workforce.

  5. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it ensures that its own practices do not cause or contribute to material negative impacts on own workforce, including, where relevant, its practices in relation to procurement, sales and data use. This may include disclosing what approach is taken when tensions arise between the prevention or mitigation of material negative impacts and other business pressures.

  6. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 40, the undertaking shall consider ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets if it evaluates the effectiveness of an action by setting a target.  

  7. The undertaking shall disclose what resources are allocated to the management of its material impacts, with information that allows users to gain an understanding of how the material impacts are managed.

Application Requirements

AR 33. It may take time to understand negative impacts and how the undertaking may be involved with them through its own workforce, as well as to identify appropriate responses and put them into practice). Therefore, the undertaking may disclose:

  1. its general and specific approaches to addressing material negative impacts;
  2. its initiatives aimed at contributing to additional material positive impacts;
  3. how far it has progressed in its efforts during the reporting period; and (d) its aims for continued improvement.

AR 34. Appropriate action can vary according to whether the undertaking causes or contributes to a material impact, or whether it is involved because the impact is directly linked to its operations, products or services by a business relationship.

AR 35. Given that material negative impacts affecting its own workforce that have occurred during the reporting period may also be connected with other entities or operations outside its direct control, the undertaking may disclose whether and how it seeks to use its leverage in its business relationships to manage those impacts. This may include using commercial leverage (for example, enforcing contractual requirements with business relationships or implementing incentives), other forms of leverage within the relationship (such as providing training or capacity-building on workers’ rights to entities with which the undertaking has a business relationship) or collaborative leverage with peers or other actors (such as initiatives aimed at responsible recruitment or ensuring workers receive an adequate wage).

AR 36. When the undertaking discloses its participation in an industry or multi-stakeholder initiative as part of its actions to address material negative impacts, the undertaking may disclose how the initiative, and its own involvement, is aiming to address the material impact concerned. It may report under ESRS S1-5 the relevant targets set by the initiative and progress towards them.

AR 37. When disclosing whether and how the undertaking considers actual and potential impacts on its own workforce in decisions to terminate business relationships and whether and how it seeks to address any negative impacts that may result from termination, the undertaking may include examples.

AR 38. Processes used to track the effectiveness of actions can include internal or external auditing or verification, court proceedings and/or related court decisions, impact assessments, measurement systems, stakeholder feedback, grievance mechanisms, external performance ratings, and benchmarking.

AR 39. Reporting on effectiveness is aimed at enabling the understanding of the links between actions taken by an undertaking and the effective management of impacts. Additional information that the undertaking may provide includes data showing a decrease in the number of incidents identified.

AR 40. With regard to initiatives or processes whose primary aim is to deliver positive impacts for people in the undertaking’s own workforce that are based on their needs, and with regard to progress in the implementation of such initiatives or processes, the undertaking may disclose:

  1. information about whether and how people in its own workforce and workers’ representatives play a role in decisions regarding the design and implementation of these programmes or processes; and
  2. information about the intended or achieved positive outcomes for the undertaking’s own workforce of these programmes or processes.

AR 41. The undertaking may explain whether any such initiatives are designed also to support the achievement of one or more Sustainable Development Goals. For example, an undertaking committing to SDG 8 to “promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all” may be actively working towards eliminating forced labour or compulsory labour or supporting higher levels of productivity on activities in developing countries through technological upgrades and training of local labour, which can benefit both the specific people in its own workforce targeted by the actions, and also their local communities.

AR 42. When disclosing the intended or achieved positive outcomes of its actions for the undertaking’s own workforce, a distinction is to be made between evidence of certain activities having occurred (for example, that x number of people have received financial literacy training) from evidence of actual outcomes for the people concerned (for example, that x people report that they are able to better manage their pay and their household budgets).

AR 43. If the undertaking has taken measures to mitigate negative impacts on its own workforce that arise from the transition to a greener, climate-neutral economy, such as training and reskilling, employment guarantees, and in the case of downscaling or mass dismissal, measures such as job counselling, coaching, intra-company placements and early retirement plans, the undertaking shall disclose those measures. This includes measures to comply with prevailing regulation. The undertaking may highlight present and/or expected external developments that influence whether dependencies turn into risks. This includes consideration of impacts that may arise from the transition to greener and climate-neutral operations.

AR 44. When disclosing the material risks and opportunities related to its impacts or dependencies on its own workforce, the undertaking may consider the following:

  1. risks related to the undertaking’s impacts on its own workforce may include the reputational or legal exposure where people in the undertaking’s workforce are found to be subject to forced labour or child labour;
  2. risks related to the undertaking’s dependencies on its own workforce may include disruption of business operations where significant employee turnover or lack of skills/training development threaten the undertaking’s business; and
  3. opportunities related to the undertaking’s impacts on its own workforce may include market differentiation and greater customer appeal from guaranteeing decent pay and conditions for non-employees.

AR 45. When explaining whether dependencies turn into risks, the undertaking shall consider external developments.

AR 46. When disclosing policies, actions and resources and targets related to the management of material risks and opportunities, in cases where risks and opportunities arise from a material impact, the undertaking may cross-reference its disclosures on policies, actions and resources and targets in relation to that impact.

AR 47. The undertaking shall consider whether and how its process(es) to manage material risks related to own workforce are integrated into its existing risk management process(es).

AR 48. When disclosing the resources allocated to the management of material impacts, the undertaking may explain which internal functions are involved in managing the impacts and what types of action they take to address negative and advance positive impacts.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None MDR-A
59 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the time-bound and outcome-oriented targets it may have set related to:
    1. reducing negative impacts on its own workforce; and/or
    2. advancing positive impacts on its own workforce; and/or
    3. managing material risks and opportunities related to its own workforce.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking is using outcome-oriented targets to drive and measure its progress in addressing its material negative impacts and/or advancing positive impacts on its own workforce, and/or in managing material risks and opportunities related to its own workforce.

  3. The summarised description of the targets set to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to the undertaking’s own workforce shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose the process for setting the targets, including whether and how the undertaking engaged directly with its own workforce or workers’ representatives in:
    1. setting any such targets;
    2. tracking the undertaking’s performance against them; and
    3. identifying any lessons or improvements as a result of the undertaking’s performance. 

Application Requirements

AR 49. When disclosing information about targets in accordance with paragraph 46, the undertaking may disclose:

  1. the intended outcomes to be achieved in the lives of a certain number of people in its own workforce;
  2. the stability of the targets over time in terms of definitions and methodologies to enable comparability over time; and/or
  3. the standards or commitments which the targets are based on (for instance codes of conduct, sourcing policies, global frameworks, or industry codes).

AR 50. Targets related to risks and opportunities may be the same as or distinct from targets related to impacts. For example, a target to reach adequate wages for non-employees could both reduce impacts on those people and reduce associated risks in terms of the quality and reliability of their output.

AR 51. The undertaking may also distinguish between short-, medium- and long-term targets covering the same policy commitment. For example, the undertaking may have a long-term target to achieve an 80% reduction in health and safety incidents affecting its delivery drivers by 2030 and a near-term target to reduce the overtime hours of delivery drivers by x% while maintaining their income by 2024.

AR 52. When modifying or replacing a target in the reporting period, the undertaking may explain the change by cross-referencing it to significant changes in the business model or to broader changes in the accepted standard or legislation from which the target is derived to provide contextual information as per ESRS 2 BP-2 Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances.  

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None MDR-T
60 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-6 – Characteristics of the undertaking’s employees
  1. The undertaking shall describe key characteristics of employees in its own workforce.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide insight into the undertaking’s approach to employment, including the scope and nature of impacts arising from its employment practices, to provide contextual information that aids an understanding of the information reported in other disclosures, and to serve as the basis for calculation for quantitative metrics to be disclosed under other disclosure requirements in this Standard.

  3. In addition to the information required by paragraph 40(a)iii of ESRS 2 General Disclosures, the undertaking shall disclose:
    1. the total number of employees by head count, and breakdowns by gender and by country for countries in which the undertaking has 50 or more employees representing at least 10% of its total number of employees;
    2. the total number by head count or full time equivalent (FTE) of:
      1. permanent employees, and breakdown by gender;
      2. temporary employees, and breakdown by gender; and
      3. non-guaranteed hours employees, and breakdown by gender.
    3. the total number of employees who have left the undertaking during the reporting period and the rate of employee turnover in the reporting period.
    4. a description of the methodologies and assumptions used to compile the data, including whether the numbers are reported:
      1. in head count or full-time equivalent (FTE) (including an explanation of how FTE is defined); and
      2. at the end of the reporting period, as an average across the reporting period, or using another methodology.
    5. where applicable, a provision of contextual information necessary to understand the data (for example, to understand fluctuations in number of employees during the reporting period); and
    6. a cross-reference of the information reported under (a) above to the most representative number in the financial statements.

  4. For the information specified in point (b) of paragraph 50, the undertaking may in addition disclose the breakdown by region.

  5. The undertaking may disclose by head count or full time equivalent (FTE) the following information:
    1. full-time employees, and breakdowns by gender and by region; and (b) part-time employees, and breakdowns by gender and by region.

 

Application Requirements

AR 53. This Disclosure Requirement covers all employees who perform work for any of the undertaking’s entities included in its sustainability reporting. 

AR 54. Providing a breakdown of employees by country gives insight into the distribution of activity across countries. The number of employees in each country is also a key trigger for many information, consultation and participation rights for workers and workers' representatives, both in the Union labour law acquis (for example, Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council [1] “European Works Councils Directive” and Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council[2] “Information and Consultation Directive”) and in national law (for example, rights to establish a works council or to have board level employee representation). Providing a breakdown of employees by gender and type of employment relationship gives insight into gender representation across the undertaking. Additionally, providing a breakdown of employees by region gives insight into regional variations. A region can refer to a country or other geographic locations, such as a region within a country or a world region.

AR 55. The undertaking shall disclose the requested disclosures in the following tabular formats: Table 1: Template for presenting information on employee head count by gender

 

Gender

Number of employees (head count)

Male

 

Female

 

Other

 

Not reported

 

Total

Employees

 

In some Member States it is possible for persons to legally register themselves as having a third, often neutral, gender, which is categorised as “other” in the table above. However, if the undertaking is disclosing data about employees where this is not possible, it may explain this and indicate that the “other” category is not applicable.

Table 2: Template for presenting employee head count in countries where the undertaking has at least 50 employees representing at least 10% of its total number of employees.

 Country

Number of employees (head count)

Country A

 

Country B

 

Country C

 

Country D

 

Table 3: Template for presenting information on employees by contract type, broken down by gender (head count or FTE) (reporting on full-time and part-time employees is voluntary)

[Reporting period]

FEMALE

MALE

OTHER*

NOT

DISCLOSED

TOTAL

Number of employees (head count / FTE)

 

 

 

 

 

Number of permanent employees (head count / FTE)

 

 

 

 

 

Number of temporary employees (head count / FTE)

 

 

 

 

 

Number of non-guaranteed hours employees (head count / FTE)

              

 

 

 

 

Number of full-time employees (head count / FTE)

 

 

 

 

 

Number of part-time employees (head count / FTE)

 

 

 

 

 

* Gender as specified by the employees themselves. 

Table 4: Template for presenting information on employees by contract type, broken down by region (head count or FTE) (reporting on full-time and part-time employees is voluntary)

[Reporting period]

 

REGION A

REGION B 

TOTAL

Number of employees (head count / FTE)

 

                

 

 

Number of permanent employees (head count / FTE)

 

 

 

 

Number of temporary employees (head count / FTE)

 

 

 

Number of non-guaranteed hours employees (head count / FTE)

 

 

 

Number of full-time employees (head count / FTE)

 

 

 

Number of part-time employees (head count / FTE)

 

 

 

AR 56. The definitions of permanent, temporary, non-guaranteed hours, full-time, and part-time employees differ between countries. If the undertaking has employees in more than one country, it shall use the definitions as per the national laws of the countries where the employees are based to calculate country-level data. The country-level data shall then be added up to calculate total numbers, disregarding differences in national legal definitions. Non-guaranteed hours employees are employed by the undertaking without a guarantee of a minimum or fixed number of working hours. The employee may need to make themselves available for work as required, but the undertaking is not contractually obliged to offer the employee a minimum or fixed number of working hours per day, week, or month. Casual employees, employees with zero-hour contracts, and on-call employees are examples that fall under this category.

AR 57. Disclosing the number of employees at the end of the reporting period provides information for that point in time, without capturing fluctuations during the reporting period. Disclosing these numbers in averages across the reporting period takes into account fluctuations during the reporting period.

AR 58. Quantitative data, such as the number of temporary or part-time employees, is unlikely to be sufficient on its own. For example, a high proportion of temporary or part-time employees could indicate a lack of employment security for employees, but it could equally signal workplace flexibility when offered as a voluntary choice. For this reason, the undertaking is required to disclose contextual information to help information users interpret the data. The undertaking can explain the reasons for temporary employment. An example of such a reason is the recruitment of employees to undertake work on a temporary or seasonal project or event. Another example is the standard practice of offering a temporary contract (for example, six months) to new employees before an offer of permanent employment is made. The undertaking may also explain the reasons for nonguaranteed hours employment.   

AR 59. For the own employee turnover calculation, the undertaking shall calculate the aggregate of the number of employees who leave voluntarily or due to dismissal, retirement, or death in service. The undertaking shall use this number for the numerator of the employee turnover rate and may determine the denominator used to calculate this rate and describe its methodology.

AR 60. Where data is not available for detailed information, the undertaking shall use an estimation of the employee number or ratios, in accordance with ESRS 1, and clearly identify where the use of estimates has taken place.

[1] Directive 2009/38/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 6 May 2009 on the establishment of a European Works Council or a procedure in Community-scale undertakings and Community-scale groups of undertakings for the purposes of informing and consulting employees (OJ L 122, 16.5.2009, p. 28). 

[2] Directive 2002/14/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 March 2002 establishing a general framework for informing and consulting employees in the European Community - Joint declaration of the European Parliament, the Council and the Commission on employee representation (OJ L 80, 23.3.2002, p. 29). 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
61 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-7 – Characteristics of non-employee workers in the undertaking’s own workforce
  1. The undertaking shall describe key characteristics of non-employees in its own workforce.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide insight into the undertaking’s approach to employment, including the scope and nature of impacts arising from its employment practices, to provide contextual information that aids the understanding of the information reported in other disclosures, and to serve as the basis for calculation for quantitative metrics to be disclosed under other disclosure requirements in this Standard. It also allows an understanding of how much the undertaking relies on non-employees as part of its workforce.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 53 shall include:
    1. a disclosure of the total number of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce, i.e., either people with contracts with the undertaking to supply labour (“self-employed people”) or people provided by undertakings primarily engaged in “employment activities” (NACE Code N78).
    2. an explanation of the methodologies and assumptions used to compile the data, including whether the number of non-employees is reported:
      1. in headcount or full-time equivalent (FTE) (including a definition of how FTE is defined); and
      2. at the end of the reporting period, as an average across the reporting period, or using another methodology.
    3. where applicable, a provision of contextual information necessary to understand the data (for example, significant fluctuations in the number of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce during the reporting period and between the current and the previous reporting period).
  1. For the information specified in point (a) of paragraph 55, the undertaking may disclose the most common types of non-employees (for example, self-employed people, people provided by undertakings primarily engaged in employment activities, and other types relevant to the undertaking), their relationship with the undertaking, and the type of work that they perform.

  2. Where data is not available, the undertaking shall estimate the number and state that it has done so. When the undertaking performs estimates, it shall describe the basis of preparation of this estimation.  

Application Requirements

AR 61. This Disclosure Requirement provides insight into the undertaking’s approach to employment, as well as the scope and nature of impacts arising from its employment practices. It also provides contextual information that aids an understanding of the information reported in other disclosures. This disclosure covers both individual contractors supplying labour to the undertaking (“self-employed people”) and workers provided by undertakings primarily engaged in “employment activities” (NACE Code N78). If all the people performing work for the undertaking are employees and the undertaking does not have any people in its workforce who are not employees, this Disclosure Requirement is not material for the undertaking; notwithstanding, the undertaking may state this fact when disclosing the information required by Disclosure Requirement S1-6 as contextual information as this information can be relevant for the users of the Sustainability Statement.

AR 62. Examples of contractors (self-employed people) in the undertaking’s own workforce include: contractors hired by the undertaking to perform work that would otherwise be carried out by an employee; contractors hired by the undertaking to perform work in a public area (for example, on a road, on the street); and contractors hired by the undertaking to deliver the work/service directly at the workplace of a client of the organization. Examples of people employed by a third party engaged in ‘employment activities’ whose work is under the direction of the undertaking include: people who perform the same work that employees carry out, such as people who fill in for employees who are temporarily absent (due to illness, holiday, parental leave, etc.); people performing regular work at the same site as employees; and workers who are dispatched temporarily from another EU member state to work for the undertaking (‘posted workers’). Examples of value chain workers (and thus of workers not in the undertaking’s own workforce and reported under the scope of ESRS S2) include: workers for a supplier contracted by the undertaking who work on the supplier’s premises using the supplier’s work methods; workers for a ‘downstream’ entity which purchases goods or services from the undertaking; and workers of an equipment supplier to the undertaking who, at one or more of the undertaking’s workplaces, perform regular maintenance on the supplier’s equipment (for example, photocopier) as stipulated in the contract between the equipment supplier and the undertaking.

AR 63. If the undertaking cannot report exact figures, it shall use estimates according to the provisions in ESRS 1 to disclose the number of people in its own workforce who are not employees to the nearest ten or, where the number of people in its own workforce who are not employees is greater than 1,000, to the nearest 100, and explain this. In addition, it shall clearly identify the information that derives from actual data and estimates.

AR 64. Disclosing the number of people in the undertaking’s own workforce who are not employees at the end of the reporting period provides information for that point in time without capturing fluctuations during the reporting period. Disclosing this number as an average across the reporting period considers fluctuations during the reporting period and can provide more insightful and relevant information for users.

AR 65. The information disclosed by the undertaking allows users to understand how the number of non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce varies during the reporting period or compared to the previous reporting period (i.e., whether the numbers have increased or decreased). The undertaking may also disclose the reasons for the fluctuations. For example, an increase in the number of non-employees during the reporting period could be due to a seasonal event. Conversely, a decrease in the number of non-employees compared to the previous reporting period could be due to the completion of a temporary project. If the undertaking discloses fluctuations, it shall also explain the criteria used to determine which fluctuations it discloses. If there are no significant fluctuations in the number of non-employees during the reporting period or between the current and previous reporting period, the undertaking may disclose this information.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
62 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-8 – Collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue
  1. The undertaking shall disclose information on the extent to which the working conditions and terms of employment of its employees are determined or influenced by collective bargaining agreements and on the extent to which its employees are represented in social dialogue in the European Economic Area (EEA) at the establishment and European level.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the coverage of collective bargaining agreements and social dialogue for the undertaking’s own employees.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose:
    1. the percentage of its total employees covered by collective bargaining agreements;
    2. in the EEA, whether it has one or more collective bargaining agreements and, if so, the overall percentage of its employees covered by such agreement(s) for each country in which it has significant employment, defined as at least 50 employees by head count representing at least 10% of its total number of employees; and
    3. outside the EEA, the percentage of its own employees covered by collective bargaining agreements by region.

  4. For employees not covered by collective bargaining agreements, the undertaking may disclose whether it determines their working conditions and terms of employment based on collective bargaining agreements that cover its other employees or based on collective bargaining agreements from other undertakings.

  5. The undertaking may disclose the extent to which the working conditions and terms of employment of non-employees in its own workforce are determined or influenced by collective bargaining agreements, including an estimate of the coverage rate.

  6. The undertaking shall disclose the following information in relation to social dialogue:
    1. the global percentage of employees covered by workers’ representatives, reported at the country level for each EEA country in which the undertaking has significant employment; and
    2. the existence of any agreement with its employees for representation by a European Works Council (EWC), a Societas Europaea (SE) Works Council, or a Societas Cooperativa Europaea (SCE) Works Council.

 

Application Requirements

Collective bargaining coverage

AR 66. The percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements is calculated using the following formula:

𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑒𝑠 𝑐𝑜𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑒𝑑 𝑏𝑦 𝑐𝑜𝑙𝑙𝑒𝑐𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒 𝑏𝑎𝑟𝑔𝑎𝑖𝑛𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑎𝑔𝑟𝑒𝑒𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠
                                                                                                                                 𝑥 100
𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑒𝑠

AR 67. The employees in the undertaking’s own workforce covered by collective bargaining agreements are those individuals to whom the undertaking is obliged to apply the agreement. This means that if none of the employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement, the percentage reported is zero. An employee in the undertaking’s own workforce covered by more than one collective bargaining agreement only needs to be counted once.

AR 68. This requirement is not aimed at obtaining the percentage of employees represented by a works council or belonging to trade unions, which can be different. The percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements can be higher than the percentage of unionised employees when the collective bargaining agreements apply to both union and non-union members. Alternatively, the percentage of employees covered by collective bargaining agreements can be lower than the percentage of unionised employees. This may be the case when there are no collective bargaining agreements available or when the collective bargaining agreements do not cover all unionised employees.

Social Dialogue

AR 69. For calculating the information required by paragraph 63(a), the undertaking shall identify in which European Economic Area (EEA) countries it has significant employment (i.e., at least 50 employees representing at least 10% of its total employees). For these countries it shall report the percentage of employees in that country which are employed in establishments in which employees are represented by workers’ representatives. Establishment is defined as any place of operations where the undertaking carries out a non-transitory economic activity with human means and goods. Examples include: a factory, a branch of a retail chain, or an undertaking’s headquarters. For countries in which there is only one establishment the percentage reported shall be either 100% or 0%.

𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑒𝑠 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑖𝑛 𝑒𝑠𝑡𝑎𝑏𝑙𝑖𝑠ℎ𝑚𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑠 𝑤𝑖𝑡ℎ 𝑤𝑜𝑟𝑘𝑒𝑟𝑠′ 𝑟𝑒𝑝𝑟𝑒𝑠𝑒𝑛𝑡𝑎𝑡𝑖𝑣𝑒𝑠
                                                                                                                                  𝑥 100

𝑁𝑢𝑚𝑏𝑒𝑟 𝑜𝑓 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑒𝑠

AR 70. The information required by this Disclosure Requirement shall be reported as follows Table 1: Reporting template for collective bargaining coverage and social dialogue

 

Collective Bargaining Coverage

Social dialogue

Coverage Rate

Employees – EEA (for countries with >50 empl. representing >10% total empl.)

Employees –  Non- EEA (estimate for regions with >50 empl. representing >10% total empl)

Workplace representation (EEA only) (for countries with >50 empl. representing >10% total empl)

0-19%

 

Region A

 

 

20-39%

 

Country A

 

Region B

 

 

40-59%

Country B

 

Country A

60-79%

 

 

Country B

80-100%

 

 

 

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
63 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-9 – Diversity metrics
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the gender distribution at top management and the age distribution amongst its employees.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of gender diversity at top management level and the age distribution of its employees.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose:
    1. the gender distribution in number and percentage at top management level; and
    2. the distribution of employees by age group: under 30 years old; 30-50 years old; over 50 years old.

Application Requirements

AR 71. In preparing the disclosure on gender at top management, the undertaking shall use the definition of top management as one and two levels below the administrative and supervisory bodies unless this concept has already been defined with the undertaking’s operations and differs from the previous description. If this is the case, the undertaking can use its own definition for top management and disclose that fact and its own definition.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
64 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-10 – Adequate wages
  1. The undertaking shall disclose whether or not its employees are paid an adequate wage, and if they are not all paid an adequate wage, the countries and percentage of employees concerned.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of whether or not all the undertaking’s employees are paid an adequate wage, in line with applicable benchmarks.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose whether all its employees are paid an adequate wage, in line with applicable benchmarks. If so, stating this will be sufficient to fulfil this disclosure requirement and no further information is needed.

  4. If not all its employees are paid an adequate wage in line with applicable benchmarks, the undertaking shall disclose the countries where employees earn below the applicable adequate wage benchmark and the percentage of employees that earn below the applicable adequate wage benchmark for each of these countries.

  5. The undertaking may also disclose the information specified in this disclosure requirement with regard to non-employees in its workforce.

Application Requirements

AR 72. The lowest wage shall be calculated for the lowest pay category, excluding interns and apprentices. This is to be based on the basic wage plus any fixed additional payments that are guaranteed to all employees. The lowest wage shall be considered separately for each country in which the undertaking has operations, except outside the EEA when the relevant adequate or minimum wage is defined at a sub national level.

AR 73. The adequate wage benchmark used for comparison with the lowest wage shall not be lower than:

  1. in the EEA: the minimum wage set in accordance with Directive (EU) 2022/2041 of the European Parliament and of the Council[1] on adequate minimum wages in the European Union. In the period until Directive (EU) 2022/2041 enters into application, where there is no applicable minimum wage determined by legislation or collective bargaining in an EEA country, the undertaking shall use an adequate wage benchmark that is either not lower than the minimum wage in a neighboring country with a similar socio-economic status or not lower than a commonly-referenced international norm such as 60% of the country's median wage and 50% of the gross average wage.
  2. outside of the EEA:
    1. the wage level established in any existing international, national or sub-national legislation, official norms or collective agreements, based on an assessment of a wage level needed for a decent standard of living;
    2. if none of the instruments identified in (i) exist, any national or sub-national minimum wage established by legislation or collective bargaining; or
    3. if none of the instruments identified in (i) or (ii) exist, any benchmark that meets the criteria set out by the Sustainable Trade Initiative (IDH) (‘Roadmap on Living Wages - A Platform to Secure Living Wages in Supply Chains’), including applicable benchmarks aligned with the Anker methodology, or provided by the Wage Indicator Foundation or Fair Wage Network, provided the primacy of collective bargaining for the establishment of terms and conditions of employment is ensured.

AR 74. Directive (EU) 2022/2041 on adequate minimum wages in the European Union references both indicative reference values commonly used at international level such as 60 % of the gross median wage and 50 % of the gross average wage, and/or indicative reference values used at national level. Data for the indicative values of 60% of the national median gross wage or 50% of the national average gross wage can be obtained from the European Labour Force Survey. 

[1] Directive (EU) 2022/2041 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 19 October 2022 on adequate minimum wages in the European Union (OJ L 275, 25.10.2022, p. 33). 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
65 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-11 – Social protection
  1. The undertaking shall disclose whether its employees are covered by social protection against loss of income due to major life events, and, if not, the countries where this is not the case.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of whether the undertaking’s employees are covered by social protection against loss of income due to major life events, and, if not, the countries where this is not the case.
  1. The undertaking shall disclose whether all its employees are covered by social protection, through public programs or through benefits offered by the undertaking, against loss of income due to any of the following major life events:
    1. sickness;
    2. unemployment starting from when the own worker is working for the undertaking;
    3. employment injury and acquired disability;
    4. parental leave; and
    5. retirement

If so, stating this is sufficient to fulfil this disclosure requirement and no further information is needed.

  1. If not all of its employees are covered by social protection in accordance with paragraph 72, the undertaking shall in addition disclose the countries where employees do not have social protection with regard to one or more of the types of events listed in paragraph 72 and for each of those countries the types of employees who do not have social protection with regard to each applicable major life event.

  2. The undertaking may also disclose the information specified in this disclosure requirement with regard to non-employees in its workforce.

Application Requirements

AR 75. Social protection refers to all the measures that provide access to health care and income support in cases of challenging life events such as the loss of a job, being sick and in need of medical care, giving birth and raising a child, or retiring and in need of a pension.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
66 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-12 – Persons with disabilities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the percentage of its own employees with disabilities.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which persons with disabilities are included among the undertaking’s employees.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose the percentage of persons with disabilities amongst its employees subject to legal restrictions on the collection of data.

  4. The undertaking may disclose the percentage of employees with disabilities with a breakdown by gender.

Application Requirements

AR 76. When disclosing the information required in paragraph 77 regarding persons with disabilities, the undertaking shall provide any contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled (methodology). For example, information about the impact of different legal definitions of persons with disabilities in the different countries in which the undertaking has operations.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
67 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-13 – Training and skills development metrics
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the extent to which training and skills development is provided to its employees.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the training and skills development -related activities that have been offered to employees, within the context of continuous professional growth, to upgrade employees’ skills and facilitate continued employability.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 81 shall include:
    1. the percentage of employees that participated in regular performance and career development reviews; such information shall be broken down by gender;
    2. the average number of training hours per employee and by gender.
  1. The undertaking may disclose breakdowns by employee category for the percentage of employees that participated in regular performance and career development and for the average number of training hours per employee.

  2. The undertaking may also disclose the information specified in this disclosure requirement with regard to non-employees in its workforce.

Application Requirements

AR 77. A regular performance review is defined as a review based on criteria known to the employee and his or her superior undertaken with the knowledge of the employee at least once per year. The review can include an evaluation by the worker’s direct superior, peers, or a wider range of employees. The review can also involve the human resources department. In order to disclose the information required by paragraph 83 (a), the undertaking shall use the employee headcount figures provided in Disclosure Requirement ESRS S1-6 in the denominator to calculate the:

  1. number/proportion of performance reviews per employee; and
  2. number of reviews in proportion to the agreed number of reviews by the management.

AR 78. To disclose the average required per paragraph 83 (b), the undertaking shall perform the following calculation: total number of training hours offered to and completed by employees per gender category divided by the total number of employees per gender category. For the total training average and the average by gender, the head count figures for total employment and employment by gender reported in Disclosure Requirement ESRS S1-6 shall be used.

AR 79. Employee categories are a breakdown of employees by level (such as senior management, middle management) or function (such as technical, administrative, production). This information is derived from the undertaking’s own human resources system. In categorising the workforce, the undertaking shall define reasonable and meaningful employee categories which enable users of the information to understand different performance measures between the categories. The undertaking may present a category for executive and non- executive employees.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
68 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-14 – Health and safety metrics
  1. The undertaking shall disclose information on the extent to which its own workforce is covered by its health and safety management system and the number of incidents associated with work-related injuries, ill health and fatalities of its own workforce. In addition, it shall disclose the number of fatalities as a result of work-related injuries and work-related ill health of other workers working on the undertaking’s sites.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to allow an understanding of the coverage, quality and performance of the health and safety management system established to prevent work-related injuries.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 86 shall include the following information, where applicable broken down between employees and non-employees in the undertaking’s own workforce:
    1. the percentage of people in its own workforce who are covered by the undertaking’s health and safety management system based on legal requirements and/or recognised standards or guidelines;
    2. the number of fatalities[1] as a result of work-related injuries and work-related ill health;
    3. the number and rate of recordable work-related accidents;
    4. with regard to the undertaking’s employees, the number of cases of recordable workrelated ill health, subject to legal restrictions on the collection of data; and
    5. with regard to the undertaking’s employees, the number of days lost to work-related injuries and fatalities from work-related accidents, work-related ill health and fatalities from ill health103.

The information for (b) shall also be reported for other workers working on the undertaking’s sites, such as value chain workers if they are working on the undertaking’s sites.

  1. The undertaking may also disclose the information specified in points (d) and (e) of paragraph 88 with regard to non-employees.

  2. In addition, the undertaking may include the following additional information on the health and safety coverage: the percentage of its own workers covered by a health and safety management system which is based on legal requirements and/or recognised standards or guidelines and which has been internally audited and/or audited or certified by an external party.

[1] This information supports the information needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Weighted average ratio of accidents, injuries, fatalities” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II. This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #2 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Rate of accidents”) and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Weighted average ratio of accidents, injuries, fatalities” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II. 103 This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #3 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Number of days lost to injuries, accidents, fatalities or illness”).

 

Application Requirements

AR 80. In relation to paragraph 88 (a), the percentage of its own workforce who are covered by the undertaking’s health and safety management system shall be disclosed on a head count basis rather than a full-time equivalent basis.

AR 81. With regard to paragraph 90, when the undertaking’s health and safety management system, or certain parts thereof, has been subject to an internal audit or external certification, the undertaking may state this fact, or absence thereof, and the underlying standards for such audits/certifications, as applicable.

AR 82. Fatalities may be reported separately for those resulting from work-related injuries and those resulting from work-related ill health.

Guidance on “work-related”

AR 83. Work-related injuries and work-related ill health arise from exposure to hazards at work. Notwithstanding, other types of incidents can occur that are not connected with the work itself. For example, the following incidents are generally not considered to be work-related, unless otherwise specified in applicable national legislation:

  1. a person in the workforce suffers a heart attack while at work that it is not connected with work;
  2. a person in the workforce driving to or from work is injured in a car accident (when driving is not part of the work and where the transport has not been organised by the undertaking); and
  3. a person in the workforce with epilepsy has a seizure at work that is not connected with work.

AR 84. With regard to travelling for work purposes, injuries and ill health that occur while a person is travelling are work-related if, at the time of the injury or ill health, the person was engaged in work activities “in the interest of the employer”. Examples of such activities include travelling to and from customer contacts; conducting job tasks; and entertaining or being entertained to transact, discuss, or promote business (at the direction of the employer). If the undertaking is responsible for the transport commuting, incidents occurred while commuting are considered to be work-related. Nonetheless, incidents which arise during travel, outside of the undertaking’s responsibility (i.e., regular commuting to and from work), may be reported separately provided that the undertaking has such data available across the undertaking.

AR 85. With regard to working from home, injuries and ill health that occur when working from home are work-related, if the injury or ill health occurs while the person is performing work from home; and the injury or ill health is directly related to the performance of work rather than the general home environment or setting.

AR 86. With regard to mental illness, it is considered to be work-related, if it has been notified voluntarily by the person concerned and it is supported by an opinion from a licensed healthcare professional with appropriate training and experience; and if such opinion states that the illness is work-related.

AR 87. Health issues resulting, for example, from smoking, drug and alcohol abuse, physical inactivity, unhealthy diets, and psychosocial factors unrelated to work are not considered work-related.

AR 88. Occupational diseases are not considered work-related injuries but are covered under work-related ill health.

Guidance on computing the rate of work-related injuries

AR 89. In computing the rate of work-related injuries, the undertaking shall divide the respective number of cases by the number of total hours worked by people in its own workforce and multiplied by 1,000,000. Thereby, these rates represent the number of respective cases per one million hours worked. A rate based on 1,000,000 hours worked indicates the number of work-related injuries per 500 full time people in the workforce over a 1-year timeframe. For comparability purposes a rate based on 1,000,000 hours worked shall be used also for undertakings with less than 500 people in the workforce.

AR 90. If the undertaking cannot directly calculate the number of hours worked, it may estimate this on the basis of normal or standard hours of work, taking into account entitlements to periods of paid leave of absence from work (for example, paid vacations, paid sick leave, public holidays) and explain this in its disclosures.

AR 91. An undertaking shall include fatalities as a result of work-related injury in the calculation of the number and rate of recordable work-related injuries.

Guidance on recordable work-related ill health

AR 92. Work-related ill health can include acute, recurring, and chronic health problems caused or aggravated by work conditions or practices. These include musculoskeletal disorders, skin and respiratory diseases, malignant cancers, diseases caused by physical agents (for example, noise-induced hearing loss, vibration-caused diseases), and mental illnesses (for example, anxiety, post-traumatic stress disorder). For the purpose of the required disclosures, the undertaking shall, at a minimum, include in its disclosure those cases outlined in the ILO List of Occupational Diseases.

AR 93. In the context of this Standard, work-related musculoskeletal disorders are covered under work-related ill health (and not injuries).

AR 94. The cases to be disclosed in paragraph 88(d) relate to cases of work-related ill health notified to the undertaking or identified by the undertaking through medical surveillance, during the reporting period. The undertaking might be notified of cases of work-related ill health through reports by affected people, compensation agencies, or healthcare professionals. The disclosure may include cases of work-related ill health that were detected during the reporting period among people who were formerly in the undertaking’s workforce.

Guidance on the number of days lost

AR 95. The undertaking shall count the number of days lost such that the first full day and last day of absence shall be included. Calendar days should be considered for the calculation, thus days on which the affected individual is not scheduled for work (for example, weekends, public holidays) will count as lost days.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
69 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-15 – Work-life balance metrics
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the extent to which employees are entitled to and make use of family-related leave.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the entitlement and actual practices amongst the employees to take family-related leave in a gender equitable manner, as it is one of the dimensions of work-life balance.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 91 shall include:
    1. the percentage of employees entitled to take family-related leave; and
    2. the percentage of entitled employees that took family-related leave, and a breakdown by gender.

  4. If all of the undertaking’s employees are entitled to family-related leave through social policy and/or collective bargaining agreements, it is sufficient to disclose this in order to meet the requirement of paragraph 93a.

Application Requirements

AR 96. Family-related leave include maternity leave, paternity leave, parental leave, and carers’ leave that is available under national law or collective agreements. For the purpose of this Standard, these concepts are defined as:

  1. maternity leave (also called pregnancy leave): employment-protected leave of absence for employed women directly around the time of childbirth (or, in some countries, adoption);
  2. paternity leave: leave from work for fathers or, where and in so far as recognised by national law, for equivalent second parents, on the occasion of the birth or adoption of a child for the purposes of providing care;
  3. parental leave: leave from work for parents on the grounds of the birth or adoption of a child to take care of that child, as defined by each Member State;
  4. carers’ leave from work: leave for workers to provide personal care or support to a relative, or a person who lives in the same household, in need of significant care or support for a serious medical reason, as defined by each Member State.

AR 97. With regard to paragraph 93 (a), employees entitled to family-related leave are those who are covered by regulations, organisational policies, agreements, contracts or collective bargaining agreements that contain family-related leave entitlements and have reported their entitlement to the undertaking or the undertaking is aware of the entitlement.  

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
70 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-16 – Compensation metrics (pay gap and total compensation)
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the percentage gap in pay between its female and male employees and the ratio between the remuneration of its highest paid individual and the median remuneration for its employees.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is twofold: to allow an understanding of the extent of any gap in the pay between women and men amongst the undertaking’s employees; and to provide insight into the level of remuneration inequality inside the undertaking and whether wide pay disparities exist.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 95 shall include:
    1. the gender pay gap, defined as the difference of average pay levels between female and male employees, expressed as percentage of the average pay level of male employees[1];
    2. the annual total remuneration ratio of the highest paid individual to the median annual total remuneration for all employees (excluding the highest-paid individual)[2]; and
    3. where applicable, any contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled and other changes to the underlying data that are to be considered.

  4. The undertaking may disclose a breakdown of the gender pay gap as defined in paragraph 97 (a) by employee category and/or by country/segment. The undertaking may also disclose the gender pay gap between employees by categories of employees broken down by ordinary basic salary and complementary or variable components.

  5. In relation to paragraph 97 (b), the undertaking may report this figure adjusted for purchasing power differences between countries, in which case it shall report the methodology used for the calculation.

    [1] This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #12 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Unadjusted gender pay gap”); and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Weighted average gender pay gap” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.

    [2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #8 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Excessive CEO pay ratio”).

Application Requirements

Pay gap

AR 98. When compiling the information required under paragraph 97 (a) for the gap in pay between its female and male employees (also known as the “gender pay gap”) the undertaking shall use the following methodology:

  1. include all employees’ gross hourly pay level; and
  2. apply the following formula to calculate the gender pay gap:

(𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑙𝑦 pay level 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑒𝑠 − 𝑎𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑙𝑦 pay level 𝑜𝑓 𝑓𝑒𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑒𝑠)

                                                                                                                                 ________________________________𝑥 100

𝐴𝑣𝑒𝑟𝑎𝑔𝑒 𝑔𝑟𝑜𝑠𝑠 ℎ𝑜𝑢𝑟𝑙𝑦 pay level 𝑜𝑓 𝑚𝑎𝑙𝑒 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑒𝑠

AR 99. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 97 (a), the undertaking shall provide any contextual information necessary to understand the data and how the data has been compiled (methodology). Information regarding how objective factors such as type of work and country of employment influence the gender pay gap may be reported.

AR 100.The measure of the undertaking’s gender pay gap shall be reported for the current reporting period and, if reported in previous sustainability reports, for the previous two reporting periods.

Total remuneration Ratio

AR 101.When compiling the information required by paragraph 97 (b), the undertaking shall:

  1. include all employees;
  2. consider, depending on the undertaking’s remuneration policies, all of thefollowing:
    1. base salary, which is the sum of guaranteed, short-term, and non-variable cash compensation;
    2. benefits in cash, which is the sum of the base salary and cash allowances, bonuses, commissions, cash profit-sharing, and other forms of variable cash payments;
    3. benefits in kind, such as cars, private health insurance, life insurance, wellness programs; and
    4. direct remuneration, which is the sum of benefits in cash, benefits in kind and total fair value of all annual long-term incentives (for example, stock option awards, restricted stock shares or units, performance stock shares or units, phantom stock shares, stock appreciation rights, and long-term cash awards).
  3. apply the following formula for the annual total remuneration ratio:

𝐴𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 remuneration 𝑓𝑜𝑟 𝑡ℎ𝑒 𝑢𝑛𝑑𝑒𝑟𝑡𝑎𝑘𝑖𝑛𝑔′𝑠 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑡 𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑑 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙
________________________________________________________________________________

𝑀𝑒𝑑𝑖𝑎𝑛 𝑒𝑚𝑝𝑙𝑜𝑦𝑒𝑒 𝑎𝑛𝑛𝑢𝑎𝑙 𝑡𝑜𝑡𝑎𝑙 remuneration (𝑒𝑥𝑐𝑙𝑢𝑑𝑖𝑛𝑔 𝑡ℎ𝑒 ℎ𝑖𝑔ℎ𝑒𝑠𝑡 − 𝑝𝑎𝑖𝑑 𝑖𝑛𝑑𝑖𝑣𝑖𝑑𝑢𝑎𝑙)

AR 102.To illustrate the contextual information, the undertaking may provide an explanation to understand the data and how the data has been compiled (methodology). Quantitative data, such as the annual total remuneration ratio, may not be sufficient on its own to understand pay disparity and its drivers. For example, pay ratios can be influenced by the size of the undertaking (for example, revenue, number of employees), its sector, its employment strategy (for example, reliance on outsourced workers or part-time employees, a high degree of automation), or currency volatility.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
71 S1 - Own workforce Metrics and targets S1-17 – Incidents, complaints and severe human rights impacts
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the number of work-related incidents and/or complaints and severe human rights impacts within its own workforce, and any related material fines, sanctions or compensation for the reporting period.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to allow an understanding of the extent to which work-related incidents and severe cases of human rights impacts are affecting its own workforce.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 100 shall include, subject to the relevant privacy regulations, work-related incidents of discrimination on the grounds of gender, racial or ethnic origin, nationality, religion or belief, disability, age, sexual orientation, or other relevant forms of discrimination involving internal and/or external stakeholders across operations in the reporting period. This includes incidents of harassment as a specific form of discrimination.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose:
    1. the total number of incidents of discrimination, including harassment, reported in the reporting period[1];
    2. the number of complaints filed through channels for people in the undertaking’s own workforce to raise concerns (including grievance mechanisms) and, where applicable, to the National Contact Points for OECD Multinational Enterprises related to the matters defined in paragraph 2 of this Standard, excluding those already reported in (a) above;
    3. the total amount of fines, penalties, and compensation for damages as a result of the incidents and complaints disclosed above, and a reconciliation of such monetary amounts disclosed with the most relevant amount presented in the financial statements; and
    4. where applicable, contextual information necessary to understand the data and how such data has been compiled.
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the following information regarding identified cases of severe human rights incidents (e.g., forced labour, human trafficking or child labour):
    1. the number of severe human rights incidents connected to the undertaking’s workforce in the reporting period, including an indication of how many of these are cases of nonrespect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. If no such incidents have occurred, the undertaking shall state this[2]; and
    2. the total amount of fines, penalties and compensation for damages for the incidents described in (a) above, and a reconciliation of the monetary amounts disclosed in the most relevant amount in the financial statements.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #7 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Incidents of discrimination”).

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory and additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #10 in Table I of Annex I and by indicator #14 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Violations of UNGC principles and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises” and “Number of identified cases of severe human rights issues and incidents”); and the information needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Number of benchmark constituents subject to social violations (absolute number and relative divided by all benchmark constituents), as referred to in international treaties and conventions, United Nations principles and, where applicable, national law” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.

Application Requirements

AR 103.In addition to the information required by paragraphs 103 and 104, the undertaking may disclose the status of incidents and/or complaints and actions taken with reference to the following:

  1. incidents reviewed by the undertaking;
  2. remediation plans being implemented;
  3. remediation plans that have been implemented, with results reviewed through routine internal management review processes; and (d) incidents no longer subject to action. 

AR 104. If the undertaking compiles the information described in AR 105, it shall consider the following:

  1. an incident is no longer subject to action if it is resolved, the case is completed, or no further action is required by the undertaking. For example, an incident for which no further action is required can include cases that are withdrawn or where the underlying circumstances that led to the incident no longer exist;
  2. remedial action is directed toward the alleged harasser and the alleged victim. Remedial action toward the victim may include offering to pay his/her expenses for counselling sessions, offering the victim some paid time off, offering to reinstate sick/vacation days if the victim has incurred any expenses due to the harassment (such as having used sick or vacation days); and
  3. remedial action toward the harasser may include giving the harasser a verbal and/or written warning, mandating anti-harassment counselling or sending the harasser to an appropriate seminar, harassment awareness and prevention training. A suspension without pay may also be an option. If the harasser has been disciplined earlier but his/her harassment does not cease, then more serious discipline may be required.

AR 105.Severe human rights incidents include instances of lawsuits, formal complaints through the undertaking or third-party complaint mechanisms, serious allegations in public reports or the media, where these are connected to the undertaking’s own workforce, and the fact of the incidents is not disputed by the undertaking, as well as any other severe impacts of which the undertaking is aware.

AR 106.In addition to the information required by paragraph 104 above, the undertaking may disclose the number of severe human rights incidents where the undertaking played a role securing remedy for those affected during the reporting period.

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S1.pdf None None None
72 S2 - Workers in the value chain Strategy S2 related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
  1. When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-2 paragraph 43, the undertaking shall disclose how the interests, views, and rights of its value chain workers could be materially impacted by the undertaking, including respect for their human rights, inform its strategy and business model. Value chain workers are a key group of affected stakeholders.

Application Requirements

AR 4. Disclosure Requirement ESRS 2 SBM-2 requires the undertaking to provide an understanding of whether and how it considers the role that its strategy and business model may play in creating, exacerbating or mitigating significant material impacts on value chain workers, and whether and how the business model and strategy are adapted to address such material impacts.

AR 5. While value chain workers may not be engaging with the undertaking at the level of its strategy or business model, their views can inform the undertaking’s assessment of its strategy and business model. The undertaking may disclose the views of the value chain workers and value chain workers’ representatives.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S2.pdf None None false
73 S2 - Workers in the value chain Strategy S2 related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
  1. When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose:
    • whether and how actual and potential impacts on value chain workers, as identified in ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities: (i) originate from or are connected to the undertaking’s strategy and business models, and (ii) inform and contribute to adapting the undertaking’s strategy and business model; and
    • the relationship between on the one hand its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on value chain workers, and on the other hand its strategy and business model.
  2. When fulfilling the requirements of ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose whether all value chain workers who are likely to be materially impacted by the undertaking, including impacts that are connected with the undertaking’s own operations and value chain, including through its products or services , as well as through its business relationships, are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2. In addition, the undertaking shall provide the following information:
    • a brief description of the types of value chain workers who could be materially impacted by the undertaking, including impacts that connected with the undertaking’s own operations and value chain, including through its products or services, as well as through its business relationships, and specify whether they are:
      1. workers working on the undertaking site but who are not part of own workforce, i.e., who are not self-employed workers or workers provided by third party undertakings primarily engaged in employment activities (covered through ESRS S1);
      2. workers working for entities in the undertaking’s upstream value chain (e.g., those involved in the extraction of metals or minerals or harvesting of commodities, in refining, manufacturing or other forms of processing);
      3. workers working for entities in the undertaking’s downstream value chain (e.g., those involved in the activities of logistics or distribution providers, franchisees, retailers);
      4. workers working in the operations of a joint venture or special purpose vehicle involving the reporting undertaking;
      5. workers who (within the prior categories or additionally) are particularly vulnerable to negative impacts whether due to their inherent characteristics or to the particular context, such as trade unionists, migrant workers, home workers, women or young workers.
    • any geographies, at country level or other levels, or commodities for which there is a significant risk of child labour, or of forced labour or compulsory labour, among workers in the undertaking’s value chain[1];
    • in the case of material negative impacts, whether they are either (i) widespread or systemic in contexts where the undertaking operates or has sourcing or other business relationships (e.g., child labour or forced labour in particular commodity supply chains in specific countries or regions), or (ii) related to individual incidents (e.g., an industrial accident or an oil spill) or to specific business relationships. This includes consideration of impacts on value chain workers that may arise from the transition to greener and climate-neutral operations. Potential impacts include impacts associated with innovation and restructuring, closure of mines, increased mining of minerals needed for the transition to a sustainable economy, and solar panel production;
    • in the case of material positive impacts, a brief description of the activities that result in the positive impacts (e.g., updated purchasing practices, capacity-building to supply chain workers), including providing opportunities for the workforce such as job creation and upskilling in the context of a ‘just transition’, and the types of value chain workers that are positively affected or could be positively affected; the undertaking may also disclose whether the positive impacts occur in specific countries or regions; and
    • any material risks and opportunities for the undertaking arising from impacts and dependencies on value chain workers.
  3. In describing the main types of value chain workers who are or could be negatively affected, based on the materiality assessment set out in ESRS 2 IRO-1, the undertaking shall disclose whether and how it has developed an understanding of how workers with particular characteristics, those working in particular contexts, or those undertaking particular activities may be at greater risk of harm.
  4. The undertaking shall disclose which, if any, of its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on its value chain workers relate to specific groups of value chain workers (for example, particular age groups, workers in a particular factory or country) rather than to all of the value chain workers.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from additional indicators related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicators number 12 and number 13 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Operations and suppliers at significant risk of incidents of child labour” and “Operations and suppliers at significant risk of incidents of forced or compulsory labour”).

Application Requirements

AR 6. Impacts on value chain workers can originate in the undertaking’s strategy or business model in a number of different ways. For example, impacts may relate to the undertaking’s value proposition(such as providing lowest cost products or services, or high-speed delivery, in ways that put pressure on labour rights in the upstream and downstream value chains), its value chain (such as relying on commodities of unclear provenance, without visibility on impacts on workers), or its cost structure and the revenue model (e.g. shifting inventory risk to suppliers, with knock-on effects on the labour rights of their workers).

AR 7. Impacts on value chain workers that originate in the strategy or the business model can also bring material risks to the undertaking. For example, in the context of a pandemic or other severe health crisis, undertakings that rely on contingent labour with little to no access to sick care and health benefits may face severe operational and business continuity risks as workers have no choice but to keep working while sick, further exacerbating the spread of the disease and causing major supply chain breakdowns. Another example is where selling goods premised on cheapest prices for customers create operational risks as suppliers under extreme price pressure may sub-contract production, leading to lower quality, and a longer, less transparent, and less controllable supply chain. Reputational and business opportunity risks linked to the exploitation of low-skilled, low-paid workers in sourcing geographies with minimal protections for them are also increasing with media backlash and consumer preferences moving to more ethically sourced or sustainable goods.

AR 8. Examples of particular characteristics of value chain workers that may be considered by the undertaking when responding to paragraph 12 relate to young workers that may be more susceptible to impacts on their physical and mental development, or women workers in a context where women are routinely discriminated against in the terms and conditions of work, or migrant workers in a context where the market for the supply of labour is poorly regulated and workers are routinely charged recruitment fees. For some workers, the inherent nature of the activity that they are required to undertake may put them at risk (e.g., workers required to handle chemicals or operate certain equipment or low paid workers who are on “zero hours” contracts).

AR 9. With regard to paragraph 13, material risks could also arise because of the undertaking’s dependency on value chain workers where low likelihood but high impact events may trigger financial effects; for example, where a global pandemic leads to severe health impacts on workers at all stages of the value chain resulting in major disruptions to production and distribution. Other examples of risk related to the undertaking’s dependency on value chain workers include a shortage in skilled workers or political decisions or legislation affecting value chain workers working for logistics providers. For example, if some workers in the undertaking’s value chain are at risk of forced labour, and the undertaking is importing products into countries where the law allows for the confiscation of imported goods that are suspected of being made with forced labour.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S2.pdf None None None
74 S2 - Workers in the value chain Impact, risk and opportunity management S2-1 – Policies related to value chain workers
      1. The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts on value chain workers, as well as associated material risks and opportunities.

      2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of material impacts on value chain workers specifically, as well as policies that cover material risks or opportunities related to value chain workers.

      3. The disclosure required by paragraph 14 shall contain the information on the undertaking’s policies to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to value chain workers in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. In addition, the undertaking shall specify whether such policies cover specific groups of value chain workers or all value chain workers.
      1. The undertaking shall describe its human rights policy commitments[1] that are relevant to value chain workers, including those processes and mechanisms to monitor compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises113. In its disclosure, it shall focus on those matters that are material in relation to, as well as the general approach to:
        1. respect for the human rights, including labour rights, of workers;
        2. engagement with value chain workers; and
        3. measures to provide and/or enable remedy for human rights impacts.
      1. The undertaking shall state whether its policies in relation to value chain workers explicitly address trafficking in human beings114, forced labour or compulsory labour and child labour. It shall also state whether the undertaking has a supplier code of conduct115.

      2. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how its policies with regard to value chain workers are aligned with internationally recognised instruments relevant to value chain workers, including the United Nations (UN) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights116. The undertaking shall also disclose the extent to which cases of non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises that involve value chain workers have been reported in its upstream and downstream value chain and, if applicable, an indication of the nature of such cases117.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #9 in Table III of Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of a human rights policy”).

113 This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (’Lack of processes and compliance mechanisms to monitor compliance with UN Global Compact principles and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises’).

114 This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of processes and measures for preventing trafficking in human beings”).

115 This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #4 in Table III of Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of a supplier code of conduct”).

116 This information supports the needs of benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to companies without due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organisation Conventions 1 to 8” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.

117 This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #10 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments; and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicators “Number of benchmark constituents subject to social violations (absolute number and relative divided by all benchmark constituents), as referred to in international treaties and conventions, United Nations principles and, where applicable, national law” and “Exposure of the benchmark portfolio to companies without due diligence policies on issues addressed by the fundamental International Labour Organisation Conventions 1 to 8” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.

Application Requirements

AR 10. If the policies are limited to the undertaking’s own workforce and do not cover workers in upstream and downstream entities and relationships, they shall be disclosed under ESRS S1 and not in relation to this requirement.

AR 11. If the disclosures under ESRS S1 include information relevant for workers in the value chain, a reference to this can be made here; disclosures on the remaining elements shall then be fulfilled under this Disclosure Requirement.

AR 12. The undertaking may disclose explanations of significant changes to the policies adopted during the reporting year (e.g., new expectations for suppliers, new or additional approaches to due diligence and remedy).

AR 13. The policy may take the form of a stand-alone policy regarding value chain workers or be included in a broader document such as a code of ethics or a general sustainability policy that has already been disclosed by the undertaking as part of another ESRS. In those cases, the undertaking shall provide an accurate cross-reference to identify the aspects of the policy that satisfy the requirements of this Disclosure Requirement.

AR 14. When disclosing the alignment of its policies with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the undertaking shall consider that the Guiding Principles refer to the International Bill of Rights, which consist of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the two Covenants that implement it, as well as the International Labour Organisation’s Declaration on Fundamental Rights and Principles at Work and the core conventions that underpin it, and may disclose its alignment with these instruments.

AR 15. When disclosing how external-facing policies are embedded, the undertaking may, for example, consider internal policies of responsible sourcing, and alignment with other policies relevant to value chain workers, for example, regarding forced labour. With regard to supplier codes of conduct that the undertaking may have, the summary shall indicate whether they include provisions addressing the safety of workers, precarious work (for example, the use of workers on short-term or limited hours contracts, workers employed via third parties, sub-contracting to third parties or use of informal workers), human trafficking, the use of forced labour or child labour, and whether such provisions are fully in line with applicable ILO standards.

AR 16. The undertaking may provide an illustration of the types of communication of its policies to those individuals, group of individuals or entities for whom they are relevant, either because they are expected to implement them (for example, the undertaking’s employees, contractors and suppliers), or because they have a direct interest in their implementation (for example, own workers, investors). It may disclose communication tools and channels (for example, flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face to face interactions, workers’ representatives), aimed at ensuring that the policy is accessible and that different audiences understand its implications. The undertaking may also explain how it identifies and removes potential barriers for dissemination, such as through translation into relevant languages or the use of graphic depictions.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S2.pdf None None MDR-P
75 S2 - Workers in the value chain Impact, risk and opportunity management S2-2 – Processes for engaging with value chain workers about impacts
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its general processes for engaging with value chain workers and their representatives about actual and potential impacts on them.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of whether and how the undertaking engages, as part of its ongoing due diligence process, with value chain workers and their legitimate representatives, or with credible proxies, about material actual and potential positive and/or negative impacts that do or are likely to affect them, and whether and how perspectives of value chain workers are taken into account in the decision-making processes of the undertaking.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how the perspectives of value chain workers inform its decisions or activities aimed at managing the actual and potential impacts on value chain workers. This shall include, where relevant, an explanation of:
    1. whether engagement occurs with value chain workers or their legitimate representatives directly, or with credible proxies that have insight into their situation;
    2. the stage(s) at which engagement occurs, the type of engagement, and the frequency of the engagement;
    3. the function and the most senior role within the undertaking that has operational responsibility for ensuring that this engagement happens, and that the results inform the undertaking’s approach;
    4. where applicable, Global Framework Agreements or for agreements that the undertaking has with global union federations related to respect of human rights of workers in the value chain, including their right to bargain collectively, and including an explanation of how the agreement enables the undertaking to gain insight into those workers’ perspectives; and
    5. where applicable, how the undertaking assesses the effectiveness of its engagement with workers in the value chain, including, where relevant, any agreements or outcomes that result.

  4. Where applicable, the undertaking shall disclose the steps it takes to gain insight into the perspectives of workers that may be particularly vulnerable to impacts and/or marginalised (for example, women workers, migrant workers, workers with disabilities).

  5. If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a general process to engage with workers in the value chain, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a process in place.

Application Requirements

AR 17. When describing which function or role has operational responsibility for such engagement and/or ultimate accountability, the undertaking may disclose whether this is a dedicated role or function or part of a broader role or function, and whether any capacity building activities have been offered to support the staff to undertake engagement. If it cannot identify such a position or function, it may state that this is the case. This disclosure could also be fulfilled by making reference to information disclosed according to ESRS 2 GOV-1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies.

AR 18. When preparing the disclosures described in paragraph 22 b) and c), the following illustrations may be considered:

  1. examples of stages at which engagement occurs are i) determining the approach to mitigation and ii) evaluation the effectiveness of mitigation;
  2. for type of engagement, these could be participation, consultation and/or information;
  3. for the frequency of the engagement, information may be provided on whether engagement occurs on a regular basis, at certain points in a project or business process, for example, when a new harvest season begins or a new production line is opened, as well as whether it occurs in response to legal requirements and/or in response to stakeholder requests and whether the result of the engagement is being integrated into the undertaking's decision- making processes; and
  4. for the role with operational responsibility, whether the undertaking requires relevant staff to have certain skills, or whether it provides training or capacity building to relevant staff to undertake engagement.

AR 19. Global Framework Agreements (GFA) serve to establish an ongoing relationship between a multinational enterprise and a Global Union Federation to ensure that the undertaking adheres to the same standards in every country in which it operates.

AR 20. To illustrate how the perspectives of value chain workers have informed specific decisions or activities of the undertaking, the undertaking may provide examples from the current reporting period. 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S2.pdf None None None
76 S2 - Workers in the value chain Impact, risk and opportunity management S2-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for value chain workers to raise concerns
  1. The undertaking shall describe the processes it has in place to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts on value chain workers that the undertaking is connected with, as well as channels available to value chain workers to raise concerns and have them addressed.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the formal means by which value chain workers can make their concerns and needs known directly to the undertaking and/or through which the undertaking supports the availability of such channels (for example, grievance mechanisms ) in the workplace of value chain workers, how follow up is carried out with these workers regarding the issues raised, and the effectiveness of these channels.

  3. The undertaking shall describe:
    1. its general approach to and processes for providing or contributing to remedy where it has caused or contributed to a material negative impact on value chain workers, including whether and how the undertaking assesses that the remedy provided is effective;
    2. any specific channels it has in place for value chain workers to raise their concerns or needs directly with the undertaking and have them addressed, including whether these are established by the undertaking itself and/or whether they are third-party mechanisms;
    3. the processes through which it supports or requires the availability of such channels in the workplace of value chain workers; and
    4. how it tracks and monitors issues raised and addressed, and how it ensures the effectiveness of the channels, including through involvement of stakeholders who are the intended users.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it assesses that value chain workers are aware of and trust these structures or processes as a way to raise their concerns or needs and have them addressed. In addition, the undertaking shall disclose whether it has policies in place regarding the protection of individuals that use them against retaliation. If such information has been disclosed in accordance with ESRS G1-1, the undertaking may refer to that information.

  5. If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a channel for raising concerns and/or does not support the availability of such a channel in the workplace of value chain workers, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a channel or processes in place.

 

Application Requirements

AR 21. In fulfilling the requirements set out by Disclosure Requirement ESRS S2-3, the undertaking may be guided by the content of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises focused on remediation and grievance mechanisms.

AR 22. Channels for raising concerns or needs include grievance mechanisms, hotlines, trade unions (where workers are unionised), dialogue processes or other means through which value chain workers or their legitimate representatives can raise concerns about impacts or explain needs that they would like the undertaking to address. This could include both channels provided by the undertaking directly and channels provided by the entities where the value chain workers are working, in addition to any other mechanisms the undertaking may use to gain insight into the management of impacts on workers, such as compliance audits. Where the undertaking is relying solely on information about the existence of such channels provided by its business relationships to answer this requirement, it may state that.

AR 23. To provide greater insight into the information covered in Disclosure Requirement ESRS S2-3, the undertaking may explain whether and how value chain workers that may be affected are able to access channels at the level of the undertaking they are employed by, or contracted to work for, in relation to each material impact.

AR 24. Third party mechanisms could include those operated by the government, NGOs, industry associations and other collaborative initiatives. The undertaking may disclose whether these are accessible to all workers who may be potentially or actually materially impacted by the undertaking, or individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of negative impacts.

AR 25. In relation to the protection of individuals that use the mechanisms against the retaliation, the undertaking may describe whether it treats grievances confidentially and with respect to the rights of privacy and data protection; and whether the mechanisms allow for workers to use them anonymously (for example, through representation by a third party).

AR 26. In disclosing whether and how the undertaking knows that value chain workers are aware of and trust any of these channels, the undertaking may provide relevant and reliable data about the effectiveness of these channels from the perspective of value chain workers themselves. Examples of sources of information are surveys of workers that have used such channels and their levels of satisfaction with the process and outcomes.

AR 27. In describing the effectiveness of channels for value chain workers to raise concerns, the undertaking may be guided by the following questions, based on the “effectiveness criteria for non-judicial grievance mechanisms”, as laid out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, in particular Principle 31. The below considerations may be applied to individual channels or to a collective system of channels:

  1. do the channels hold legitimacy by providing appropriate accountability for their fair conduct and building stakeholder trust?
  2. are the channels known and accessible to stakeholders?
  3. do the channels have clear and known procedures, with indicative timeframes?
  4. do the channels ensure reasonable access for stakeholders to sources of information, advice and expertise?
  5. do the channels offer transparency by providing sufficient information both to complainants and, where applicable, to meet any public interest?
  6. do outcomes achieved through the channels accord with internationally recognised human rights?
  7. does the undertaking identify insights from the channels that support continuous learning in both improving the channels and preventing future impacts?
  8. does the undertaking focus on dialogue with complainants as the means to reach agreed solutions, rather than seeking to unilaterally determine the outcome?
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S2.pdf None None None
77 S2 - Workers in the value chain Impact, risk and opportunity management S2-4 – Taking action on material impacts on value chain workers, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to value chain workers, and effectiveness of those actions
  1. The undertaking shall disclose how it takes action to address material impacts on value chain workers, and to manage material risks and pursue material opportunities related to value chain workers and the effectiveness of those actions.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is twofold. Firstly, it is to enable an understanding of any actions or initiatives through which the undertaking seeks to:
    1. prevent, mitigate and remediate the negative material impacts on value chain workers; and/or
    2. achieve positive material impacts for value chain workers.

Secondly, it is to enable an understanding of the ways in which the undertaking is addressing the material risks and pursuing the material opportunities related to workers in the value chain.

The undertaking shall provide a summarised description of the action plans and resources to manage its material impacts, risks, and opportunities related to value chain workers as per ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters.  

  1. In relation to material impacts, the undertaking shall describe:
    1. actions taken, planned or underway to prevent or mitigate material negative impacts on value chain workers;
    2. whether and how it has taken action to provide or enable remedy in relation to an actual material impact;
    3. any additional actions or initiatives it has in place with the primary purpose of delivering positive impacts for value chain workers; and
    4. how it tracks and assesses the effectiveness of such actions and initiatives in delivering intended outcomes for value chain workers.

  2. In relation to paragraph 30, the undertaking shall describe:
    1. the processes through which it identifies what action is needed and appropriate in response to a particular actual or potential negative impact on value chain workers;
    2. its approach to taking action in relation to specific material negative impacts on value chain workers, including any action in relation to its own purchasing or other internal practices, as well as capacity- building or other forms of engagement with entities in the value chain, or forms of collaborative action with industry peers or other relevant parties; and
    3. how it ensures that processes to provide or enable remedy in the event of material negative impacts are available and effective in their implementation and outcomes.

  3. In relation to material risks and opportunities, the undertaking shall describe:
    1. what action is planned or underway to mitigate material risks for the undertaking arising from its impacts and dependencies on value chain workers and how it tracks effectiveness in practice; and
    2. what action is planned or underway to pursue material opportunities for the undertaking in relation to value chain workers.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it takes action to avoid causing or contributing to material negative impacts on value chain workers through its own practices, including, where relevant, in relation to procurement, sales and data use. This may include disclosing what approach is taken when tensions arise between the prevention or mitigation of material negative impacts and other business pressures.

  5. The undertaking shall also disclose whether severe human rights issues and incidents connected to its upstream and downstream value chain have been reported and, if applicable, disclose these[1].

  6. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 32 (c), the undertaking shall consider ESRS 2 (see ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets) if it evaluates the effectiveness of an action by setting a target.

  7. The undertaking shall disclose what resources are allocated to the management of its material impacts, with information that enables users to gain an understanding of how the material impacts are managed.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #14 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Number of identified cases of severe human rights issues and incidents”).

Application Requirements

AR 28. It may take time to understand negative impacts and how the undertaking may be involved with them through its value chain, as well as to identify appropriate responses and put them into practice. Therefore, the undertaking shall consider:

  1. its general and specific approaches to addressing material negative impacts;
  2. its initiatives aimed at contributing to additional material positive impacts;
  3. how far it has progressed in its efforts during the reporting period; and (d) its aims for continued improvement.

AR 29. Appropriate action can vary according to whether the undertaking causes or contributes to a material impact or whether the material impact is directly linked to its own operations, products or services through a business relationship.

AR 30. Given that material negative impacts affecting value chain workers that have occurred during the reporting period may also be linked to entities or operations outside its direct control, the undertaking may disclose whether and how it seeks to use its leverage in its business relationships to manage those impacts. This may include using commercial leverage (for example, enforcing contractual requirements with business relationships or implementing incentives), other forms of leverage within the relationship (such as providing training or capacity-building on workers’ rights to entities with which the undertaking has a business relationships) or collaborative leverage with peers or other actors (such as initiatives aimed at responsible recruitment or ensuring workers receive an adequate wage).

AR 31. When the undertaking discloses its participation in an industry or multi-stakeholder initiative as part of its actions to address material negative impacts, the undertaking may disclose how the initiative, and its own involvement, is aiming to address the material impact concerned. It may disclose under ESRS S2-5 the relevant targets set by the initiative and progress towards them.

AR 32. When disclosing whether and how the undertaking considers actual and potential impacts on value chain workers in decisions to terminate business relationships and whether and how it seeks to address any negative impacts that may result from termination, the undertaking may include examples.

AR 33. In disclosing how it tracks the effectiveness of its actions to manage material impacts during the reporting period, the undertaking may disclose any lessons learned from the previous and current reporting periods.

AR 34. Processes used to track the effectiveness of actions can include internal or external auditing or verification, court proceedings and/or related court decisions, impact assessments, measurement systems, stakeholder feedback, grievance mechanisms, external performance ratings, and benchmarking.

AR 35. Reporting on effectiveness is aimed at enabling the understanding of the links between actions taken by the undertaking and the effective management of impacts. For example, to show the effectiveness of its actions to support its suppliers with improving their working conditions, the undertaking may disclose survey feedback from the suppliers’ workers showing that working conditions have improved since the time the undertaking began working with those suppliers. Additional information that the undertaking may provide includes data showing a decrease in the number of incidents identified through for instance, independent audits.

AR 36. With regard to initiatives or processes the undertaking has in place that are based on affected workers’ needs and with regard to progress in the implementation of such initiatives or processes, the undertaking may disclose:

  1. information about whether and how value chain workers and legitimate representatives or their credible proxies play a role in decisions regarding the design and implementation of these programmes or processes; and
  2. information about the intended or achieved positive outcomes for value chain workers of these initiatives or processes.

AR 37. The undertaking may disclose whether any initiatives or processes whose primary aim is to deliver positive impacts for value chain workers are designed also to support the achievement of one or more of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). For example, through a commitment to advance UN SDG 8 to “promote sustained, inclusive and sustainable economic growth, full and productive employment and decent work for all” the undertaking may be providing capacity-building to smallholders in its supply chain, resulting in increases in their income; or it may be supporting training to increase the proportion of women able to take delivery jobs in its downstream value chain.

AR 38. When disclosing the intended or achieved positive outcomes of its actions for value chain workers a distinction is to be made between evidence of certain activities having occurred (e.g., that x number of workers have received financial literacy training) from evidence of actual outcomes for workers (e.g., that x workers report that they are able to better manage their household budgets so as to meet their savings goals).

AR 39. When disclosing whether initiatives or processes also play a role in mitigating material negative  impacts, the undertaking may e.g., consider programmes that aim to advance women workers’ financial literacy that have resulted in more women being promoted as well as in reports of reduced sexual harassment in the workplace.

AR 40. When disclosing the material risks and opportunities related to the undertaking’s impacts or dependencies on value chain workers, the undertaking may consider the following:

  1. risks related to the undertaking’s impacts on value chain workers may include the reputational or legal exposure where value chain workers are found to be subject to forced labour or child labour;
  2. risks related to the undertaking’s dependencies on value chain workers may include disruption of business operations where a pandemic closes significant parts of its supply chain or distribution network;
  3. opportunities related to the undertaking’s impacts on value chain workers may include market differentiation and greater customer appeal from guaranteeing decent pay and conditions for non-employee workers; and
  4. business opportunities related to the undertaking’s dependencies on value chain workers might include the achievement of a future sustainable supply of a commodity by ensuring smallholder farmers earn enough to persuade future generations to keep farming that crop.

AR 41. When disclosing whether dependencies turn into risks, the undertaking shall consider external developments.

AR 42. When disclosing policies, actions and resources and targets related to the management of material risks and opportunities, in cases where risks and opportunities arise from a material impact, the undertaking may cross-reference its disclosures on policies, action and resources and targets in relation to that impact.

AR 43. The undertaking shall consider whether and how its process(es) to manage material risks related to value chain workers are integrated into its existing risk management process(es).

AR 44. When disclosing the resources allocated to the management of material impacts, the undertaking may disclose which internal functions are involved in managing the impacts and what types of action they take to address negative and advance positive impacts.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S2.pdf None None MDR-A
78 S2 - Workers in the value chain Metrics and targets S2-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the time-bound and outcome-oriented targets it may have set related to:
    1. reducing negative impacts on value chain workers; and/or
    2. advancing positive impacts on value chain workers; and/or
    3. managing material risks and opportunities related to value chain workers.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking is using time-bound and outcome-oriented targets to drive and measure its progress in addressing material negative impacts, and/or advancing positive impacts on value chain workers, and/or in managing material risks and opportunities related to value chain workers.

  3. The summarised description of the targets to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to value chain workers shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose the process for setting the targets, including whether and how the undertaking engaged directly with workers in the value chain, their legitimate representatives, or with credible proxies that have insight into their situation in:
    1. setting any such targets;
    2. tracking the undertaking’s performance against them; and
    3. identifying any lessons or improvements as a result of the undertaking’s performance.

Application Requirements

AR 45. When disclosing information about targets in accordance with paragraph 39, the undertaking may disclose:

  1. the intended outcomes to be achieved in the lives of value chain workers, being as specific as possible;
  2. the stability of the targets over time in terms of definitions and methodologies to enable comparability over time;
  3. the standards or commitments on which the targets are based (for instance codes of conduct, sourcing policies, global frameworks or industry codes).

AR 46. Targets related to material risks and opportunities may be the same as or distinct from targets related to material impacts. For example, a target to reach living wages for supply chain workers could both reduce impacts on those workers and reduce associated risks in terms of the quality and reliability of supply.

AR 47. The undertaking may also distinguish between short-, medium- and long-term targets covering the same policy commitment. For example, the undertaking may have a long term target to achieve an 80% reduction in health and safety incidents affecting the workers of a given supplier by 2030 and a near-term target to reduce their overtime hours of delivery drivers by x% while maintaining their income by 2024.

AR 48. When modifying or replacing a target in the reporting period, the undertaking may explain the change by cross-referencing it to significant changes in the business model or to broader changes in the accepted standard or legislation from which the target is derived to provide contextual information, as per ESRS 2 BP-2 Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S2.pdf None None MDR-T
79 S3 - Affected communities Strategy S3 related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
  1. When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-2, paragraph 43, the undertaking shall disclose how the views, interests, and rights of affected communities, including respect for their human rights (and their rights as indigenous peoples, where applicable), inform its strategy and business model. Affected communities are a key group of affected stakeholders.

Application Requirements

AR 3. Disclosure Requirement ESRS 2 SBM-2 requires the undertaking to provide an understanding of if and how it considers the role that its strategy and business model may play in creating, exacerbating or mitigating significant material impacts on affected communities, and whether and how the business model and strategy are adapted to address such material impacts.

AR 4. While affected communities may not be engaging with the undertaking at the level of its strategy or business model, their views can inform the undertaking’s assessment of its strategy and business model. The undertaking may disclose the views of affected communities and affected communities' representatives.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S3.pdf None None false
80 S3 - Affected communities Strategy S3 related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
  1. When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose:
    1. whether and how actual and potential impacts on affected communities as identified in ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities: (i) originate from or are connected to the undertaking’s strategy and business models, and (ii) inform and contribute to adapting the undertaking’s strategy and business model; and
    2. the relationship between its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on affected communities and its strategy and business model.

  2. When fulfilling the requirements of paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose whether all affected communities who are likely to be materially impacted by the undertaking, including impacts that are connected with the undertaking’s own operations and value chain, including through its products or services, as well as through its business relationships, are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2. In addition, the undertaking shall provide the following information:
    1. a brief description of the types of communities subject to material impacts by its own operations or through its upstream and downstream value chain, and specify whether they are:
      1. communities living or working around the undertaking’s operating sites, factories, facilities or other physical operations, or more remote communities affected by activities at those sites (for example by downstream water pollution);
      2. communities along the undertaking’s value chain (for example, those affected by the operations of suppliers’ facilities or by the activities of logistics or distribution providers);
      3. communities at one or both endpoints of the value chain (for example, at the point of extraction of metals or minerals or harvesting of commodities, or communities around waste or recycling sites);
      4. communities of indigenous peoples.
    2. in the case of material negative impacts, whether they are either (i) widespread or systemic in contexts where the undertaking operates or has sourcing or other business relationships (for example, marginalised populations suffering impacts on their health and quality of life in a highly industrialised area), or (ii) related to individual incidents in the undertaking’s own operations (e.g., a toxic waste spill affecting a community’s access to clean drinking water) or in a specific business relationship (e.g., a peaceful protest by communities against business operations that was met with a violent response from the undertaking’s security services). This includes consideration of impacts on affected communities that may arise from the transition to greener and climate- neutral operations. Potential impacts include impacts associated with innovation and restructuring, closure of mines, increased mining of minerals needed for the transition to a sustainable economy and solar panel production;
    3. in the case of material positive impacts, a brief description of the activities that result in the positive impacts (for example, capacity-building to support more and new forms of local livelihoods) and the types of communities that are positively affected or could be positively affected; the undertaking may also disclose whether the positive impacts occur in specific countries or regions; and
    4. any material risks and opportunities for the business arising from impacts and dependencies on affected communities.
  1. In describing the main types of communities who are or could be negatively affected, based on the materiality assessment set out in Disclosure Requirement ESRS 2 IRO-1, the undertaking shall disclose whether and how it has developed an understanding of how affected communities with particular characteristics or those living in particular contexts, or those undertaking particular activities may be at greater risk of harm.

  2. The undertaking shall disclose which, if any, of its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on affected communities relate to specific groups of affected communities rather than to all affected communities. 

Application Requirements

AR 5. Impacts on affected communities can originate in the undertaking’s strategy or business model in a number of different ways. For example, impacts may relate to the undertaking’s value proposition (such as, construction or commencement of projects with timelines that do not allow sufficient time for consultation with groups affected by the projects), its value chain (for example, land-use in countries in which ownership is often contested or records are unreliable or in which land-users such as indigenous peoples are unrecognised), or its cost structure and the revenue model (such as, aggressive strategies to minimise taxation, particularly with respect to operations in developing countries).

AR 6. Impacts on affected communities that originate in the strategy or business model can also bring material risks to the undertaking. For example, where the undertaking’s strategy involves moving into higher risk geographies in pursuit of certain commodities, and if affected communities resist its presence or object to its local practices, this may create extensive and costly delays, and affect the undertaking’s ability to secure future land concessions or permits. Similarly, if the undertaking’s business model relies on intensive water extraction at its plants, to the extent that it affects access to water for communities’ consumption, hygiene and livelihoods, this may result in reputationally-damaging boycotts, complaints and lawsuits.

AR 7. Examples of particular characteristics of affected communities that may be considered by the undertaking when responding to paragraph 10 may be an affected community that is physically or economically isolated and is particularly susceptible to introduced diseases or has limited access to social services and therefore relies on infrastructure set up by the undertaking. It may be because where land worked by women is purchased by the undertaking and payments go to male heads of households, women become further disenfranchised in the community. It may also be because the community is indigenous, and its members seek to exercise cultural or economic rights to the land owned or used by the undertaking – or by one of the entities with which it has a business relationship – in a context where their rights are not protected by the state. In addition, the undertaking shall consider whether different characteristics overlap. For example, characteristics such as ethnicity, socioeconomic status, migrant status and gender may create overlapping risks of harm for certain affected communities, or for distinct parts of those affected communities, since affected communities are often heterogeneous in nature.

AR 8. With regard to paragraph 11, material risks could also arise because of the undertaking’s dependency on affected communities where low likelihood but high impact events may trigger financial effects; for example, where a natural disaster leads to a catastrophic industrial accident involving the undertaking’s operations, resulting in severe harm to affected communities.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S3.pdf None None None
81 S3 - Affected communities Impact, risk and opportunity management S3-1 – Policies related to affected communities
  1. The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts on affected communities, as well as associated material risks and opportunities.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of material impacts on affected communities specifically, as well as policies that cover material risks or opportunities related to affected communities.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 12 shall contain the information on the undertaking’s policies to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to affected communities in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. In addition, the undertaking shall specify if such policies cover specific affected communities or all affected communities.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose any particular policy provisions for preventing and addressing impacts on indigenous peoples.

  5. The undertaking shall describe its human rights policy commitments[1] that are relevant to affected communities, including those processes and mechanisms to monitor compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. In its disclosure it shall focus on those matters that are material in relation to[2], as well as its general approach to:
    1. respect for the human rights of communities, and indigenous peoples specifically;
    2. engagement with affected communities; and
    3. measures to provide and/or enable remedy for human rights impacts.
  6. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how its policies with regard to affected communities are aligned with internationally recognised standards relevant to communities and indigenous peoples specifically, including the United Nations (UN) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The undertaking shall also disclose the extent to which cases of non-respect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises that involve affected communities have been reported in its own operations or in its upstream and downstream value chain and, if applicable, an indication of the nature of such cases[3][4].

  7. The policy may take the form of a stand-alone policy regarding communities or be included in a broader document such as a code of ethics or a general sustainability policy that has already been disclosed by the undertaking as part of another ESRS. In those cases, the undertaking shall provide an accurate cross-reference to identify the aspects of the policy that satisfy the requirements of this Disclosure Requirement.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #9 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of a human rights policy”).

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of processes and compliance mechanisms to monitor compliance with UN Global Compact principles and OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises”).

[3] This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #10 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Violations of UN Global Compact principles and Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises”); and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU)

[4] /1816 as set out by indicator “Number of benchmark constituents subject to social violations (absolute number and relative divided by all benchmark constituents), as referred to in international treaties and conventions, United Nations principles and, where applicable, national law” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.

Application Requirements

AR 9. The description shall include the key information necessary to ensure a faithful representation of the policies in relation to affected communities and, therefore, the undertaking shall consider explanations of significant changes to the policies adopted during the reporting year (for example, new or additional approaches to engagement, due diligence and remedy).

AR 10. When disclosing the  alignment of its policies with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the undertaking shall consider that the Guiding Principles refer to the International Bill of Rights, which consists of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the two Covenants that implement it, as well as the UN Declaration on the Rights of Indigenous Peoples, the International Labour Organisation’s Convention concerning Indigenous and Tribal Peoples (ILO No. 169) and the core conventions that underpin it, and may disclose its alignment with these instruments.

AR 11. The undertaking may provide an illustration of the types of communication of its policies to those individuals, group of individuals or entities for whom they are relevant, either because they are expected to implement them (for example, the undertaking’s employees, contractors and suppliers), or because they have a direct interest in their implementation (for example, own workers, investors). It may disclose communication tools and channels (for example, flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face to face interactions, workers’ representatives), aimed at ensuring that the policy is accessible and that different audiences understand its implications. The undertaking may also explain how it identifies and removes potential barriers for dissemination, such as through translation into relevant languages or the use of graphic depictions.

AR 12. When disclosing severe human rights issues and incidents connected to affected communities, the undertaking shall consider any legal disputes related to land rights and to the free, prior and informed consent of indigenous peoples.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S3.pdf None None MDR-P
82 S3 - Affected communities Impact, risk and opportunity management S3-2 – Processes for engaging with affected communities about impacts
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its general processes for engaging with affected communities and their representatives about actual and potential impacts on them.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of whether and how the undertaking engages, as part of its ongoing due diligence process, with affected communities, their legitimate representatives, or with credible proxies, about material actual and potential positive and/or negative impacts that do or are likely to affect them, and whether and how perspectives of affected communities are taken into account in the decision-making processes of the undertaking.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how the perspectives of affected communities inform its decisions or activities aimed at managing actual and potential impacts on communities. This shall include, where relevant, an explanation of:
    1. whether engagement occurs with affected communities or their legitimate representatives directly, or with credible proxies that have insight into their situation;
    2. the stage(s) at which engagement occurs, the type of engagement, and the frequency of the engagement;
    3. the function and the most senior role within the undertaking that has operational responsibility for ensuring this engagement happens, and that the results inform the undertaking’s approach;
    4. where applicable, how the undertaking assesses the effectiveness of its engagement with affected communities, including, where relevant, any agreements or outcomes that result.
  1. Where applicable, the undertaking shall disclose the steps it takes to gain insight into the perspectives of affected communities that may be particularly vulnerable to impacts and/or marginalised, and into the perspective of specific groups within the affected communities, such as women and girls.

  2. Where affected communities are indigenous peoples, the undertaking shall also disclose how it takes into account and ensures respect of their particular rights in its stakeholder engagement approach, including their right to free, prior and informed consent with regard to: (i) their cultural, intellectual, religious and spiritual property; (ii) activities affecting their lands and territories; and (iii) legislative or administrative measures that affect them. In particular, where engagement occurs with indigenous peoples, the undertaking shall also disclose whether and how indigenous peoples have been consulted on the mode and parameters of the engagement (for example, in designing the agenda, nature, and timeliness of the engagement).

  3. If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a general process to engage with affected communities, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a process in place.
     

Application Requirements

AR 13. Explanations of how the undertaking takes into account and ensures respect of the right of indigenous peoples to free, prior and informed consent may include information about processes to consult with indigenous peoples to obtain such consent.  The undertaking shall consider how the consultation includes a good faith negotiation with affected indigenous peoples to obtain their free, prior and informed consent where the undertaking affects the lands, territories or resources that indigenous peoples customarily own, occupy or otherwise use; or relocates them from land or territories subject to traditional ownership or under customary use or occupation; or affects or exploits their cultural, intellectual, religious and spiritual property.

AR 14. When describing which function or role has operational responsibility for such engagement and/or ultimate accountability, the undertaking may disclose whether this is a dedicated role or function or part of a broader role or function, and whether any capacity building activities have been offered to support the staff to undertake engagement. If it cannot identify such a position or function, it may state that this is the case. This disclosure could also be fulfilled by making reference to information disclosed according to ESRS 2 GOV-1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies.

AR 15. When preparing the disclosures described in paragraph 20 b) and c), the following illustrations may be considered:

  1. examples of stages at which engagement occurs are i) determining the approach to mitigation and ii) evaluating the effectiveness of mitigation;
  2. for type of engagement, these could be participation, consultation and/or information;
  3. for the frequency of the engagement, information may be provided on whether engagement occurs on a regular basis, at certain points in a project or business process; and
  4. for the role with operational responsibility, whether the undertaking requires relevant staff to have certain skills, or whether it provides training or capacity building to relevant staff to undertake engagement. In the case of material impacts, risks and opportunities related to indigenous peoples, this includes training on indigenous people’s rights, including on free, prior and informed consent.

AR 16. To illustrate how the perspectives of communities have informed specific decisions or activities of the undertaking, the undertaking may provide examples from the current reporting period.  

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S3.pdf None None None
83 S3 - Affected communities Impact, risk and opportunity management S3-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for affected communities to raise concerns
  1. The undertaking shall describe the processes it has in place to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts on affected communities that the undertaking is connected with, as well as channels available to affected communities to raise concerns and have them addressed.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the formal means by which affected communities can make their concerns and needs known directly to the undertaking, and/or through which the undertaking supports the availability of such channels (for example, grievance mechanisms) by its business relationships, how follow up is performed with these communities regarding the issues raised, and the effectiveness of these channels.
  1. The undertaking shall describe:
    1. its general approach to and processes for providing or contributing to remedy where it has identified that it has caused or contributed to a material negative impact on affected communities, including whether and how the undertaking assesses that the remedy provided is effective;
    2. any specific channels it has in place for affected communities to raise their concerns or needs directly with the undertaking and have them addressed, including whether these are established by the undertaking itself and/or through participation in third-party mechanisms;
    3. its processes through which the undertaking supports the availability of such channels by its business relationships; and
    4. how it tracks and monitors issues raised and addressed, and how it ensures the effectiveness of the channels, including through involvement of stakeholders who are the intended users of those channels.

  2. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it assesses that affected communities are aware of and trust these structures or processes as a way to raise their concerns or needs and have them addressed. In addition, the undertaking shall disclose whether it has policies in place regarding the protection of individuals that use them against retaliation. If such information has been disclosed in accordance with ESRS G1-1, the undertaking may refer to that information.

  3. If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a channel for raising concerns and/or does not support the availability of such a channel by its business relationships, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a channel or processes in place.

Application Requirements

AR 17. In fulfilling the requirements set out by Disclosure Requirement ESRS S3-3, the undertaking may be guided by the content of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises focused on remediation and grievance mechanisms.

AR 18. Channels for raising concerns or needs, include grievance mechanisms, hotlines, dialogue processes or other means through which affected communities or their legitimate representatives can raise concerns about impacts or explain needs that they would like the undertaking to address. This could include channels provided by the undertaking directly, in addition to any other mechanisms the undertaking may use to gain insight into the management of impacts on communities, such as compliance audits. Where the undertaking is relying solely on information about the existence of such channels provided by its business relationships to answer this requirement, it may state that.

AR 19. To provide greater insight into the information covered in ESRS S3-3, the undertaking may explain whether and how communities that may be affected are able to access channels at the level of the undertaking they are affected by, in relation to each material impact. Relevant insights include information on whether affected communities can access channels in a language they understand, and whether they have been consulted in the design of such channels.

AR 20. Third party mechanisms could include those operated by the government, NGOs, industry associations and other collaborative initiatives.  The undertaking may disclose whether these are accessible to all affected communities who may be potentially or actually materially impacted by the undertaking, or individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of negative impacts.

AR 21. In relation to the protection of individuals that use the mechanisms against retaliation, the undertaking may describe whether it treats grievances confidentially and with respect to the rights of privacy and data protection; and whether to the mechanisms can be used anonymously (for example, through representation by a third party).

AR 22. When disclosing processes related to providing and enabling remedy for indigenous peoples, relevant information includes whether and how the undertaking has considered their customs, traditions, rules and legal systems.

AR 23. In disclosing whether and how the undertaking knows that affected communities are aware of and trust any of these channels, the undertaking may provide relevant and reliable data about the effectiveness of these channels from the perspective of affected communities themselves. Examples of sources of information are surveys of community members that have used such channels and their levels of satisfaction with the process and outcomes.

AR 24. In describing the effectiveness of channels for affected communities to raise concerns, the undertaking may be guided by the following questions, based on the “effectiveness criteria for non- judicial grievance mechanisms”, as laid out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, in particular Principle 31. The below considerations may be applied on an individual channel basis or for the collective system of channels:

  1. do the channels hold legitimacy by providing appropriate accountability for their fair conduct and building stakeholder trust?
  2. are the channels known and accessible to stakeholders?
  3. do the channels have clear and known procedures, set timeframes and clarity on the processes?
  4. do the channels ensure reasonable access to sources of information, advice and expertise?
  5. do the channels offer transparency by providing sufficient information both to complainants and, where applicable, to meet any public interest at stake?
  6. do the outcomes achieved through the channels accord with internationally recognised human rights?
  7. does the undertaking identify insights from the channels that support continuous learning in both improving the channels and preventing future impacts?
  8. does the undertaking focus on dialogue with complainants as the means to reach agreed solutions, rather than seeking to unilaterally determine the outcome? 
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S3.pdf None None None
84 S3 - Affected communities Impact, risk and opportunity management S3-4 – Taking action on material impacts on affected communities, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to affected communities, and effectiveness of those actions
  1. The undertaking shall disclose how it takes action to address material impacts on affected communities, and to manage material risks and pursue material opportunities related to affected communities and the effectiveness of those actions.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is twofold. Firstly, it is to provide an understanding of any actions and initiatives through which the undertaking seeks to:
    1. prevent, mitigate and remediate the negative material impacts on affected communities; and/or
    2. achieve positive material impacts for affected communities.

Secondly, it is to enable an understanding of the ways in which the undertaking is addressing the material risks and pursuing the material opportunities related to affected communities.

The undertaking shall provide a summarised description of the action plans and resources to manage its material impacts, risks, and opportunities related to affected communities as per ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters.

  1. In relation to material impacts, the undertaking shall describe:
    1. actions taken, planned or underway to prevent or mitigate material negative impacts on affected communities;
    2. whether and how it has taken action to provide or enable remedy in relation to an actual material impact;
    3. any additional actions or initiatives it has in place with the primary purpose of delivering positive impacts for affected communities; and
    4. how it tracks and assesses the effectiveness of these actions and initiatives in delivering intended outcomes for affected communities.

  2. In relation to paragraph 29, the undertaking shall describe:
    1. the processes through which it identifies what action is needed and appropriate in response to a particular actual or potential negative impact on affected communities;
    2. its approach to taking action in relation to specific material negative impacts on communities, including any action in relation to its own practices regarding land acquisition, planning and construction, operation or closure practices, as well as whether wider industry or collaborative action with other relevant parties will be required; and
    3. how it ensures that processes to provide or enable remedy in the event of material negative impacts are available and effective in their implementation and outcomes.

  3. In relation to material risks and opportunities, the undertaking shall describe:
    1. what action is planned or underway to mitigate material risks for the undertaking arising from its impacts and dependencies on affected communities and how it tracks effectiveness in practice; and
    2. what action is planned or underway to pursue material opportunities for the undertaking in relation to affected communities.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it takes action to avoid causing or contributing to material negative impacts on affected communities through its own practices, including, where relevant, in relation to planning, land acquisition and exploitation, finance, extraction or production of raw materials, use of natural resources, and management of environmental impacts. This may include disclosing what approach is taken when tensions arise between the prevention or mitigation of material negative impacts and other business pressures.

  5. The undertaking shall also disclose whether severe human rights issues and incidents connected to affected communities have been reported and, if applicable, disclose these[1].

  6. When disclosing the information required under paragraph 31 (c), the undertaking shall consider ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets if it evaluates the effectiveness of an action by setting a target.

  7. The undertaking shall disclose what resources are allocated to the management of its material impacts, with information that enables users to gain an understanding of how the material impacts are managed.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #14 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Number of identified cases of severe human rights issues and incidents”).

Application Requirements

AR 25. It may take time to understand negative impacts and how the undertaking may be involved with them through its value chain, as well as to identify appropriate responses and put them into practice. Therefore, the undertaking shall consider:

  1. its general and specific approaches to addressing material negative impacts;
  2. its social investment or other development programmes aimed at contributing to additional material positive impacts;
  3. how far it has progressed in its efforts during the reporting period; and
  4. its aims for continued improvement.

AR 26. Appropriate action can vary according to whether the undertaking causes or contributes to a material impact, or whether the material impact is directly linked to its own operations, products or services through a business relationship.

AR 27. Given that material negative impacts affecting communities that have occurred during the reporting period may also be linked to entities or operations outside its direct control, the undertaking may disclose whether and how it seeks to use its leverage in its business relationships to manage those impacts. This may include using commercial leverage (for example, enforcing contractual requirements with business relationships or implementing incentives), other forms of leverage within the relationship (such as providing training or capacity-building on the rights of indigenous peoples to entities with which the undertaking has a  business relationships) or collaborative leverage with peers or other actors (such as initiatives aimed at minimising security-related impacts on communities or participating in company-community partnerships).

AR 28. Impacts on communities may stem from environmental matters which are disclosed by the undertaking under the ESRS E1 to E5. Examples include:

  1. ESRS E1 Climate Change: The implementation of climate change mitigation plans may require the undertaking to invest in renewable energy projects that may affect the lands, territories and natural resources of indigenous peoples. If the undertaking does not consult with the affected indigenous peoples , it could negatively impact the affected communities’ right to free, prior and informed consent;
  2. ESRS E2 Pollution: The undertaking may negatively impact affected communities by failing to protect them from pollution from a particular production facility that causes them health-related issues;
  3. ESRS E3 Water and marine sources: The undertaking may negatively impact the access to clean drinking water of communities when withdrawing water in water stressed areas;
  4. ESRS E4 Biodiversity and ecosystems: The undertaking may negatively affect the livelihood of local farmers through operations that contaminate soil. Additional examples include the sealing of land through building new infrastructure, which can eradicate plant species that are critical for, for example, local biodiversity or to filter water for communities; or the introduction of invasive species (whether plants or animals) that can impact ecosystems and cause subsequent harm;
  5. ESRS E5 Resource use and circular economy: The undertaking may negatively impact the lives of communities by affecting their health through the mismanagement of hazardous waste.

Where the connection between environmental impacts and local communities is addressed in the disclosures within the Disclosure Requirements ESRS E1-E5, the undertaking may cross-reference to those and clearly identify such disclosures.

AR 29. When the undertaking discloses its participation in an industry or multi-stakeholder initiative as part of its actions to address material negative impacts, the undertaking may disclose how the initiative, and its own involvement, is aiming to address the material impact concerned. It may disclose under ESRS S3-5 the relevant targets set by the initiative and progress towards them.

AR 30. When disclosing whether and how the undertaking considers actual and potential impacts on affected communities in decisions to terminate business relationships and whether and how it seeks to address any negative impacts that may result from termination, the undertaking may include examples.

AR 31. In disclosing how it tracks the effectiveness of actions to manage material impacts during the reporting period, the undertaking may disclose any lessons learned from the previous and current reporting periods.

AR 32. Processes used to track the effectiveness of actions can include internal or external auditing or verification, court proceedings and/or related court decisions, impact assessments, measurement systems, stakeholder feedback, grievance mechanisms, external performance ratings, and benchmarking.

AR 33. Reporting on effectiveness is aimed at enabling the understanding of the links between actions taken by an undertaking and the effective management of impacts.

AR 34. With regard to initiatives or processes whose primary aim is to deliver positive impacts for affected communities that are based on affected communities’ needs, and with regard to progress in the implementation of such initiatives or processes, the undertaking may disclose:

  1. information about whether and how affected communities and legitimate representatives or their credible proxies play a role in decisions regarding the design and implementation of these investments or programmes; and
  2. information about the intended or achieved positive outcomes for affected communities of these investments or programmes.
  3. an explanation of the approximate scope of affected communities covered by the described social investment or development programmes, and, where applicable, the rationale for why selected communities were chosen for a given social investment or development programme's implementation.

AR 35. The undertaking may disclose whether any initiatives or processes whose primary aim is to deliver positive impacts for affected communities are designed also to support the achievement of one or more of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). For example, through a commitment to advance UN SDG 5 to “achieve gender equality and empower all women and girls” the undertaking may be taking thoughtful measures to include women in the consultation process with an affected community to meet standards of effective stakeholder engagement, which can help empower the women in the process itself, but potentially also in their daily lives.

AR 36. When disclosing the intended or achieved positive outcomes of its actions  for affected communities a distinction is to be made between evidence of certain activities having occurred (for example, that x number of women community members have been provided with training on how to become local suppliers to the undertaking) from evidence of actual outcomes for affected communities (for example, that x women community members have set up small businesses and have had their contracts with the undertaking renewed year-on-year).

AR 37. When disclosing whether initiatives or processes also play a role in mitigating material negative impacts, the undertaking may for example consider programmes that aim to improve local infrastructure surrounding an undertaking’s operations, such as improvements in roads leading to a reduction in the number of severe traffic accidents involving community members.

AR 38. When disclosing the material risks and opportunities related to the undertaking’s impacts or dependencies on affected communities, the undertaking may consider the following:

  1. risks related to the undertaking’s impacts on affected communities may include the reputational or legal exposure, as well as operational risks, where affected communities protest against resettlements or the loss of access to lands, leading to costly delays, boycotts, or lawsuits;
  2. risks related to the undertaking’s dependencies on affected communities may include disruption of business operations where indigenous peoples decide to withdraw their consent to a project on their lands, forcing the undertaking to significantly modify or abandon the project;
  3. business opportunities related to the undertaking’s impacts on affected communities may include more easily financing projects and being a partner of choice for communities, governments and other businesses; and
  4. opportunities related to the undertaking’s dependencies on affected communities may include the development of positive relationships between the undertaking and indigenous peoples that enable existing projects to expand with strong support.

AR 39. In disclosing the information in AR 41, the undertaking may consider explanations of risks and opportunities stemming from environmental impacts or dependencies (please refer to AR 31 for further details), including related human rights (or social) impacts. Examples include reputational risks stemming from the impact on the health of communities of unmanaged polluting discharges; or the financial effects of protests that may disrupt or interrupt an undertaking’s activities, for example, in response to operations in water stressed areas that may impact the lives of affected communities.

AR 40. When disclosing whether dependencies turn into risks, the undertaking shall consider external developments.

AR 41. When disclosing policies, action and resources and targets related to the management of material risks and opportunities, in cases where risks and opportunities arise from a material impact, the undertaking may cross-reference its disclosures on policies, actions and resources and targets in relation to that impact.

AR 42. The undertaking shall consider whether and how its processes to manage material risks related to affected communities are integrated into its existing risk management processes.

AR 43. When disclosing the resources allocated to the management of material impacts, the undertaking may disclose which internal functions are involved in managing the impacts and what types of action they take to address negative and advance positive impacts.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S3.pdf None None MDR-A
85 S3 - Affected communities Metrics and targets S3-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the time-bound and outcome-oriented targets it may have set related to:
    1. reducing negative impacts on affected communities; and/or
    2. advancing positive impacts on affected communities; and/or
    3. managing material risks and opportunities related to affected communities.
  1. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking is using time-bound and outcome-oriented targets to drive and measure its progress in addressing material negative impacts, and/or advancing positive impacts on affected communities, and/or in managing material risks and opportunities related to affected communities.

  2. The summarised description of the targets to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to affected communities shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose the process for setting the targets, including whether and how the undertaking engaged directly with affected communities, their legitimate representatives, or with credible proxies that have insight into their situation in:
    1. setting any such targets;
    2. tracking the undertaking’s performance against them; and
    3. identifying, any, lessons or improvements as a result of the undertaking’s performance.

Application Requirements

AR 44. When disclosing information about targets in accordance with paragraph 38, the undertaking may disclose:

  1. the intended outcomes to be achieved in the lives of affected communities, being as specific as possible;
  2. the stability of the targets over time in terms of definitions and methodologies to enable comparability over time;
  3. the standards or commitments which the targets are based on (for instance codes of conduct, sourcing policies, global frameworks or industry codes).

AR 45. Targets related to material risks and opportunities may be the same as or distinct from targets related to material impacts.  For example, a target to fully restore livelihoods of affected communities following resettlement could both reduce impacts on those communities and reduce associated risks such as community protests.

AR 46. The undertaking may also distinguish between short-, medium- and long-term targets covering the same policy commitment. For example, the undertaking may have as a main objective to employ community members at a local mining site, with the long-term goal of staffing 100% locally by 2025, and with the short-term objective of adding x percent of local employees every year up and until 2025.

AR 47. When modifying or replacing a target in the reporting period, the undertaking may explain the change by linking it to significant changes in the business model or to broader changes in the accepted standard or legislation from which the target is derived to provide contextual information as per ESRS 2 BP-2 Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S3.pdf None None MDR-T
86 S4 - Consumers and end users Strategy S4 related to ESRS 2 SBM-2 – Interests and views of stakeholders
  1. When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-2, paragraph 43, the undertaking shall disclose how the interests, views and rights of its consumers and/or end-users, including respect for their human rights, inform its strategy and business model. Consumers and/or end-users are a key group of affected stakeholders.

Application Requirements

AR 3. ESRS 2 SBM-2 requires the undertaking to provide an understanding of if and how it considers whether its strategy and business model play a role in creating, exacerbating or (conversely) mitigating significant material impacts on consumers and/or end-users, and whether and how the business model and strategy are adapted to address such material impacts.

AR 4.  While consumers and/or end-users may not be engaging with the undertaking at the level of its strategy or business model, their views can inform the undertaking’s assessment of its strategy and business model. The undertaking may disclose the views of the (actual or potential) materially affected consumers and/or end-users’ legitimate representatives or those of credible proxies that have insight into their situation.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S4.pdf None None false
87 S4 - Consumers and end users Strategy S4 related to ESRS 2 SBM-3 – Material impacts, risks and opportunities and their interaction with strategy and business model
  1. When responding to ESRS 2 SBM-3 paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose:
    1. whether and how actual and potential impacts on consumers and/or end-users as identified in Disclosure Requirements ESRS 2 IRO-1 Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities: (i) originate from or are connected to the undertaking’s strategy and business model, and (ii) inform and contribute to adapting the undertaking’s strategy and business model, and
    2. the relationship between its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on consumers and/or end-users and its strategy and business model.

  2. When fulfilling the requirements of paragraph 48, the undertaking shall disclose whether all consumers and/or end-users who are likely to be materially impacted by the undertaking, including impacts connected with the undertaking’s own operations and value chain, including through its products or services, as well as through its business relationships, are included in the scope of its disclosure under ESRS 2. In addition, the undertaking shall disclose the following information:
    1. a brief description of the types of consumers and/or end-users subject to material impacts by its own operations or through its value chain, and specify whether they are:
      1. consumers and/or end-users of products that are inherently harmful to people and/or increase risks for chronic disease;
      2. consumers and/or end-users of services that potentially negatively impact their rights to privacy, to have their personal data protected, to freedom of expression and to non- discrimination;
      3. consumers and/or end-users who are dependent on accurate and accessible product- or service- related information, such as manuals and product labels, to avoid potentially damaging use of a product or service;
      4. consumers and/or end-users who are particularly vulnerable to health or privacy impacts or impacts from marketing and sales strategies, such as children or financially vulnerable individuals;
    2. in the case of material negative impacts, whether they are either (i) widespread or systemic in contexts where the undertaking sells or provides its products or services (for example, state surveillance that affects the privacy of service users), or (ii) related to individual incidents (for example, a defect linked to a particular product) or to specific business relationships (for example, a business partner uses marketing that inappropriately targets young consumers);
    3. in the case of material positive impacts, a brief description of the activities that result in the positive impacts (for example, product design that improves its accessibility for persons with disabilities) and the types of consumers and/or end-users that are positively affected or could be positively affected; the undertaking may also disclose whether the positive impacts occur in specific countries or regions; and
    4. any material risks and opportunities for the business arising from impacts and dependencies on consumers and/or end-users.

  3. In describing the main types of consumers and/or end-users who are or could be negatively affected, based on the materiality assessment set out in ESRS 2 IRO-1, the undertaking shall disclose whether and how it has developed an understanding of how consumers and/or end-users with particular characteristics, or those using particular products or services, may be at greater risk of harm.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose which, if any, of its material risks and opportunities arising from impacts and dependencies on consumers and/or end-users, relate to specific groups of consumers and/or end-users (for example, particular age groups) rather than to all consumers and/or end-users.

 

Application Requirements

AR 5. Impacts on consumers and/or end-users can originate in the undertaking’s business model or strategy in a number of different ways. For example, impacts may relate to the undertaking’s value proposition (for example, providing online platforms with potential for online and offline harm), its value chain (for example, speed in developing products or services, or delivering projects, with risks to health and safety), or its cost structure and the revenue model (for example, sales-maximising incentives that put consumers at risk).

AR 6. Impacts on consumers and/or end-users that originate in the strategy or business model can also bring material risks to the undertaking. For example, if the undertaking’s business model is premised on incentivising its sales force to sell high volumes of a product or service (for example, credit cards or pain medicine) at speed, and this results in large-scale harm to consumers, the undertaking may face lawsuits and reputational damage affecting its future business and credibility.

AR 7. Examples of particular characteristics of consumers and/or end-users that may be considered by the undertaking when responding to paragraph 11 include young consumers and/or end-users who may be more susceptible to impacts on their physical and mental development, or who lack financial literacy and may be more susceptible to exploitative sales or marketing practices. They may also include women in a context where women are routinely discriminated against in their access to particular services or in the marketing of particular products.

AR 8. With regard to paragraph 12, the risks could arise because of the undertaking’s dependency on consumers and/or end-users where low likelihood but high impact events may trigger financial effects, for example, where a global pandemic leads to severe impacts on certain consumers’ livelihoods resulting in major changes in patterns of consumption.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S4.pdf None None None
88 S4 - Consumers and end users Impact, risk and opportunity management S4-1 – Policies related to consumers and end-users
  1. The undertaking shall describe its policies adopted to manage its material impacts of its products and/or services on consumers and end-users, as well as associated material risks and opportunities.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of material impacts on consumers and/or end-users specifically, as well as policies that cover material risks or opportunities related to consumers and/or end-users.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 13 shall contain the information on the undertaking’s policies to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to consumers and/or end-users in accordance with ESRS 2 MDR-P Policies adopted to manage material sustainability matters. In addition, the undertaking shall specify if such policies cover specific groups or all consumers and/or end-users.

  4. The undertaking shall describe its human rights policy commitments[1] that are relevant to consumers and/or end-users, including those processes and mechanisms to monitor compliance with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises. In its disclosure it shall focus on those matters that are material, as well as the general approach in relation to[2]:
    1. respect for the human rights of consumers and/or end-users;
    2. engagement with consumers and/or end-users; and
    3. measures to provide and/or enable remedy for human rights impacts.

  5. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how its policies with regard to consumers and/or end-users are aligned with internationally recognised instruments relevant to consumers and/or end-users, including United Nations (UN) Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The undertaking shall also disclose the extent to which cases of nonrespect of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, ILO Declaration on Fundamental Principles and Rights at Work or OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises that involve consumers and/or end-users have been reported in its downstream value chain and, if applicable, an indication of the nature of such cases[3].

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #9 in Table III of Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of a human rights policy”).

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #11 in Table I of Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments.

[3] This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from a mandatory indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #10 in Table I of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Violations of UN Global Compact principles  and Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises”); and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Number of benchmark constituents subject to social violations (absolute number and relative divided by all benchmark constituents), as referred to in international treaties and conventions, United Nations principles and, where applicable, national law” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.

Application Requirements

AR 9. The description shall include the key information necessary to ensure a faithful representation of the policies in relation to consumers and end-users, and therefore, the undertaking shall consider explanations of significant changes to the policies adopted during the reporting year (for example, new expectations for business customers, new or additional approaches to due diligence and remedy).

AR 10. The policy may take the form of a stand-alone policy regarding consumers and/or endusers or be included in a broader document such as a code of ethics or a general sustainability policy that has already been disclosed by the undertaking as part of another

ESRS. In those cases, the undertaking shall provide an accurate cross-reference to identify the aspects of the policy that satisfy the requirements of this Disclosure Requirement.

AR 11. In disclosing its alignment of its policies with the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights, the undertaking shall consider that the Guiding Principles refer to the International Bill of Human Rights, which consists of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights and the two Covenants that implement it, and may disclose its alignment with these instruments.

AR 12. When disclosing how external facing policies are embedded, the undertaking may, for example, consider internal-facing sales and distribution policies and alignment with other policies relevant to consumers and/or end-users. The undertaking shall also consider its policies for safeguarding the veracity and usefulness of information provided to potential and actual consumers and/or end-users, both before and after sale.

AR 13. The undertaking may provide an illustration of the types of communication of its policies to those individuals, group of individuals or entities for whom they are relevant, either because they are expected to implement them (for example, the undertaking’s employees, contractors and suppliers), or because they have a direct interest in their implementation (for example, own workers, investors). It may disclose communication tools and channels (for example, flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face to face interactions, workers’ representatives), aimed at ensuring that the policy is accessible and that different audiences understand its implications. The undertaking may also explain how it identifies and removes potential barriers for dissemination, such as through translation into relevant languages or the use of graphic depictions.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S4.pdf None None MDR-P
89 S4 - Consumers and end users Impact, risk and opportunity management S4-2 – Processes for engaging with consumers and end-users about impacts
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its general processes for engaging with consumers and end-users and their representatives about actual and potential impacts on them.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of whether and how the undertaking engages, as part of its ongoing due diligence process, with consumers and/or end-users, their legitimate representatives, or with credible proxies, about material actual and potential positive and/or negative impacts that do or are likely to affect them, and whether and how perspectives of consumers and/or end-users are taken into account in the decision-making processes of the undertaking.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how the perspectives of consumers and/or endusers inform its decisions or activities aimed at managing actual and potential impacts on consumers and/or end-users. This shall include, where relevant, an explanation of:
    1. whether engagement occurs with affected consumers and/or end-users or their legitimate representatives directly, or with credible proxies that have insight into their situation;
    2. the stage(s) at which engagement occurs, the type of engagement, and the frequency of the engagement;
    3. the function and the most senior role within the undertaking that has operational responsibility for ensuring this engagement happens and that the results inform the undertaking’s approach; and
    4. where applicable, how the undertaking assesses the effectiveness of its engagement with consumers and/or end-users, and, where relevant, any agreements or outcomes that result from such engagement.

  4. Where applicable, the undertaking shall disclose the steps it takes to gain insight into the perspectives of consumers and/or end-users that may be particularly vulnerable to impacts and/or marginalised (for example, people with disabilities, children, etc.).

  5. If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a general process to engage with consumers and/or end-users, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a process in place.

Application Requirements

AR 14. Credible proxies who have knowledge of the interests, experiences or perspectives of consumers and end-users could include national consumer protection bodies for some consumers.

AR 15. When describing which function or role has operational responsibility for such engagement and/or ultimate accountability, the undertaking may disclose whether this is a dedicated role or function or part of a broader role or function, and whether any capacity building activities have been offered to support the staff to undertake engagement. If it cannot identify such a position or function, it may state that this is the case. This disclosure could also be fulfilled by making reference to information disclosed according to ESRS 2 GOV-1 The role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies.

AR 16. When preparing the disclosures described in paragraph 20 b) and c), the following illustrations may be considered:

  1. for stage(s) at which engagement occurs, examples could be in determining mitigation approaches or in evaluating their effectiveness;
  2. for type of engagement, these could be participation, consultation and/or information;
  3. for the frequency of the engagement, information may be provided on whether engagement occurs on a regular basis, at certain points in a project or business process, as well as whether it occurs in response to legal requirements and/or in response to stakeholder requests and whether the result of the engagement is being integrated into the undertaking's decision-making processes; and
  4. for the role with operational responsibility, whether the undertaking requires relevant staff to have certain skills, or whether it provides training or capacity building to relevant staff to undertake engagement.

AR 17. To illustrate how the perspectives of consumers and/or end-users have informed specific decisions or activities of the undertaking, the undertaking may provide examples from the current reporting period.  

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S4.pdf None None None
90 S4 - Consumers and end users Impact, risk and opportunity management S4-3 – Processes to remediate negative impacts and channels for consumers and end-users to raise concerns
  1. The undertaking shall describe the processes it has in place to provide for or cooperate in the remediation of negative impacts on consumers and end-users that the undertaking is connected with, as well as channels available to consumers and endusers to raise concerns and have them addressed.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the formal means by which consumers and/or end-users can make their concerns and needs known directly to the undertaking, and/or through which the undertaking supports the availability of such channels (for example, grievance mechanisms) by its business relationships, how follow up is performed with these consumers and/or end-users regarding the issues raised, and the effectiveness of these channels.

  3. The undertaking shall describe:
    1. its general approach to and processes for providing or contributing to remedy where it has identified that it has caused or contributed to a material negative impact on consumers and/or end-users, including whether and how the undertaking assesses that the remedy provided is effective;
    2. any specific channels it has in place for consumers and/or end-users to raise their concerns or needs directly with the undertaking and have them addressed, including whether these are established by the undertaking itself and/or through participation in third-party mechanisms;
    3. the processes through which the undertaking supports or requires the availability of such channels by its business relationships; and
    4. how it tracks and monitors issues raised and addressed, and how it ensures the effectiveness of the channels, including through involvement of stakeholders who are the intended users.
  1. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it assesses that consumers and/or endusers are aware of and trust these structures or processes as a way to raise their concerns or needs and have them addressed. In addition, the undertaking shall disclose whether it has policies in place to protect individuals from retaliation when they use such structures or processes. If such information has been disclosed in accordance with ESRS G1-1, the undertaking may refer to that information.
  2. If the undertaking cannot disclose the above required information because it has not adopted a channel for raising concerns and/or does not support the availability of mechanisms by its business relationships, it shall disclose this to be the case. It may disclose a timeframe in which it aims to have such a channel or processes in place.

 

Application Requirements

AR 18. In fulfilling the requirements set out by the disclosure criteria of ESRS S4-3, the undertaking may be guided by the content of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights and the OECD Guidelines for Multinational Enterprises focused on remediation and grievance mechanisms.

AR 19. Channels for raising concerns or needs, include grievance mechanisms, hotlines, dialogue processes or other means through which consumers and/or end-users or their legitimate representatives can raise concerns about impacts or explain needs that they would like the undertaking to address. This could include channels provided by the undertaking directly and is to be disclosed in addition to any other mechanisms the undertaking may use to gain insight into the management of impacts on consumers and/or end-users, such as compliance audits. Where the undertaking is relying solely on information about the existence of such channels provided by its business relationships to answer this requirement, it may state that.

AR 20. To provide greater insight into the information covered in ESRS S4-3, the undertaking may provide insight into whether and how consumers and/or end-users that may be affected are able to access channels at the level of the undertaking they are affected by, in relation to each material impact.

AR 21. Third party mechanisms could include those operated by the government, NGOs, industry associations and other collaborative initiatives. With regard to the scope of these mechanisms, the undertaking may disclose whether these are accessible to all consumers and/or end-users who may be potentially or actually materially impacted by the undertaking, or individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of negative impacts, and through which consumers and/or end-users (or individuals or organisations acting on their behalf or who are otherwise in a position to be aware of negative impacts), can raise complaints or concerns related to the undertaking’s own activities.

AR 22. In relation to the protection of individuals that use the mechanisms against the retaliation, the undertaking may describe whether it treats grievances confidentially and with respect to the rights of privacy and data protection; and whether they allow for consumer and/or endusers to use them anonymously (for example, through representation by a third party).

AR 23. In disclosing whether and how the undertaking knows that consumers and/or end-users are aware of and trust any of these channels, the undertaking may provide relevant and reliable data about the effectiveness of these channels from the perspective of consumers and/or end-users themselves. Examples of sources of information are surveys of consumers and/or end-users that have used such channels and their levels of satisfaction with the process and outcomes. To illustrate the usage level of such channels, the undertaking may disclose the number of complaints received from consumers and/or endusers during the reporting period.

AR 24. In describing the effectiveness of channels for consumers and/or end-users to raise concerns, the undertaking may be guided by the following questions, based on the “effectiveness criteria for nonjudicial grievance mechanisms”, as laid out in the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights. The below considerations may be applied on an individual channel basis or for the collective system of channels:

  1. do the channels hold legitimacy by providing appropriate accountability for their fair conduct and building stakeholder trust?
  2. are the channels known and accessible to stakeholders?
  3. do the channels have known procedures, set timeframes and clarity on the processes?
  4. do the channels ensure reasonable access to sources of information, advice and expertise?
  5. do the channels offer transparency by providing sufficient information both to complainants and where applicable, to meet any public interest at stake?
  6. do the outcomes achieved from the channels accord with internationally recognised human rights?
  7. does the undertaking identify insights from the channels that support continuous learning in both improving the channels and preventing future impacts?
  8. does the undertaking focus on dialogue with complainants as the means to reach agreed solutions, rather than seeking to unilaterally determine the outcome?

For more information, see Principle 31 of the UN Guiding Principles on Business and Human Rights.  

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S4.pdf None None None
91 S4 - Consumers and end users Impact, risk and opportunity management S4-4 – Taking action on material impacts on consumers and end-users, and approaches to mitigating material risks and pursuing material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions
  1. The undertaking shall disclose how it takes action to address material impacts on consumers and end-users, and to manage material risks and pursue material opportunities related to consumers and end-users, and effectiveness of those actions.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is twofold. Firstly, it is to provide an understanding of any actions and initiatives through which the undertaking seeks to:
    1. prevent, mitigate and remediate the negative material impacts on consumers and/or end-users, and/or
    2. achieve positive material impacts for consumers and/or end-users.

Secondly, it is to enable an understanding of the ways in which the undertaking is addressing the material risks and pursuing the material opportunities related to consumers and/or endusers.

  1. The undertaking shall provide a summarised description of the action plans and resources to manage its material impacts, risks, and opportunities related to consumers and end-users as per ESRS 2 MDR-A Actions and resources in relation to material sustainability matters.

  2. In relation to material impacts, the undertaking shall describe:
    • actions taken, planned or underway to prevent, mitigate or remediate material negative impacts on consumers and/or end-users;
    • whether and how it has taken action to provide or enable remedy in relation to an actual material impact;
    • any additional actions or initiatives it has in place with the primary purpose of positively contributing to improved social outcomes for consumers and/or end-users; and
    • how it tracks and assesses the effectiveness of these actions and initiatives in delivering intended outcomes for consumers and/or end-users.

  3. In relation to paragraph 28, the undertaking shall describe:
    • the processes through which it identifies what action is needed and appropriate in response to a particular actual or potential negative impact on consumers and/or endusers;
    • its approaches to taking action in relation to specific material negative impacts on consumers and/or end-users, including any action in relation to its own practices regarding product design, marketing or sales, as well as whether wider industry or collaborative action with other relevant parties will be required; and
    • how it ensures that processes to provide or enable remedy in the event of material negative impacts are available and effective in their implementation and outcomes.

  4. In relation to material risks and opportunities, the undertaking shall describe:
    • what action is planned or underway to mitigate material risks for the undertaking arising from its impacts and dependencies on consumers and/or end-users and how it tracks effectiveness in practice; and
    • what action is planned or underway to pursue material opportunities for the undertaking in relation to consumers and/or end-users.

  5. The undertaking shall disclose whether and how it takes action to avoid causing or contributing to material negative impacts on consumers and/or end-users through its own practices, including, where relevant, in relation to marketing, sales and data use. This may include disclosing what approach is taken when tensions arise between the prevention or mitigation of material negative impacts and other business pressures.

  6. When preparing this disclosure, the undertaking shall consider whether severe human rights issues and incidents connected to its consumers and/or end-users have been reported and, if applicable, disclose these[1].

  7. Where the undertaking evaluates the effectiveness of an action by setting a target, in disclosing the information required under paragraph 32 (c), the undertaking shall consider ESRS 2 MDR-T Tracking effectiveness of policies and actions through targets.

  8. The undertaking shall disclose what resources are allocated to the management of its material impacts with information that enables users to gain an understanding of how the material impacts are managed.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #14 in Table III of Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosure rules on sustainable investments (“Number of identified cases of severe human rights issues and incidents”).

Application Requirements

AR 25. It may take time to understand negative impacts and how the undertaking may be involved with them through its downstream value chain, as well as to identify appropriate responses and put them into practice). Therefore, the undertaking shall consider:

  1. Its general and specific approaches to addressing material negative impacts;
  2. its initiatives aimed at contributing to additional material positive impacts;
  3. how far it has progressed in its efforts during the reporting period; and (d) its aims for continued improvement.

AR 26. Appropriate action can vary according to whether the undertaking causes or contributes to a material impact, or whether the material impact is directly linked to its own operations, products or services through a business relationship.

AR 27. Given that material negative impacts affecting consumers and/or end-users that have occurred during the reporting period may also be linked to entities or operations outside its direct control, the undertaking may disclose whether and how it seeks to use leverage with relevant business relationships to manage those impacts. This may include using commercial leverage (for example, enforcing contractual requirements with business relationships or implementing incentives), other forms of leverage within the relationship (such as providing training or capacity-building on proper product use or sale practices to business relationships) or collaborative leverage with peers or other actors (such as initiatives aimed at responsible marketing or product safety).

AR 28. When the undertaking discloses its participation in an industry or multi-stakeholder initiative as part of its actions to address material negative impacts, the undertaking may disclose how the initiative, and its own involvement, is aiming to address the material impact concerned. It may disclose under ESRS S4-5 the relevant targets set by the initiative and progress towards them.

AR 29. When disclosing whether and how it considers actual and potential impacts on consumers and/or end-users in decisions to terminate business relationships and whether and how it seeks to address any negative impacts that may result from termination, the undertaking may include examples.

AR 30. In disclosing how it tracks the effectiveness of actions to manage material impacts during the reporting period, the undertaking may disclose any lessons learned from the previous and current reporting periods.

AR 31. Processes used to track the effectiveness of actions can include internal or external auditing or verification, court proceedings and/or related court decisions, impact assessments, measurement systems, stakeholder feedback, grievance mechanisms, external performance ratings, and benchmarking.

AR 32. Reporting on effectiveness is aimed at enabling the understanding of the links between actions taken by the undertaking and the effective management of impacts.

AR 33. With regard to initiatives or processes the undertaking has in place that are based on affected consumers and/or end-users’ needs and their level of implementation, the undertaking may disclose:

  1. information about whether and how consumers and/or end-users and legitimate representatives or their credible proxies play a role in decisions regarding the design and implementation of these programmes or processes; and
  2. information about the intended or achieved positive outcomes for consumers and/or end- users of these programmes or processes.

AR 34. The undertaking may disclose whether any initiatives or processes whose primary aim is to deliver positive impacts for consumers and/or end-users are designed to also support the achievement of one or more of the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). For example, through a commitment to advance UN SDG 3 to “ensure healthy lives and promote well-being for all at all ages” the undertaking may be actively working to make its products less addictive and harmful to physical and psychological health.

AR 35. When disclosing the intended positive outcomes of its actions for consumers and/or end-users  a distinction is to be made between evidence of certain activities having occurred (for example, that x number of consumers have received information about healthy eating habits) from evidence of actual outcomes for consumers and/or end-users (for example, that x number of consumers have adopted healthier eating habits).

AR 36. When disclosing whether initiatives or processes also play a role in mitigating material negative impacts, the undertaking may, for example, consider programmes that aim to support heightened awareness of the risk of online scams, leading to a reduction in the number of cases of end-users experiencing breaches of data privacy.

AR 37. When disclosing the material risks and opportunities related to the undertaking’s impacts or dependencies on consumers and/or end-users, the undertaking may consider the following:

  1. risks related to the undertaking’s impacts on consumers and/or end-users may include reputational or legal exposure where poorly designed or defective products result in injuries or deaths;
  2. risks related to the undertaking’s dependencies on consumers and/or end-users may include the loss of business continuity where an economic crisis makes consumers unable to afford certain products or services;
  3. business opportunities related to the undertaking’s impacts on consumers and/or end- users may include market differentiation and greater customer appeal from offering safe products or privacy-respecting services; and
  4. business opportunities related to the undertaking’s dependencies on consumers and/or end-users may include the achievement of a loyal future consumer base by ensuring, for example, that LGBTQI people are respected and that the undertaking’s selling practices do not exclude such people from the products or services it offers.

AR 38. When disclosing whether dependencies turn into risks, the undertaking shall consider external developments.

AR 39. When disclosing policies, action and resources and targets related to the management of material risks and opportunities, in cases where risks and opportunities arise from a material impact, the undertaking may cross-reference its disclosures on policies, action and resources and targets in relation to that impact.

AR 40. The undertaking shall consider the extent to which its processes to manage material risks related to consumers and/or end-users are integrated into its existing risk management processes and how.

AR 41. When disclosing the resources allocated to the management of material impacts, the undertaking may disclose which internal functions are involved in managing the impacts and what types of action they take to address negative and advance positive impacts. 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S4.pdf None None MDR-A
92 S4 - Consumers and end users Metrics and targets S4-5 – Targets related to managing material negative impacts, advancing positive impacts, and managing material risks and opportunities
  1. The undertaking shall disclose the time-bound and outcome-oriented targets it may have set related to:
    1. reducing negative impacts on consumers and/or end-users; and/or
    2. advancing positive impacts on consumers and/or end-users; and/or
    3. managing material risks and opportunities related to consumers and/or endusers.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking is using time-bound and outcome-oriented targets to drive and measure progress in addressing material negative impacts, and/or advancing positive impacts on consumers and/or end-users, and/or in managing material risks and opportunities related to consumers and/or end-users.

  3. The summarised description of the targets to manage its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to consumers and/or end-users shall contain the information requirements defined in ESRS 2 MDR-T.

  4. The undertaking shall disclose the process for setting the targets, including whether and how the undertaking engaged directly with consumers and/or end-users, their legitimate representatives, or with credible proxies that have insight into their situation in:
    1. setting any such targets;
    2. tracking the undertaking’s performance against them; and
    3. identifying, if any, lessons or improvements as a result of the undertaking’s performance.

Application Requirements

AR 42. When disclosing targets in relation to consumers and/or end-users, the undertaking may disclose:

  1. the intended outcomes to be achieved in the lives of consumers and/or end-users, being as specific as possible;
  2. their stability over time in terms of definitions and methodologies to enable comparability; and/or
  3. references standards or commitments on which the targets are based are to be clearly defined in the reporting (for instance codes of conduct, sourcing policies, global frameworks or industry codes).

AR 43. Targets related to material risks and opportunities may be the same as or distinct from targets tied to material impacts. For example, a target to ensure equal access to finance for underserved consumers could both reduce discrimination impacts on those consumers and enlarge the undertaking’s pool of customers.

AR 44. The undertaking may also distinguish between short, medium and long-term targets covering the same policy commitment. For example, the undertaking may have as a main objective to make its online services accessible to people with disabilities, with the long term goal of having adapted 100% of its online services by 2025, and with the short-term objective of adding x number of accessible features every year up and until 2025.

AR 45. When modifying or replacing a target in the reporting period, the undertaking may explain the change by cross-referencing it to significant changes in the business model or to broader changes in the accepted standard or legislation from which the target is derived to provide contextual information as per ESRS 2 BP-2 Disclosures in relation to specific circumstances.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20S4.pdf None None MDR-T
93 G1 - Business conduct Governance G1 related to ESRS 2 GOV-1 – The role of the administrative, supervisory and management bodies
  1. When disclosing information about the role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies, the undertaking shall cover the following aspects:
    1. the role of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies related to business conduct; and
    2. the expertise of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies on business conduct matters.

 

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20G1.pdf None None None
94 G1 - Business conduct Impact, risk and opportunity management G1 related to ESRS 2 IRO-1 – Description of the processes to identify and assess material impacts, risks and opportunities
  1. When describing the process to identify material impacts, risks and opportunities in relation to business conduct matters, the undertaking shall disclose all relevant criteria used in the process, including location, activity, sector and the structure of the transaction.

 

 
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20G1.pdf None None false
95 G1 - Business conduct Impact, risk and opportunity management G1-1 – Corporate culture and business conduct policies
  1. The undertaking shall disclose its policies with respect to business conduct matters and how it fosters its corporate culture.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to enable an understanding of the extent to which the undertaking has policies that address the identification, assessment, management and/or remediation of its material impacts, risks and opportunities related to business conduct matters. It also aims to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s approach to corporate culture.

  3. The disclosures required under paragraph 7 shall include how the undertaking establishes, develops, promotes and evaluates its corporate culture.

  4. The disclosures in paragraph 7 shall cover the following aspects related to the undertaking’s policies on business conduct matters:
    1. a description of the mechanisms for identifying, reporting and investigating concerns about unlawful behaviour or behaviour in contradiction of its code of conduct or similar internal rules; and whether it accommodates reporting from internal and/or external stakeholders;
    2. where the undertaking has no policies on anti-corruption or anti-bribery consistent with the United Nations Convention against Corruption[1], it shall state this and whether it has plans to implement them and the timetable for implementation; (c) how the undertaking protects whistleblowers, including:
      1. details on the establishment of internal whistleblower reporting channels, including whether the undertaking provides for information and training to its own workers and information about the designation and training of staff receiving reports; and
      2. measures to protect against retaliation its own workers who are whistleblowers in accordance with the applicable law transposing Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council[2];
    3. where the undertaking has no policies on the protection of whistle-blowers[3], it shall state this and whether it has plans to implement them and the timetable for implementation;
    4. beyond the procedures to follow-up on reports by whistleblowers in accordance with the applicable law transposing Directive (EU) 2019/1937, whether the undertaking has procedures to investigate business conduct incidents, including incidents of corruption and bribery, promptly, independently and objectively;
    5. where applicable, whether the undertaking has in place policies with respect to animal welfare;
    6. the undertaking’s policy for training within the organisation on business conduct, including target audience, frequency and depth of coverage; and
    7. the functions within the undertaking that are most at risk in respect of corruption and bribery.

  5. Undertakings that are subject to legal requirements under national law transposing Directive (EU) 2019/1937, or to equivalent legal requirements with regard to the protection of whistleblowers, may comply with the disclosure specified in paragraph 10 (d) by stating that they are subject to those legal requirements.

[1] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #15 in Table III of Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Lack of anti-corruption and anti-bribery policies”).

[2] Directive (EU) 2019/1937 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 October 2019 on the protection of persons who report breaches of Union law (OJ L 305, 26.11.2019, p. 17). 

[3] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts as set out by indicator #6 in Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Insufficient whistleblower protection”).

Application Requirements

AR 1. The undertaking may consider the following aspects when determining its disclosure under paragraph 7:

  1. the aspects of corporate culture that are taken into consideration and discussed by the administrative, management and supervisory bodies and with which frequency;
  2. the principal themes that are promoted and communicated as part of the corporate culture;
  3. how the members of the undertaking’s administrative, management and supervisory bodies provide direction to promote a corporate culture; and
  4. specific incentives or tools for its own workers to foster and encourage its corporate culture.
https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20G1.pdf None None MDR-P
96 G1 - Business conduct Impact, risk and opportunity management G1-2 – Management of relationships with suppliers
  1. The undertaking shall provide information about the management of its relationships with its suppliers and its impacts on its supply chain.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide an understanding of the undertaking’s management of its procurement process including fair behaviour with suppliers.

  3. The undertaking shall provide a description of its policy to prevent late payments, specifically to SMEs.

  4. The disclosure required under paragraph 12 shall include the following information:
    1. the undertaking’s approach to its relationships with its suppliers, taking account of risks to the undertaking related to its supply chain and of impacts on sustainability matters; and
    2. whether and how it takes into account social and environmental criteria for the selection of its suppliers.

 

Application Requirements

AR 2. For purposes of this standard, management of relationships with the undertaking’s suppliers may include the following:

  1. how the undertaking’s practices, including activities to avoid or minimise the impacts of disruptions to its supply chain, support its strategy and risk management;
  2. training of the undertaking’s procurement/supply chain workforce on engagement and dialogue with suppliers as well as incentives of its procurement workforce including whether such incentives refer to price, quality or sustainability factors;
  3. the screening and evaluation of social and environmental performance of suppliers;
  4. the inclusion of locally based suppliers in its supply chain and/or suppliers with certification;
  5. how the undertaking’s practices deal with vulnerable suppliers;
  6. the undertaking’s targets and actions with regard to communication and management of relationships with suppliers; and
  7. how the outcomes of these practices are evaluated, including supplier visits, audits or surveys.

AR 3. 'Vulnerable suppliers’ includes suppliers that are exposed to significant economic, environmental and/or social risks.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20G1.pdf None None None
97 G1 - Business conduct Impact, risk and opportunity management G1-3 – Prevention and detection of corruption or bribery
  1. The undertaking shall provide information about its system to prevent and detect, investigate, and respond to allegations or incidents relating to corruption and bribery including the related training.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide transparency on the key procedures of the undertaking to prevent, detect, and address allegations about corruption and bribery. This includes the training provided to own workers and/or information provided internally or to suppliers.

  3. The disclosure required under paragraph 16 shall include the following information:
    1. a description of the procedures in place to prevent, detect, and address allegations or incidents of corruption and bribery;
    2. whether the investigators or investigating committee are separate from the chain of management involved in the matter; and
    3. the process, if any, to report outcomes to the administrative, management and supervisory bodies.

  4. Where the undertaking has no such procedures in place, it shall disclose this fact and, where applicable, its plans to adopt them.

  5. The disclosures required by paragraph 16 shall include information about how the undertaking communicates its policies to those for whom they are relevant to ensure that the policy is accessible and that they understand its implications.

  6. The disclosure required by paragraph 16 shall include information about the following with respect to training:
    1. the nature, scope and depth of anti-corruption and anti-bribery training programmes offered or required by the undertaking;
    2. the percentage of functions-at-risk covered by training programmes; and
    3. the extent to which training is given to members of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies.

Application Requirements

AR 4.  ‘Functions-at-risk’ means those functions deemed to be at risk of corruption and bribery as a result of its tasks and responsibilities.

AR 5. Disclosures may include details about the risk assessments and/or mapping, as well as monitoring programmes and/or internal control procedures performed by the undertaking to detect corruption and bribery.

AR 6. The undertaking’s policies on corruption and bribery may be relevant to specific groups of people, either because they are expected to implement them (for example, the undertaking’s employees, contractors and suppliers), or because they have a direct interest in their implementation (for example, value chain workers, investors). The undertaking may disclose the communication tools and channels (e.g., flyers, newsletters, dedicated websites, social media, face to face interactions, unions and/or workers representatives) to communicate policies to such groups. This may also include the identification and/or removal of potential barriers to dissemination, such as through translation into relevant languages or the use of graphic depictions.

AR 7. The undertaking may disclose an analysis of its training activities by, for example, region of training or category of own workforce where its programmes differ significantly based on such factors and such information would be useful to users.

AR 8.    The undertaking may present the required information about training using the following table:

Anti-corruption and bribery training illustrative example

During the 20XY financial year ABC provided training to its at-risk own workers in terms of its policy (see note x). For those at-risk functions the training is mandatory, but ABC also made available voluntary training for other own workers. Details of its training during the year is as follows: 

 

At-risk functions

 Managers

 AMSB132

Other own workers

Training coverage

 

 

 

 

Total

20,000

200

16

70,000

Total receiving training

19,500

150

8

5,000

Delivery method and

duration

 

 

 

 

Classroom training

5 hours

 

 

 

Computer-based training

1 hour

2 hours

1 hour

 

Voluntary computer-based

training

 

 

 

1 hour

Frequency

 

 

 

 

How often training is required

Annually

Annually

Bi-annually

-

Topics covered

 

 

 

 

Definition of corruption

X

X

X

X

Policy

X

X

X

X

Procedures on suspicion/detection

X

X

 

 

Etc.

X

 

 

 

132 Administrative, management and supervisory bodies.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20G1.pdf None None None
98 G1 - Business conduct Metrics and targets G1-4 – Confirmed incidents of corruption or bribery
  1. The undertaking shall provide information on incidents of corruption or bribery during the reporting period.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide transparency on the incidents relating to corruption or bribery during the reporting period and the related outcomes.

  3. The undertaking shall disclose:
    1. the number of convictions and the amount of fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti- bribery laws[1]; and
    2. any actions taken to address breaches in procedures and standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery[2].

  4. The undertaking may disclose:
    1. the total number and nature of confirmed incidents of corruption or bribery;
    2. the number of confirmed incidents in which own workers were dismissed or disciplined for corruption or bribery-related incidents;
    3. the number of confirmed incidents relating to contracts with business partners that were terminated or not renewed due to violations related to corruption or bribery; and
    4. details of public legal cases regarding corruption or bribery brought against the undertaking and its own workers during the reporting period and the outcomes of such cases. This includes cases that were initiated in previous years where the outcome was only established in the current reporting period.

  5. The disclosures required shall include incidents involving actors in its value chain only where the undertaking or its employees are directly involved.

[1] This information supports the information needs of: financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out in indicator #17 of Table III of Annex I of  Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Number of convictions and amount of fines for violation of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws”); and benchmark administrators to disclose ESG factors subject to Regulation (EU) 2020/1816 as set out by indicator “Numbers of convictions and amount of fines for violations of anti-corruption and anti-bribery laws” in section 1 and 2 of Annex II.

[2] This information supports the information needs of financial market participants subject to Regulation (EU) 2019/2088 because it is derived from an additional indicator related to principal adverse impacts set out in in indicator #16 of Table III of Annex I of Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2022/1288 with regard to disclosures rules on sustainable investments (“Cases of insufficient action taken to address breaches of standards of anti-corruption and anti-bribery”).

 

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20G1.pdf None None MDR-A
99 G1 - Business conduct Metrics and targets G1-5 – Political influence and lobbying activities
  1. The undertaking shall provide information on the activities and commitments related to exerting its political influence, including its lobbying activities related to its material impacts, risks and opportunities.

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide transparency on the undertaking’s activities and commitments related to exerting its political influence with political contributions, including the types and purpose of lobbying activities.

  3. The disclosure required by paragraph 27 shall include:
    1. if applicable, the representative(s) responsible in the administrative, management and supervisory bodies for the oversight of these activities;
    2. for financial or in-kind political contributions:
      1. the total monetary value of financial and in-kind political contributions made directly and indirectly by the undertaking aggregated by country or geographical area where relevant, as well as type of recipient/beneficiary; and
      2. where appropriate, how the monetary value of in-kind contributions is estimated.
    3. the main topics covered by its lobbying activities and the undertaking’s main positions on these in brief. This shall include explanations on how this interacts with its material impacts, risks and opportunities identified in its materiality assessment per ESRS 2; and
    4. if the undertaking is registered in the EU Transparency Register or in an equivalent transparency register in a Member State, the name of any such register and its identification number in the register.
  1. The disclosure shall also include information about the appointment of any members of the administrative, management and supervisory bodies who held a comparable position in public administration (including regulators) in the 2 years preceding such appointment in the current reporting period.

Application Requirements

AR 9. For purposes of this Standard ‘political contribution’ means financial or in-kind support provided directly to political parties, their elected representatives or persons seeking political office. Financial contributions can include donations, loans, sponsorships, advance payments for services, or the purchase of tickets for fundraising events and other similar practices. In-kind contributions can include advertising, use of facilities, design and printing, donation of equipment, provision of board membership, employment or consultancy work for elected politicians or candidates for office.

AR 10. ‘Indirect political contribution’ refers to those political contributions made through an intermediary organisation such as a lobbyist or charity, or support given to an organisation such as a think tank or trade association linked to or supporting particular political parties or causes.

AR 11. When determining ‘comparable position’ in this standard, the undertaking shall consider various factors, including level of responsibility and scope of activities undertaken.

AR 12. The undertaking may provide the following information on its financial or in-kind contributions with regard to its lobbying expenses:

  1. the total monetary amount of such internal and external expenses; and
  2. the total amount paid for membership to lobbying associations.

AR 13. If the undertaking is legally obliged to be a member of a chamber of commerce or other organisation that represents its interests, it may disclose that this is the case. 

AR 14. In meeting the requirement in paragraph 29(c) the undertaking shall consider the alignment between its public statements on its material impacts, risks and opportunities and its lobbying activities.

AR 15. An example of what such disclosures could look like:

Political engagement (including lobbying activities) illustrative example

During the 20XY financial year ABC was involved in activities around the proposed regulation XXX which could have significant negative impacts on its business model if implemented in the current format. ABC’s considers that while the proposed regulation will realise some improvements to the regulatory regime such as xxx, in its current format the costs relating to xxx will outweigh the benefits. ABC and its peers continue to work with XXX (the regulator) to improve this balance.

ABC also supported the QRP political party in Country X and EFG party in Country Y as both …. ABC is registered in its local transparency register, i.e., XYZ, and its registration number is 987234.

Amounts in € thousands. 

 

2023

2022 [TBC]

Political funding provided

100

 

Funding to QRP

75

 

Funding to EFG

25

 

 

100

 

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20G1.pdf None None None
100 G1 - Business conduct Metrics and targets G1-6 – Payment practices
  1. The undertaking shall provide information on its payment practices, especially with respect to late payments to small and medium enterprises (SMEs).

  2. The objective of this Disclosure Requirement is to provide insights on the contractual payment terms and on its performance with regard to payment, especially as to how these impact SMEs and specifically with respect to late payments to SMEs.

  3. The disclosure under paragraph 31 shall include:
    1. the average time the undertaking takes to pay an invoice from the date when the contractual or statutory term of payment starts to be calculated, in number of days;
    2. a description of the undertaking’s standard payment terms in number of days by main category of suppliers and the percentage of its payments aligned with these standard terms;
    3. the number of legal proceedings currently outstanding for late payments; and
    4. complementary information necessary to provide sufficient context. If the undertaking has used representative sampling to calculate the information required under point (a), it shall state that fact and briefly describe the methodology used.

Application Requirements

AR 16. In some cases, the undertaking’s standard contractual payment terms may differ significantly depending on country or type of supplier. In such cases, information about the standard terms per main categories of suppliers or country or geographical region could be examples of additional contextual information to explain the disclosures in paragraph 33(b).

AR 17. An example of what the description of standard contract term disclosures in paragraph 33(b) could look like:

ABC’s standard contract payment terms are payment on receipt of invoice for wholesalers which encompass approximately 80% of its annual invoices by value. It pays for services received within 30 days after receipt of the invoice which are about 5% of its annual invoices. The remainder of its invoices are paid within 60 days of receipt except for those in country X which in accordance with the marketplace standards are paid within 90 days of receipt.

https://esrsfiles.sustainitright.com/2023%2007%2031%20ANNEX%20I%20-%20ESRS%20G1.pdf None None None